Marker Configuration Model-Based Roentgen Fluoroscopic Analysis

It remains unknown if and how the polyethylene bearing in mobile bearing knees moves during dynamic activities with respect to the tibial base plate. Marker Configuration Model-Based Roentgen Fluoroscopic Analysis (MCM-based RFA) uses a marker configuration model of inserted tantalum markers in order to accurately estimate the pose of an implant or bone using single plane Roentgen images or fluoroscopic images. The goal of this study is to assess the accuracy of (MCM-Based RFA) in a standard fluoroscopic set-up using phantom experiments and to determine the error propagation with computer simulations. The experimental set-up of the phantom study was calibrated using a calibration box equipped with 600 tantalum markers, which corrected for image distortion and determined the focus position. In the computer simulation study the influence of image distortion, MC-model accuracy, focus position, the relative distance between MC-models and MC-model configuration on the accuracy of MCM-Based RFA were assessed. The phantom study established that the in-plane accuracy of MCM-Based RFA is 0.1 mm and the out-of-plane accuracy is 0.9 mm. The rotational accuracy is 0.1 degrees. A ninth-order polynomial model was used to correct for image distortion. Marker-Based RFA was estimated to have, in a worst case scenario, an in vivo translational accuracy of 0.14 mm (x-axis), 0.17 mm (y-axis), 1.9 mm (z-axis), respectively, and a rotational accuracy of 0.3 degrees. When using fluoroscopy to study kinematics, image distortion and the accuracy of models are important factors, which influence the accuracy of the measurements. MCM-Based RFA has the potential to be an accurate, clinically useful tool for studying kinematics after total joint replacement using standard equipment.     

Comparative accuracy of radiostereometric and optical tracking systems

This study aims to quantify and compare the accuracy of traditional radiostereometric analysis (RSA), fluoroscopic RSA (fRSA), and optical tracking systems. Three phantoms were constructed, each having three stainless steel spheres and three reflective markers. One phantom was mounted to the base of a precision cross-slide table, one to the base of a precision rotation table, and the third was mounted to each moveable tabletop. Two dial-gauges, rigidly mounted to the cross-slide table and rotation table, quantified translations and rotations. Two fluoroscopy units placed orthogonally tracked the steel spheres while a four-camera optical motion capture system tracked the reflective markers in three-dimensional space. RSA was performed with both digital radiography and fluoroscopy. Three axes of translation were tested: parallel to one fluoroscopy image, parallel to the other fluoroscopy image, and at approximately 45° to each image. One axis of rotation was tested. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated excellent agreement between the actual (dial-gauge) and measured translations for all modalities (ICCs>0.99) and excellent agreement between actual and measured rotations for RSA and fRSA (ICCs>0.99). Standard errors of measurement ranged from 0.032 mm and 0.121° for RSA, to 0.040 mm and 0.229° for fRSA, and to 0.109 mm and 0.613° for optical tracking. Differences between actual and measured translations along the 45° axis were significantly smaller than the two parallel axes. These findings suggest that under ideal conditions, accuracy of fRSA is comparable to traditional RSA, and superior to optical tracking. Accuracy is highest when measured at 45° to the fluoroscopy units.     

Implementation and validation of an implant-based coordinate system for RSA migration calculation

An in vitro radiostereometric analysis (RSA) phantom study of a total knee replacement was carried out to evaluate the effect of implementing two new modifications to the conventional RSA procedure: (i) adding a landmark of the tibial component as an implant marker and (ii) defining an implant-based coordinate system constructed from implant landmarks for the calculation of migration results. The motivation for these two modifications were (i) to improve the representation of the implant by the markers by including the stem tip marker which increases the marker distribution (ii) to recover clinical RSA study cases with insufficient numbers of markers visible in the implant polyethylene and (iii) to eliminate errors in migration calculations due to misalignment of the anatomical axes with the RSA global coordinate system. The translational and rotational phantom studies showed no loss of accuracy with the two new measurement methods. The RSA system employing these methods has a precision of better than 0.05 mm for translations and 0.03° for rotations, and an accuracy of 0.05 mm for translations and 0.15° for rotations. These results indicate that the new methods to improve the interpretability, relevance, and standardization of the results do not compromise precision and accuracy, and are suitable for application to clinical data.     

Validation of radiostereometric analysis in six degrees of freedom for use with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

A phantom study was conducted to determine bias in motion and bias at zero motion of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for evaluating implant relative displacement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). A Sawbones shoulder phantom was fitted with a RTSA implant set and 13 tantalum markers. The model was fixed to a manual micrometer, providing controlled movements though fifteen known increments in translation and twelve increments in rotation (0.02–5.00 mm and 0.1–6.0°), along each translation and rotation axis. Movement between the glenoid and humerus was assessed using beads vs. beads (B/B), model vs. beads (M/B), and model vs. model (M/M) measurement methods in a model-based RSA environment. Bias in motion and bias at zero motion were defined as the difference between measured and accepted reference values, and the difference between double examinations with a theoretical displacement of zero, respectively. Bias in motion ranged from 0.054 ± 0.010 to 0.129 ± 0.014 mm and 0.076 ± 0.025 to 0.126 ± 0.025° (B/B), 0.023 ± 0.009 to 0.126 ± 0.016 mm and 0.111 ± 0.033 to 0.794 ± 0.251° (M/B), and 0.029 ± 0.010 to 0.135 ± 0.030 mm and 0.243 ± 0.088 to 0.384 ± 0.153° (M/M). Bias at zero motion ranged from 0.120 to 0.156 mm and 0.075 to 0.206° (B/B), 0.074 to 0.149 mm and 0.067 to 1.953° (M/B), and 0.069 to 0.259 mm and 0.284 to 1.273° (M/M). This is the first RSA for RTSA study, with results comparable to those validating the use of RSA for hip and knee arthroplasties (accepted as 0.05–0.50 mm and 0.15–1.15°), justifying the potential use of RSA as a tool for measuring implant displacement in the shoulder.     

A comparison of calibration methods for stereo fluoroscopic imaging systems

Stereo (biplane) fluoroscopic imaging systems are considered the most accurate and precise systems to study joint kinematics in vivo. Calibration of a biplane fluoroscopy system consists of three steps: (1) correction for spatial image distortion; (2) calculation of the focus position; and (3) calculation of the relative position and orientation of the two fluoroscopy systems with respect to each other. In this study we compared 6 methods for calibrating a biplane fluoroscopy system including a new method using a novel nested-optimization technique. To quantify bias and precision, an electronic digital caliper instrumented with two tantalum markers on radiolucent posts was imaged in three configurations, and for each configuration placed in ten static poses distributed throughout the viewing volume. Bias and precision were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of the displacement of the markers measured between the three caliper configurations. The data demonstrated that it is essential to correct for image distortion when sub-millimeter accuracy is required. We recommend calibrating a stereo fluoroscopic imaging system using an accurately machined plate and a calibration cube, which improved accuracy 2-3 times compared to the other calibration methods. Once image distortion is properly corrected, the focus position should be determined using the Direct Linear Transformation (DLT) method for its increased speed and equivalent accuracy compared to the novel nested-optimization method. The DLT method also automatically provides the 3D fluoroscopy configuration. Using the recommended calibration methodology, bias and precision of 0.09 and 0.05 mm or better can be expected for measuring inter-marker distances.     

A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) was developed to measure micromotion of an orthopaedic implant with respect to its surrounding bone. A disadvantage of conventional RSA is that it requires the implant to be marked with tantalum beads. This disadvantage can potentially be resolved with model-based RSA, whereby a 3D model of the implant is used for matching with the actual images and the assessment of position and rotation of the implant. In this study, a model-based RSA algorithm is presented and validated in phantom experiments. To investigate the influence of the accuracy of the implant models that were used for model-based RSA, we studied both computer aided design (CAD) models as well as models obtained by means of reversed engineering (RE) of the actual implant. The results demonstrate that the RE models provide more accurate results than the CAD models. If these RE models are derived from the very same implant, it is possible to achieve a maximum standard deviation of the error in the migration calculation of 0.06 mm for translations in x- and y-direction and 0.14 mm for the out of plane z-direction, respectively. For rotations about the y-axis, the standard deviation was about 0.1 degrees and for rotations about the x- and z-axis 0.05 degrees. Studies with clinical RSA-radiographs must prove that these results can also be reached in a clinical setting, making model-based RSA a possible alternative for marker-based RSA.     

Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants

Attaching tantalum markers to prostheses for Roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA) may be difficult and is sometimes even impossible. In this study, a model-based RSA method that avoids the attachment of markers to prostheses is presented and validated. This model-based RSA method uses a triangulated surface model of the implant. A projected contour of this model is calculated and this calculated model contour is matched onto the detected contour of the actual implant in the RSA radiograph. The difference between the two contours is minimized by variation of the position and orientation of the model. When a minimal difference between the contours is found, an optimal position and orientation of the model has been obtained. The method was validated by means of a phantom experiment. Three prosthesis components were used in this experiment: the femoral and tibial component of an Interax total knee prosthesis (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Rutherfort, USA) and the femoral component of a Profix total knee prosthesis (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, USA). For the prosthesis components used in this study, the accuracy of the model-based method is lower than the accuracy of traditional RSA. For the Interax femoral and tibial components, significant dimensional tolerances were found that were probably caused by the casting process and manual polishing of the components surfaces. The largest standard deviation for any translation was 0.19mm and for any rotation it was 0.52 degrees. For the Profix femoral component that had no large dimensional tolerances, the largest standard deviation for any translation was 0.22mm and for any rotation it was 0.22 degrees. From this study we may conclude that the accuracy of the current model-based RSA method is sensitive to dimensional tolerances of the implant. Research is now being conducted to make model-based RSA less sensitive to dimensional tolerances and thereby improving its accuracy.     

A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) measures micromotion of an orthopaedic implant with respect to its surrounding bone. A problem in RSA is that the markers are sometimes overprojected by the implant itself. This study describes the so-called Marker Configuration Model-based RSA (MCM-based RSA) that is able to measure the pose of a rigid body in situations where less than three markers could be detected in both images of an RSA radiograph. MCM-based RSA is based on fitting a Marker Configuration model (MC-model) to the projection lines from the marker projection positions in the image to their corresponding Roentgen foci. An MC-model describes the positions of markers relative to each other and is obtained using conventional RSA. We used data from 15 double examinations of a clinical study of total knee prostheses and removed projections of the three tibial component markers, simulating occlusion of markers. The migration of the tibial component with respect to the bone, which should be zero, for the double examination is a measure of the accuracy of algorithm. With the new algorithm, it is possible to estimate the pose of a rigid body of which one or two markers are occluded in one of the images of the RSA radiograph with high accuracy as long as a proper MC-model of the markers in the rigid body is available. The new algorithm makes RSA more robust for occlusion of markers. This improves the results of clinical RSA studies because the number of lost RSA follow-up moments is reduced.     

Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers

When measuring knee kinematics with skin-mounted markers, soft tissue and structures surrounding the knee hide the actual underlying segment kinematics. Soft-tissue artefacts can be reduced when plate-mounted markers or marker trees are used instead of individual unconstrained mounted markers. The purpose of this study was to accurately quantify the soft-tissue artefacts and to compare two marker cluster fixation methods by using fluoroscopy of knee motion after total knee arthroplasty during a step-up task. Ten subjects participated 6 months after their total knee arthroplasty. The patients were randomised into (1) a plate-mounted marker group and (2) a strap-mounted marker group. Fluoroscopic data were collected during a step-up motion. A three-dimensional model fitting technique was used to reconstruct the in vivo 3-D positions of the markers and the implants representing the bones. The measurement errors associated with the thigh were generally larger (maximum translational error: 17mm; maximum rotational error 12 degrees ) than the measurement errors for the lower leg (maximum translational error: 11mm; maximum rotational error 10 degrees ). The strap-mounted group showed significant more translational errors than the plate-mounted group for both the shank (respectively, 3+/-2.2 and 0+/-2.0mm, p = 0.025) and the thigh (2+/-2.0 and 0+/-5.9mm, p = 0.031). The qualitative conclusions based on interpretation of the calculated estimates of effects within the longitudinal mixed-effects modelling evaluation of the data for the two groups (separately) were effectively identical. The soft-tissue artefacts across knee flexion angle could not be distinguished from zero for both groups. For all cases, recorded soft-tissue artefacts were less variable within subjects than between subjects. The large soft-tissue artefacts, when using clustered skin markers, irrespective of the fixation method, question the usefulness of parameters found with external movement registration and clinical interpretation of stair data in small patient groups.     

Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics

Shoulder motion is complex and significant research efforts have focused on measuring glenohumeral joint motion. Unfortunately, conventional motion measurement techniques are unable to measure glenohumeral joint kinematics during dynamic shoulder motion to clinically significant levels of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. We have developed a model-based tracking technique for accurately measuring in vivo joint motion from biplane radiographic images that tracks the position of bones based on their three-dimensional shape and texture. To validate this technique, we implanted tantalum beads into the humerus and scapula of both shoulders from three cadaver specimens and then recorded biplane radiographic images of the shoulder while manually moving each specimen's arm. The position of the humerus and scapula were measured using the model-based tracking system and with a previously validated dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) technique. Accuracy was reported in terms of measurement bias, measurement precision, and overall dynamic accuracy by comparing the model-based tracking results to the dynamic RSA results. The model-based tracking technique produced results that were in excellent agreement with the RSA technique. Measurement bias ranged from -0.126 to 0.199 mm for the scapula and ranged from -0.022 to 0.079 mm for the humerus. Dynamic measurement precision was better than 0.130 mm for the scapula and 0.095 mm for the humerus. Overall dynamic accuracy indicated that rms errors in any one direction were less than 0.385 mm for the scapula and less than 0.374 mm for the humerus. These errors correspond to rotational inaccuracies of approximately 0.25 deg for the scapula and 0.47 deg for the humerus. This new model-based tracking approach represents a non-invasive technique for accurately measuring dynamic glenohumeral joint motion under in vivo conditions. The model-based technique achieves accuracy levels that far surpass all previously reported non-invasive techniques for measuring in vivo glenohumeral joint motion. This technique is supported by a rigorous validation study that provides a realistic simulation of in vivo conditions and we fully expect to achieve these levels of accuracy with in vivo human testing. Future research will use this technique to analyze shoulder motion under a variety of testing conditions and to investigate the effects of conservative and surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears on dynamic joint stability.     

Approximation of the functional kinematics of posterior stabilised total knee replacements using a two-dimensional sagittal plane patello-femoral model: comparing model approximation to in vivo measurement

Previous in vivo studies have observed that current designs of posterior stabilised (PS) total knee replacements (TKRs) may be ineffective in restoring normal kinematics in Late flexion. Computer-based models can prove a useful tool in improving PS knee replacement designs. This study investigates the accuracy of a two-dimensional (2D) sagittal plane model capable of predicting the functional sagittal plane kinematics of PS TKR implanted knees against direct in vivo measurement. Implant constraints are often used as determinants of anterior–posterior tibio-femoral positioning. This allowed the use of a patello-femoral modelling approach to determine the effect of implant constraints. The model was executed using motion simulation software which uses the constraint force algorithm to achieve a solution. A group of 10 patients implanted with Scorpio PS implants were recruited and underwent fluoroscopic imaging of their knees. The fluoroscopic images were used to determine relative implant orientation using a three-dimensional reconstruction method. The determined relative tibio-femoral orientations were then input to the model. The model calculated the patella tendon angles (PTAs) which were then compared with those measured from the in vivo fluoroscopic images. There were no significant differences between the measured and calculated PTAs. The average root mean square error between measured and modelled ranged from 1.17° to 2.10° over the flexion range. A sagittal plane patello-femoral model could conceivably be used to predict the functional 2D kinematics of an implanted knee joint. This may prove particularly useful in optimising PS designs.     

Feasibility of using a video-based motion analysis system for measuring thumb kinematics

While several different methods have been used to measure hand kinematics, fluoroscopy is generally considered to be the most accurate. Recently, video-based motion analysis has been developed for the measurement of joint kinematics. This method is versatile, easy to use, and can measure motions dynamically. Surface markers are most commonly used in the video-based motion systems. However, whether the surface markers placed on the thumb accurately represent the true kinematics of the underlying bony segment is questionable.In this study, the feasibility of surface markers to represent thumb kinematics was investigated by fluoroscopy. Both the positions of surface markers and bony landmarks were simultaneous recorded and then digitized. The Ra(2) values comparing the angular changes of the thumb interphalangeal, metacarpal and carpometacarpal joints derived using the surface markers or bony landmarks were 0.9986, 0.9730 and 0.9186 in the flexion/extension plane respectively, 0.8837, 0.9697 and 0.8775 in the abduction/adduction plane; and 0.9884, 0.9643 and 0.9431 in the opposition plane. The ranges, mean and standard deviation of the absolute differences between calculated angles of different marker sets were also compared. These data revealed that the similarities of the two different marker techniques throughout the motion cycle were high. The differences between the two methods were also within clinically allowable range of +/-5 degrees. It is concluded that the application of the video-based motion analysis system with surface markers to thumb kinematics is warranted.     

Image-based RSA: Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis based on 2D-3D image registration

Image-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (IBRSA) integrates 2D-3D image registration and conventional RSA. Instead of radiopaque RSA bone markers, IBRSA uses 3D CT data, from which digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are generated. Using 2D-3D image registration, the 3D pose of the CT is iteratively adjusted such that the generated DRRs resemble the 2D RSA images as closely as possible, according to an image matching metric. Effectively, by registering all 2D follow-up moments to the same 3D CT, the CT volume functions as common ground. In two experiments, using RSA and using a micromanipulator as gold standard, IBRSA has been validated on cadaveric and sawbone scapula radiographs, and good matching results have been achieved. The accuracy was: |mu |< 0.083 mm for translations and |mu| < 0.023 degrees for rotations. The precision sigma in x-, y-, and z-direction was 0.090, 0.077, and 0.220 mm for translations and 0.155 degrees , 0.243 degrees , and 0.074 degrees for rotations. Our results show that the accuracy and precision of in vitro IBRSA, performed under ideal laboratory conditions, are lower than in vitro standard RSA but higher than in vivo standard RSA. Because IBRSA does not require radiopaque markers, it adds functionality to the RSA method by opening new directions and possibilities for research, such as dynamic analyses using fluoroscopy on subjects without markers and computer navigation applications.     

Linkage mapping in populations with karyotypic rearrangements

A simulation study was used to examine the consequences of karyotypic rearrangements on molecular genetic map construction. Two groups of 50 datasets were created for F2 populations segregating for a reciprocal translocation of chromosomal segments or a reciprocal translocation and inversion. Multiple attempts were made to construct maps for each dataset using MapMaker/EXP. As expected, the markers from segments involved in the translocation formed one linkage group. Maps that corresponded to the known marker order within a segment could be constructed by the following method. The separation of markers distal to the translocation breakpoints into their respective segments could be made by constructing multiple maps, using distinct orders of marker entry, and observing the variances in intermarker distances: variances between pairs of markers from the same segment were an order of magnitude less compared to pairs where markers were from different segments. The order of markers within a segment could be determined from combining the pairwise linkage results from multiple maps, or from maps including all markers from a segment. No bias in map distances was observed. These results indicate that, under conditions similar to those tested, genetic maps corresponding to the segments conserved in translocations can be constructed.     

Relationships between growth at the sutures of the rabbit calvarium

The present study was designed to elucidate the relationships between growth increments at the cranial vault sutures in rabbits. Thirteen male New Zealand white rabbits were followed regularly from age 31 to 142 days using a roentgen stereophotogrammetric system. Spherical tantalum markers were implanted into the nasal, frontal, and parietal bones, and implant stability was checked at each stereo examination. Problems with instability were encountered only in the nasal bones. Registered growth rates conformed to our previous investigations. High correlations were observed between the following areas; the coronal suture to the frontonasal suture, the first principal component of the neurocranial suture group to the frontonasal suture, and the principal component of the craniofacial suture group to the coronal suture. Remaining relationships demonstrated dispersion to various extents. The findings indicate that there seems to exist a basic mutual dependence between neural and facial skeletal growth, as well as complex covariations between the various sutures of the rabbit calvarium.     

Precision measurements of the RSA method using a phantom model of hip prosthesis

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has become one of the recommended techniques for pre-market evaluation of new joint implant designs. In this study we evaluated the effect of repositioning of X-ray tubes and phantom model on the precision of the RSA method. In precision measurements, we utilized mean error of rigid body fitting (ME) values as an internal control for examinations. ME value characterizes relative motion among the markers within each rigid body and is conventionally used to detect loosening of a bone marker. Three experiments, each consisting of 10 double examinations, were performed. In the first experiment, the X-ray tubes and the phantom model were not repositioned between one double examination. In experiments two and three, the X-ray tubes were repositioned between one double examination. In addition, the position of the phantom model was changed in experiment three. Results showed that significant differences could be found in 2 of 12 comparisons when evaluating the translation and rotation of the prosthetic components. Repositioning procedures increased ME values mimicking deformation of rigid body segments. Thus, ME value seemed to be a more sensitive parameter than migration values in this study design. These results confirmed the importance of standardized radiographic technique and accurate patient positioning for RSA measurements. Standardization and calibration procedures should be performed with phantom models in order to avoid unnecessary radiation dose of the patients. The present model gives the means to establish and to follow the intra-laboratory precision of the RSA method. The model is easily applicable in any research unit and allows the comparison of the precision values in different laboratories of multi-center trials.     

A combined RSA and FE study of the implanted proximal tibia: correlation of the post-operative mechanical environment with implant migration

There is strong evidence to suggest that inducible displacements, migration and implant loosening are closely related to the initial mechanical environment of the implanted tibia. If this is true, then it should be possible to predict the likelihood of implant migration using patient-specific finite element models. Finite element models of the proximal implanted tibiae were analysed based on pre-operative quantitative computed tomography data of four patients entered into a radiographic migration study. These four patients were also part of an radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study. A variety of load cases were analysed and the risk of bone failure determined for a 2 mm layer of bone immediately beneath the tibial tray. The results were compared with the RSA data measured 1 year post-operatively for each patient. For each patient, an appropriate load case was selected based on patient weight and on the varus-valgus migrations observed in the migration study. The two patients with press-fit implants were predicted to have the highest risk of failure and were found to migrate the most. The two patients with bonded implants (one HA coated and one cemented) were found to have a low risk of failure and these implants migrated the least. This study suggests that the degree of implant migration is dependent on the initial mechanical environment and can be determined using patient-specific finite element analysis.     

Low-dose CT imaging of radio-opaque markers for assessing human rotator cuff repair: accuracy, repeatability and the effect of arm position

Previous studies have used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to assess the integrity and mechanical properties of repaired tendons and ligament grafts. A conceptually similar approach is to use CT imaging to measure the 3D position and distance between implanted markers. The purpose of this study was to quantify the accuracy and repeatability of measuring the position and distance between metallic markers placed in the rotator cuff using low-dose CT imaging. We also investigated the effect of repeated or variable positions of the arm on position and distance measures. Six human patients had undergone rotator cuff repair and placement of tantalum beads in the rotator cuff at least one year prior to participating in this study. On a single day each patient underwent nine low-dose CT scans in seven unique arm positions. CT scans were analyzed to assess bias, precision and RMS error of the measurement technique. The effect of repeated or variable positions of the arm on the 3D position of the beads and the distance between these beads and suture anchors in the humeral head were also assessed. Results showed the CT imaging method is accurate and repeatable to within 0.7 mm. Further, measures of bead position and anchor-to-bead distance are influenced by arm position and location of the bead within the rotator cuff. Beads located in the posterior rotator cuff moved medially as much as 20 mm in abduction or external rotation. When clinically relevant CT arm positions such as the hand on umbilicus or at side were repeated, bead position varied less than 4 mm in any anatomic direction and anchor-to-bead distance varied +2.8 to -1.6 mm (RMS 1.3 mm). We conclude that a range of ± 3 mm is a conservative estimate of the uncertainty in anchor-to-bead distance for patients repeatedly scanned in clinically-relevant arm positions.     

Variability of measurements of cranial growth in the rabbit

This study concerns techniques used in experimental cranial growth research: roentgen cephalometry, roentgen stereophotogrammetry, and gross measurements (osteometry). A comparison of the precision of these methods has not been found in the literature. Computation of technical errors is fundamental to the sound evaluation of registered findings, and such a presentation must be obligatory in all biometric reports. We compared the measurement error of roentgen cephalometric and osteometric data with that obtained by roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA). RSA demonstrates a superior replicability, and this technique gives possibilities for kinematic and volumetric determinations simultaneously with distance evaluation. Roentgen cephalometry has the advantage of enabling distance and angular measurements between any well-defined skeletal points or lines. This technique, preferably after implantation of bone markers, is a reliable alternative, but optimal results necessitates calculations of the magnification factor for each bone segment involved. Direct osteometry does not contribute additional information, but problems of image magnification are omitted. Preferably, one individual should perform all measurements regardless of the method used. Growth rates and values calculated by one technique cannot be directly transformed to some other approach. In all probability, assessments of distance changes would gain substantially by using one technical approach consistently throughout actual age intervals. The least variable measurements of sutural growth are made for sutures growing primarily in one plane and with substantial growth rates. One must realize that differences among studies may be due to the limitations of, in particular, the cephalometric and osteometric techniques.     

Patellar mechanics during simulated kneeling in the natural and implanted knee

Kneeling is required during daily living for many patients after total knee replacement (TKR), yet many patients have reported that they cannot kneel due to pain, or avoid kneeling due to discomfort, which critically impacts quality of life and perceived success of the TKR procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of component design on patellofemoral (PF) mechanics during a kneeling activity. A computational model to predict natural and implanted PF kinematics and bone strains after kneeling was developed and kinematics were validated with experimental cadaveric studies. PF joint kinematics and patellar bone strains were compared for implants with dome, medialized dome, and anatomic components. Due to the less conforming nature of the designs, change in sagittal plane tilt as a result of kneeling at 90° knee flexion was approximately twice as large for the medialized-dome and dome implants as the natural case or anatomic implant, which may result in additional stretching of the quadriceps. All implanted cases resulted in substantial increases in bone strains compared with the natural knee, but increased strains in different regions. The anatomic patella demonstrated increased strains inferiorly, while the dome and medialized dome showed increases centrally. An understanding of the effect of implant design on patellar mechanics during kneeling may ultimately provide guidance to component designs that reduces the likelihood of knee pain and patellar fracture during kneeling.