Rat liver chromatin non-histone proteins and glucocorticoid binding

We have previously characterized a specific corticosterone binding protein in chromosomal non histone proteins (NHP) from rat liver. In this paper, we present evidence that a relationship exists between this protein and the cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptor. The binding capacity of NHP is reduced by 40 p. cent when this fraction is isolated from adrenalectomized animals. Incubation of isolated nuclei with the glucocorticoid hormone receptor complex results in a decrease in the specific radioactivity of the cytoplasmic proteins and simultaneously in a rapid uptake of the isotope by the nucleus; radioactive hormone was extracted along with the NHP. Evidence is presented that the NHP component binding the hormone is closely related or identical to the cytoplasmic receptor-proteins. Progesterone and corticosterone compete similarly for the binding of dexamethasone to nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of the receptor. However the nuclear form of the receptor has a higher affinity for corticosterone (K_a : 6 × 10⁹ M⁻¹) than for dexamethasone (K_A : 10⁸ M⁻¹) in vitro.A mixture of rat liver NHP and cytosol was shown to bind specifically more corticosterone than when the two proteins were incubated separately with the hormone. The Scatchard analysis shows that the enhancement of binding is due to an interaction of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins leading to the appearance of a stable protein-protein complex which has a high affinity for the hormone (K_a : 2 × 10⁸ M⁻¹). KCl prevented this interaction. Complex formation does not require the presence of the hormone. The experiments presented here favor the hypothesis of the existence of a regulatory protein in the nucleus. This protein associated with the binding protein to reveal or enhance the active form of the receptor.     

Isolation of chromatin fragments rich in non-histone protein after endonuclease digestion of rat liver nuclei

Detergent-washed rat liver nuclei, prepared in the presence of a protease inhibitor, were incubated for up to 60 min at 37 °C. The action of endonucleases produced chromatin fragments which could be removed from the nuclei by extraction with 8 M urea 50 mM phosphate, pH 7.6, 15% of the total nuclear DNA being extracted. No DNA could be detected in this extract after incubation of nuclei at 4 °C. The chromatin fragments were sedimented by centrifugation at 90000 g or by chromatography on Sepharose 4B. The DNA fragment sizes were similar to those found in nucleosome particles but the protein/DNA ratio was approx. 5.3:1. The nuclei were prelabelled with [³H]tryptophan and 60% of the label present in the 8 M urea extract was found to sediment with the chromatin fraction. SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the latter showed the presence, in addition to histones, of at least 25 polypeptide species of tightly bound non-histone proteins with molecular weights in excess of 30000.     

DNA-binding specificity of a chromatin non-histone protein fraction of HeLa cells.

The DNA-binding site of a previously characterized non-histone chromosomal protein antigen(s) from HeLa cells was investigated for its species specificity. Treatment with large amounts of micrococcal nuclease abolishes immunoactivity, which can then be recovered by the subsequent addition of human or HeLa DNA to reconstitute the immune complex. Neither rat nor calif DNA exhibits this property, but DNA from monkey cells gives considerable activity. The antigen is not, however, detectable in monkey chromatin.     

Interaction of the non-histone protein PS1 with some chromatin components

The binding of non-histone protein from mouse spleen chromatin located in the sites highly sensitive to micrococcal nuclease and DNA-ase I, to DNA and histones was studied. The binding of the DNA-protein complexes to nitrocellulose filters demonstrated the absence of protein binding to DNA. A highly selective binding of protein PS1 to histones H1 and H2A and to one of the non-histone proteins (presumably HMG 14) was revealed. It is concluded that protein PS1 is incorporated into chromatin by the protein-protein interactions.     

Changes in non-histone chromatin proteins during the storage of chromatin

We have described here the changes in stored chicken reticulocyte chromatin which take place among non-histone protein fractions based on SDS-polyacylamide gel electrophoresis and hybridization of globin cDNA with RNAs transcribed on native and reconstitited chromatin templates.     

Interaction of a non-histone chromatin protein (high-mobility group protein 2) with DNA.

1. The interaction with DNA of the calf thymus chromatin non-histone protein termed the high-mobility group protein 2 has been studied by sedimentation analysis in the ultracentrifuge and by measuring the binding of the 125I-labelled protein to DNA. The results have been compared with those obtained previously by us [Eur. J. Biochem. (1974) 47, 263-270] for the interaction of high-mobility group protein 1 with DNA. Although the binding parameters are similar for these two proteins, high-mobility group protein 2 differs from high-mobility group protein 1 in that the former appears to change the shape of the DNA to a more compact form. 2. The molecular weight of high-mobility group protein 2 has been determined by equilibrium sedimentation and a mean value of 26 000 was obtained. 3. A low level of nuclease activity detected in one preparation of high-mobility group protein 2 has been investigated.     

Acid-soluble, non-histone proteins in rat liver chromatin. Interaction with DNA

Some properties of nonhistone proteins of rat liver chromatin (Mr 40 +/- 1 and 41 +/- 1 KD) are described. These proteins are abundant in monomeric particles formed at the early steps of chromatin fragmentation by Ca2+,Mg2+-DNase. The proteins are not extracted from chromatin by 5% HClO4 and 1 M NaCl, but can be extracted by 0.4 n H2SO4 and 2 M NaCl. Study on proteins binding to DNA demonstrated that in 0.05 M NaCl these proteins are bound both to bovine satellite DNA and to the plasmid pBR 322 DNA.     

Role of non-histone proteins in chromatin solubility

Treatment of chromatin gel with low ionic strength solution of tRNA has produced the dioxyribonucleoprotein (dnptRNA) in which only part of non-histone proteins was removed without loss of any major histone fraction. The solubility of DNP in the presence of 0.15 M NaCl and 1 to 5 mM MgCl2 was considerably higher than that of initial untreated chromatin. It has been assumed that the solubility of chromatin depended primarily on some non-histone proteins and not on H1 histone.     

Immunochemical study of chromatin non-histone proteins

Summary Rabbit antibodies against rat thymus and liver chromatin are obtained. Antithymus IgG are found to interact only with homologous chromatin, while antiliver IgG interact with both liver and thymus chromatin. After preincubation of antiliver IgG with thymus chromatin the antibodies interact with homologous chromatin only. Thus chromatin of both organs contains tissue-specific proteins. Antiliver and antithymus IgG are used to investigate a distribution of tissue-specific and tissue-non-specific immunogenic proteins in thymocyte nuclei. It is shown that these proteins are practically lacking in nuclear membranes, matrix, nuclear sap, nucleous chromatin and do not participate in attaching DNA to the nuclear matrix.Abbreviations NHP non-histone chromatin proteins - IgG immunoglobulins G - PMSF PhMeSO₃     

Lectin activity of chromatin non-histone proteins

Non-histone proteins from chromatin of sea urchin embryos were found to possess the ability to agglutinate erythrocytes.     

Glycoprotein mannosylation in rat liver nuclei

Nuclei and non-nuclear membranes were tested for their ability to transfer in vitro (14C)mannose from GDP-(14C)mannose to endogenous glycoprotein acceptors in the presence and in the absence of exogenous retinyl-phosphate. Electrophoretic analysis shows that retinylphosphate is responsible for the labeling of a few endogenous acceptors only in the non-nuclear membranes; in the nuclei the mannosylation reaction is not retinylphosphate dependent and the electrophoretic profile of the labeled protein acceptors is different from that of the non-nuclear membranes.