Cross-species investigation of the functions of the Rhodobacter PufX polypeptide and the composition of the RC–LH1 core complex

In well-characterised species of the Rhodobacter (Rba.) genus of purple photosynthetic bacteria it is known that the photochemical reaction centre (RC) is intimately-associated with an encircling LH1 antenna pigment protein, and this LH1 antenna is prevented from completely surrounding the RC by a single copy of the PufX protein. In Rba. veldkampii only monomeric RC–LH1 complexes are assembled in the photosynthetic membrane, whereas in Rba. sphaeroides and Rba. blasticus a dimeric form is also assembled in which two RCs are surrounded by an S-shaped LH1 antenna. The present work established that dimeric RC–LH1 complexes can also be isolated from Rba. azotoformans and Rba. changlensis, but not from Rba. capsulatus or Rba. vinaykumarii. The compositions of the monomers and dimers isolated from these four species of Rhodobacter were similar to those of the well-characterised RC–LH1 complexes present in Rba. sphaeroides. Pigment proteins were also isolated from strains of Rba. sphaeroides expressing chimeric RC–LH1 complexes. Replacement of either the Rba. sphaeroides LH1 antenna or PufX with its counterpart from Rba. capsulatus led to a loss of the dimeric form of the RC–LH1 complex, but the monomeric form had a largely unaltered composition, even in strains in which the expression level of LH1 relative to the RC was reduced. The chimeric RC–LH1 complexes were also functional, supporting bacterial growth under photosynthetic conditions. The findings help to tease apart the different functions of PufX in different species of Rhodobacter, and a specific protein structural arrangement that allows PufX to fulfil these three functions is proposed.     

Demonstration of the Key Role Played by the PufX Protein in the Functional and Structural Organization of Native and Hybrid Bacterial Photosynthetic Core Complexes

The role of a component of the bacterial photosystem, the PufX protein, was examined by heterologous expression of the pufX gene from Rhodobacter capsulatus in a strain of R. sphaeroides that lacks the native pufX gene. The strain of R. sphaeroides containing the R. capsulatus PufX protein was capable of efficient transduction of light energy despite a low degree of sequence conservation between the PufX proteins from the two species. The organization of the hybrid reaction center/LH1 photosystem in strains of R. sphaeroides containing the R. capsulatus LH1 antenna complex was affected differently by the R. sphaeroides and R. capsulatus PufX proteins. We discuss the implications of our findings for the role of the PufX protein in organizing the bacterial photosystem for efficient transduction of light energy.     

Native architecture of the photosynthetic membrane from Rhodobacter veldkampii

The photosynthetic membrane in purple bacteria contains several pigment–protein complexes that assure light capture and establishment of the chemiosmotic gradient. The bioenergetic tasks of the photosynthetic membrane require the strong interaction between these various complexes. In the present work, we acquired the first images of the native outer membrane architecture and the supramolecular organization of the photosynthetic apparatus in vesicular chromatophores of Rhodobacter (Rb.) veldkampii. Mixed with LH2 (light-harvesting complex 2) rings, the PufX-containing LH1–RC (light-harvesting complex 1 – reaction center) core complexes appear as C-shaped monomers, with random orientations in the photosynthetic membrane. Within the LH1 fence surrounding the RC, a remarkable gap that is probably occupied (or partially occupied) by PufX is visualized. Sequence alignment revealed that one specific region in PufX may be essential for PufX-induced core dimerization. In this region of ten amino acids in length all Rhodobacter species had five conserved amino acids, with the exception of Rb. veldkampii. Our findings provide direct evidence that the presence of PufX in Rb. veldkampii does not directly govern the dimerization of LH1–RC core complexes in the native membrane. It is indicated, furthermore, that the high membrane curvature of Rb. veldkampii chromatophores (Rb. veldkampii features equally small vesicular chromatophores alike Rb. sphaeroides) is not due to membrane bending induced by dimeric RC–LH1–PufX cores, as it has been proposed in Rb. sphaeroides.     

Variation in supramolecular organisation of the photosynthetic membrane of Rhodobacter sphaeroides induced by alteration of PufX

In purple bacteria of the genus Rhodobacter (Rba.), an LH1 antenna complex surrounds the photochemical reaction centre (RC) with a PufX protein preventing the LH1 complex from completely encircling the RC. In membranes of Rba. sphaeroides, RC–LH1 complexes associate as dimers which in turn assemble into longer range ordered arrays. The present work uses linear dichroism (LD) and dark-minus-light difference LD (ΔLD) to probe the organisation of genetically altered RC–LH1 complexes in intact membranes. The data support previous proposals that Rba. capsulatus, and Rba. sphaeroides heterologously expressing the PufX protein from Rba. capsulatus, produce monomeric core complexes in membranes that lack long-range order. Similarly, Rba. sphaeroides with a point mutation in the Gly 51 residue of PufX, which is located on the membrane-periplasm interface, assembles mainly non-ordered RC–LH1 complexes that are most likely monomeric. All the Rba. sphaeroides membranes in their ΔLD spectra exhibited a spectral fingerprint of small degree of organisation implying the possibility of ordering influence of LH1, and leading to an important conclusion that PufX itself has no influence on ordering RC–LH1 complexes, as long-range order appears to be induced only through its role of configuring RC–LH1 complexes into dimers.     

Characterization of a mutant strain of Rhodovulum sulfidophilum lacking the pufA and pufB genes encoding the polypeptides for the light-harvesting complex 1 (B 870)

Contradictory results on the effectiveness of energy transfer from the light harvesting complex 2 (LH2) directly to the reaction center (RC) in mutant strains lacking the core light-harvesting complex 1 (LH1) have been obtained with cells of Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. A LH1⁻ mutant of Rhodovulum sulfidophilum, named rsLRI, was constructed by deletion of the pufBA genes, resulting in a kanamycin resistant photosynthetically positive clone. To restore the wild type phenotype, a complemented strain C2 was constructed by inserting in trans a DNA segment containing the pufBA genes. Light-induced FTIR difference spectra indicate that the RC in the rsLRI mutant and in the C2 complemented strains are functionally and structurally identical with those in the wild type strain, demonstrating that the assembly and the function of the RC is not impaired by the LH1 deletion. The photosynthetic growth rate of the rsLRI strain increased with decreasing light intensity. At 50 W m⁻² no photosynthetic growth was observed. These results indicate that the light energy harvested by the LH2 complex was not or inefficiently transferred to the RC; thus most of the energy necessary for photosynthetic growth is in the LH1⁻ strain directly absorbed by the RC. It is supposed that in the mutant strain, RC and LH2 cannot interact in an efficient way.     

Interaction of bacteriochlorophyll with the LH1 and PufX polypeptides of photosynthetic bacteria: use of chemically synthesized analogs and covalently attached fluorescent probes

The protein components of the reaction center (RC) and core light-harvesting (LH 1) complexes of photosynthetic bacteria have evolved to specifically, but non-covalently, bind bacteriochlorophyll (Bchl). The contribution to binding of specific structural elements in the protein and Bchl may be determined for the LH 1 complex because its subunit can be studied by reconstitution under equilibrium conditions. Important to the determination and utilization of such information is the characterization of the interacting molecular species. To aid in this characterization, a fluorescent probe molecule has been covalently attached to each of the LH 1 polypeptides. The fluorescent probes were selected for optimal absorption and emission properties in order to facilitate their unique excitation and to enable the detection of energy transfer to Bchl. Oregon Green 488 carboxylic acid and 7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carboxylic acid seemed to fulfill these requirements. Each of these probes were utilized to derivatize the LH1 β-polypeptide of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. It was demonstrated that the β-polypeptides did not interact with each other in the absence of Bchl. When Bchl was present, the probe-labeled β-polypeptides interacted with Bchl to form subunit-type complexes much as those formed with the native polypeptides. Energy transfer from the probe to Bchl occurred with a high efficiency. The α-polypeptide from LH 1 of Rb. sphaeroides and that from Rhodospirillum rubrum were also derivatized in the same manner. Since these polypeptides do not oligomerize in the absence of a β-polypeptide, reversible binding of a single Bchl to a single polypeptide could be measured. Dissociation constants for complex formation were estimated. The relevance of these data to earlier studies of equilibria involving subunit complexes is discussed. Also involved in the photoreceptor complex of Rb. sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus is another protein referred to as PufX. Two large segments of this protein were chemically synthesized, one reproducing the amino acid sequence of the core segment predicted for Rb. sphaeroides PufX and the other reproducing the amino acid sequence predicted for the core segment of Rb. capsulatus PufX. Each polypeptide was covalently labeled with a fluorescent probe and tested for energy transfer to Bchl. Each was found to bind Bchl with an affinity similar to the affinity of the LH 1 polypeptides for Bchl. It is suggested that PufX binds Bchl and interacts with a Bchlċα-polypeptide component of LH 1 to truncate, or interupt, the LH 1 ring adjacent to the location of the Q_B binding site of the RC. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The photosynthetic deficiency due to puhC gene deletion in Rhodobacter capsulatus suggests a PuhC protein-dependent process of RC/LH1/PufX complex reorganization

Optimal photosynthetic reaction centre (RC) and core antenna (LH1) levels in the purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus require the puhC gene. Deletion of puhC had little effect on RC and LH1 assembly individually, but significantly inhibited the photosynthetic growth of RC+ LH1- strains, suggesting that maximal RC catalytic activity is PuhC-dependent. Consistent with post-assembly reorganization of the RC/LH1/PufX core complex by PuhC to include latecomer proteins, spatial separation of pufX from the RC/LH1 genes inhibited PufX accumulation and photosynthetic growth only in PuhC- strains. Photosynthetic activity improved to different degrees when PuhC homologues from three other species were expressed in PuhC- R. capsulatus, indicating that PuhC homologues function similarly but may interact inefficiently with a heterologous core complex. Anaerobic photosynthetic growth of PuhC- strains was affected by the duration of prior semiaerobic growth, and by two genes that modulate bacteriochlorophyll production: pufQ and puhE. These observations agree with a speculative model in which reorganization of the core complex is an important regenerative process, accelerated by PuhC.     

Role of the N- and C-terminal regions of the PufX protein in the structural organization of the photosynthetic core complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

The core complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is formed by the association of the light-harvesting antenna 1 (LH1) and the reaction center (RC). The PufX protein is essential for photosynthetic growth; it is located within the core in a 1 : 1 stoichiometry with the RC. PufX is required for a fast ubiquinol exchange between the Q(B) site of the RC and the Qo site of the cytochrome bc1 complex. In vivo the LH1-PufX-RC complex is assembled in a dimeric form, where PufX is involved as a structural organizer. We have modified the PufX protein at the N and the C-terminus with progressive deletions. The nine mutants obtained have been characterized for their ability for photosynthetic growth, the insertion of PufX in the core LH1-RC complex, the stability of the dimers and the kinetics of flash-induced reduction of cytochrome b561 of the cytochrome bc1 complex. Deletion of 18 residues at the N-terminus destabilizes the dimer in vitro without preventing photosynthetic growth. The dimer (or a stable dimer) does not seem to be a necessary requisite for the photosynthetic phenotype. Partial C-terminal deletions impede the insertion of PufX, while the complete absence of the C-terminus leads to the insertion of a PufX protein composed of only its first 53 residues and does not affect the photosynthetic growth of the bacterium. Overall, the results point to a complex role of the N and C domains in the structural organization of the core complex; the N-terminus is suggested to be responsible mainly for dimerization, while the C-terminus is thought to be involved mainly in PufX assembly.     

Overexpression of Rhodobacter sphaeroides PufX-bearing maltose-binding protein and its effect on the stability of reconstituted light-harvesting core antenna complex

The PufX protein, encoded by the pufX gene of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, plays a key role in the organization and function of the core antenna (LH1)-reaction centre (RC) complex, which collects photons and triggers primary photochemical reactions. We synthesized a PufX/maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion protein to study the effect of the PufX protein on the reconstitution of B820 subunit-type and LH1-type complexes. The fusion protein was synthesized using an Escherichia coli expression system and purified by affinity chromatography. Reconstitution experiments demonstrated that the MBP-PufX protein destabilizes the subunit-type complex (20°C), consistent with previous reports. Interestingly, however, the preformed LH1-type complex was stable in the presence of MBP-PufX. The MBP-PufX protein did not influence the preformed LH1-type complexes (4°C). The LH1-type complex containing MBP-PufX showed a unique temperature-dependent structural transformation that was irreversible. The predominant form of the complex at 4°C was the LH1-type. When shifted to 20°C, subunit-type complexes became predominant. Upon subsequent cooling back to 4°C, instead of re-forming the LH1-type complexes, the predominant form remained the subunit-type complexes. In contrast, reversible transformation of LH1 (4°C) and subunit-type complexes (20°C) occurs in the absence of PufX. These results are consistent with the suggestion that MBP-PufX interacts with the LH1α- polypeptide in the subunit (α/β)-type complex (at 20°C), preventing oligomerization of the subunit to form LH1-type complexes.     

Structure of the dimeric RC–LH1–PufX complex from Rhodobaca bogoriensis investigated by electron microscopy

Electron microscopy and single-particle averaging were performed on isolated reaction centre (RC)—antenna complexes (RC–LH1–PufX complexes) of Rhodobaca bogoriensis strain LBB1, with the aim of establishing the LH1 antenna conformation, and, in particular, the structural role of the PufX protein. Projection maps of dimeric complexes were obtained at 13 Å resolution and show the positions of the 2 × 14 LH1 α- and β-subunits. This new dimeric complex displays two open, C-shaped LH1 aggregates of 13 αβ polypeptides partially surrounding the RCs plus two LH1 units forming the dimer interface in the centre. Between the interface and the two half rings are two openings on each side. Next to the openings, there are four additional densities present per dimer, considered to be occupied by four copies of PufX. The position of the RC in our model was verified by comparison with RC–LH1–PufX complexes in membranes. Our model differs from previously proposed configurations for Rhodobacter species in which the LH1 ribbon is continuous in the shape of an S, and the stoichiometry is of one PufX per RC.     

Characterization of a Highly Purified, Fully Active, Crystallizable RC–LH1–PufX Core Complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Photosynthetic complexes in bacteria absorb light and undergo photochemistry with high quantum efficiency. We describe the isolation of a highly purified, active, reaction center-light-harvesting 1–PufX complex (RC–LH1–PufX core complex) from a strain of the photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, which lacks the light-harvesting 2 (LH2) and contains a 6 histidine tag on the H subunit of the RC. The complex was solubilized with diheptanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DHPC), and purified by Ni-affinity, size-exclusion and ion-exchange chromatography in dodecyl maltoside. SDS-PAGE analysis shows the complex to be highly purified. The quantum efficiency was determined by measuring the charge separation (DQ_A → D⁺Q_A^-) in the RC as a function of light intensity. The RC–LH1–PufX complex had a quantum efficiency of 0.95 ± 0.05, indicating full activity. The stoichiometry of LH1 subunits per RC was determined by two independent methods: (i) solvent extraction and absorbance spectroscopy of bacteriochlorophyll, and (ii) density scanning of the SDS-PAGE bands. The average stoichiometry from the two measurements was 13.3 ± 0.9 LH1/RC. The presence of PufX was observed in SDS-PAGE gels at a stoichiometry of 1.1 ± 0.1/RC. Crystals of the core complex have been obtained which diffract X-rays to 12 Å. A preliminary analysis of the space group and unit cell analysis indicated a P1 space group with unit cell dimensions of a = 76.3 Å, b = 137.2 Å, c = 137.5 Å; α = 60.0°, β = 89.95°, γ =90.02°.     

The PuhB protein of Rhodobacter capsulatus functions in photosynthetic reaction center assembly with a secondary effect on light-harvesting complex 1

The core of the photosynthetic apparatus of purple photosynthetic bacteria such as Rhodobacter capsulatus consists of a reaction center (RC) intimately associated with light-harvesting complex 1 (LH1) and the PufX polypeptide. The abundance of the RC and LH1 components was previously shown to depend on the product of the puhB gene (formerly known as orf214). We report here that disruption of puhB diminishes RC assembly, with an indirect effect on LH1 assembly, and reduces the amount of PufX. Under semiaerobic growth conditions, the core complex was present at a reduced level in puhB mutants. After transfer of semiaerobically grown cultures to photosynthetic (anaerobic illuminated) conditions, the RC/LH1 complex became only slightly more abundant, and the amount of PufX increased as cells began photosynthetic growth. We discovered that the photosynthetic growth of puhB disruption strains of R. capsulatus starts after a long lag period, which is due to physiological adaptation rather than secondary mutations. Using a hybrid protein expression system, we determined that the three predicted transmembrane segments of PuhB are capable of spanning a cell membrane and that the second transmembrane segment could mediate self-association of PuhB. We discuss the possible function of PuhB as a dimeric RC assembly factor.     

Molecular architecture of photosynthetic membranes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: the role of PufX

The effects of the PufX polypeptide on membrane architecture were investigated by comparing the composition and structures of photosynthetic membranes from PufX+ and PufX- strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. We show that this single polypeptide profoundly affects membrane morphology, leading to highly elongated cells containing extended tubular membranes. Purified tubular membranes contain helical arrays composed solely of dimeric RC-LH1-PufX (RC, reaction centre; LH, light harvesting) complexes with apparently open LH1 rings. PufX- cells contain crystalline membranes with a pseudo-hexagonal packing of monomeric core complexes. Analysis of purified complexes by electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy shows that LH1 and PufX form a continuous ring of protein around each RC. A model of the tubular membrane is presented with PufX located adjacent to the stained region created by a vacant LH1beta. This arrangement, coupled with a flexible ring, would give the RC QB site transient access to the interstices in the lattice, which might be of functional importance. We discuss the implications of our data for the export of quinol from the RC, for eventual reduction of the cytochrome bc1 complex.     

Protein-Induced Membrane Curvature Investigated through Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting

In the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides, light is absorbed by membrane-bound light-harvesting (LH) proteins LH1 and LH2. LH1 directly surrounds the reaction center (RC) and, together with PufX, forms a dimeric (RC-LH1-PufX)₂ protein complex. In LH2-deficient Rba. sphaeroides mutants, RC-LH1-PufX dimers aggregate into tubular vesicles with a radius of ∼250-550 Å, making RC-LH1-PufX one of the few integral membrane proteins known to actively induce membrane curvature. Recently, a three-dimensional electron microscopy density map showed that the Rba. sphaeroides RC-LH1-PufX dimer exhibits a prominent bend at its dimerizing interface. To investigate the curvature properties of this highly bent protein, we employed molecular dynamics simulations to fit an all-atom structural model of the RC-LH1-PufX dimer within the electron microscopy density map. The simulations reveal how the dimer produces a membrane with high local curvature, even though the location of PufX cannot yet be determined uniquely. The resulting membrane curvature agrees well with the size of RC-LH1-PufX tubular vesicles, and demonstrates how the local curvature properties of the RC-LH1-PufX dimer propagate to form the observed long-range organization of the Rba. sphaeroides tubular vesicles.     

PucC and LhaA direct efficient assembly of the light‐harvesting complexes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The mature architecture of the photosynthetic membrane of the purple phototroph Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been characterised to a level where an atomic‐level membrane model is available, but the roles of the putative assembly proteins LhaA and PucC in establishing this architecture are unknown. Here we investigate the assembly of light‐harvesting LH2 and reaction centre‐light‐harvesting1‐PufX (RC‐LH1‐PufX) photosystem complexes using spectroscopy, pull‐downs, native gel electrophoresis, quantitative mass spectrometry and fluorescence lifetime microscopy to characterise a series of lhaA and pucC mutants. LhaA and PucC are important for specific assembly of LH1 or LH2 complexes, respectively, but they are not essential; the few LH1 subunits found in ΔlhaA mutants assemble to form normal RC‐LH1‐PufX core complexes showing that, once initiated, LH1 assembly round the RC is cooperative and proceeds to completion. LhaA and PucC form oligomers at sites of initiation of membrane invagination; LhaA associates with RCs, bacteriochlorophyll synthase (BchG), the protein translocase subunit YajC and the YidC membrane protein insertase. These associations within membrane nanodomains likely maximise interactions between pigments newly arriving from BchG and nascent proteins within the SecYEG‐SecDF‐YajC‐YidC assembly machinery, thereby co‐ordinating pigment delivery, the co‐translational insertion of LH polypeptides and their folding and assembly to form photosynthetic complexes.     

Cross-species investigation of the functions of the Rhodobacter PufX polypeptide and the composition of the RC-LH1 core complex

In well-characterised species of the Rhodobacter (Rba.) genus of purple photosynthetic bacteria it is known that the photochemical reaction centre (RC) is intimately-associated with an encircling LH1 antenna pigment protein, and this LH1 antenna is prevented from completely surrounding the RC by a single copy of the PufX protein. In Rba. veldkampii only monomeric RC-LH1 complexes are assembled in the photosynthetic membrane, whereas in Rba. sphaeroides and Rba. blasticus a dimeric form is also assembled in which two RCs are surrounded by an S-shaped LH1 antenna. The present work established that dimeric RC-LH1 complexes can also be isolated from Rba. azotoformans and Rba. changlensis, but not from Rba. capsulatus or Rba. vinaykumarii. The compositions of the monomers and dimers isolated from these four species of Rhodobacter were similar to those of the well-characterised RC-LH1 complexes present in Rba. sphaeroides. Pigment proteins were also isolated from strains of Rba. sphaeroides expressing chimeric RC-LH1 complexes. Replacement of either the Rba. sphaeroides LH1 antenna or PufX with its counterpart from Rba. capsulatus led to a loss of the dimeric form of the RC-LH1 complex, but the monomeric form had a largely unaltered composition, even in strains in which the expression level of LH1 relative to the RC was reduced. The chimeric RC-LH1 complexes were also functional, supporting bacterial growth under photosynthetic conditions. The findings help to tease apart the different functions of PufX in different species of Rhodobacter, and a specific protein structural arrangement that allows PufX to fulfil these three functions is proposed.     

Characterization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus and Proteome of Roseobacter denitrificans

The phototrophic capacity of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria endows them with a selective advantage over other heterotrophic bacteria in the oligotrophic ocean. Here, we reported the phototrophic features and proteome of an aerobic phototrophic bacterium Roseobacter denitrificans under starvation stress. The fluorescence induction and relaxation measurements suggested that the photosynthetic capacity in R. denitrificans was preserved but was lower than in the photoautotrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The existence of light-harvesting complexes (LH1 and LH2) and the reaction center (RC) in the native membrane were demonstrated through atomic force microscopy image analysis as direct evidence of their phototrophy. The homology-based LH1–RC complex structure was proposed in which RC was the Rb. sphaeroides homolog structure surrounded by the LH1. Moreover, the protein expression profiles of cells in the stationary phase under heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions show that light enhanced or activated some proteins such as carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and NifU to cope with the low levels of amino acids and carbon sources under starvation conditions.     

The PufX protein of Rhodobacter capsulatus affects the properties of bacteriochlorophyll a and carotenoid pigments of light-harvesting complex 1

A pufX gene deletion in the purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus causes a severe photosynthetic defect and increases core light-harvesting complex (LH1) protein and bacteriochlorophyll a (BChl) levels. It was suggested that PufX interrupts the LH1 alpha/beta ring around the reaction centre, allowing quinone/quinol exchange. However, naturally PufX(-) purple bacteria grow photosynthetically with an uninterrupted LH1. We discovered that substitutions of the Rhodobacter-specific LH1 alpha seryl-2 decrease carotenoid levels in PufX(-)R. capsulatus. An LH1 alphaS2F mutation improved the photosynthetic growth of a PufX(-) strain lacking the peripheral LH2 antenna, although LH1 BChl absorption remained above wild-type, suggesting that Rhodobacter-specific carotenoid binding is involved in the PufX(-) photosynthetic defect and LH1 expansion is not. Furthermore, PufX overexpression increased LH1-like BChl absorption without inhibiting photosynthetic growth. PufX(+) LH1 alphaS2-substituted mutant strains had wild-type carotenoid levels, indicating that PufX modulates LH1 carotenoid binding, inducing a conformational change that favours quinone/quinol exchange.     

The reaction center-LH1 antenna complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides contains one PufX molecule which is involved in dimerization of this complex.

The PufX membrane protein is essential for photosynthetic growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides wild-type cells. PufX is associated with the reaction center-light harvesting 1 (RC-LH1) core complex and plays a key role in lateral ubiquinone/ubiquinol transfer. We have determined the PufX/RC stoichiometry by quantitative Western blot analysis and RC photobleaching. Independent of copy number effects and growth conditions, one PufX molecule per RC was observed in native membranes as well as in detergent-solubilized RC-LH1 complexes which had been purified over sucrose gradients. Surprisingly, two gradient bands with significantly different sedimentation coefficients were found to have a similar subunit composition, as judged by absorption spectroscopy and protein gel electrophoresis. Gel filtration chromatography and electron microscopy revealed that these membrane complexes represent a monomeric and a dimeric form of the RC-LH1 complex. Since PufX is strictly required for the isolation of dimeric core complexes, we suggest that PufX has a central structural role in forming dimeric RC-LH1 complexes, thus allowing efficient ubiquinone/ubiquinol exchange through the LH1 ring surrounding the RC.     

Selective expression of light-harvesting complexes alters phospholipid composition in the intracytoplasmic membrane and core complex of purple phototrophic bacteria

Phospholipid–protein interactions play important roles in regulating the function and morphology of photosynthetic membranes in purple phototrophic bacteria. Here, we characterize the phospholipid composition of intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) from Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides that has been genetically altered to selectively express light-harvesting (LH) complexes. In the mutant strain (DP2) that lacks a peripheral light-harvesting (LH2) complex, the phospholipid composition was significantly different from that of the wild-type strain; strain DP2 showed a marked decrease in phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and large increases in cardiolipin (CL) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) indicating preferential interactions between the complexes and specific phospholipids. Substitution of the core light-harvesting (LH1) complex of Rba. sphaeroides strain DP2 with that from the purple sulfur bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum further altered the phospholipid composition, with substantial increases in PG and PE and decreases in CL and PC, indicating that the phospholipids incorporated into the ICM depend on the nature of the LH1 complex expressed. Purified LH1–reaction center core complexes (LH1–RC) from the selectively expressing strains also contained different phospholipid compositions than did core complexes from their corresponding wild-type strains, suggesting different patterns of phospholipid association between the selectively expressed LH1–RC complexes and those purified from native strains. Effects of carotenoids on the phospholipid composition were also investigated using carotenoid-suppressed cells and carotenoid-deficient species. The findings are discussed in relation to ICM morphology and specific LH complex–phospholipid interactions.