Aerosolized Delivery of Antifungal Agents

Pulmonary infections caused by Aspergillus species are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Although the treatment of pulmonary fungal infections requires the use of systemic agents, aerosolized delivery is an attractive option in prevention because the drug can concentrate locally at the site of infection with minimal systemic exposure. Current clinical evidence for the use of aerosolized delivery in preventing fungal infections is limited to amphotericin B products, although itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin are under investigation. Based on conflicting results from clinical trials that evaluated various amphotericin B formulations, the routine use of aerosolized delivery cannot be recommended. Further research with well-designed clinical trials is necessary to elucidate the therapeutic role and risks associated with aerosolized delivery of antifungal agents. This article provides an overview of aerosolized delivery systems, the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic properties of aerosolized antifungal agents, and key findings from clinical studies.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Therapeutic efficacy of anidulafungin for the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, candidemia and invasive candidiasis

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin that appears to have several advantages over existing antifungals. It is unique because it slowly degrades in humans, undergoing a process of biotransformation rather than being metabolized. It exhibits high in vitro and in vivo activities against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. In several clinical studies investigating Candida esophagitis; candidemia and invasive candidiasis, the clinical efficacy of this echinocandin was similar, or even superior, to that of established antifungals in candidemia. Antifungal activity against strains no longer susceptible to conventional antifungal agents, such as fluconazole and amphotericin B suggests that anidulafungin can be used as salvage therapy in life-threatening fungal infections. The limited toxicity profile, minimal drug-drug interactions and the fact that does not require dosage adjustment in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, establishes this echinocandin as an attractive new option for the treatment of invasive fungal infections.     

Treatment options in emerging mold infections

Although Zygomycetes, Fusarium spp, and Scedosporium spp are far less frequent causes of invasive fungal disease than Aspergillus and Candida, they are emerging. These types of infections in severely immunocompromised patients have a common feature: a poor clinical response to antifungal therapy. Infection is usually airborne, although local infections in cases of skin trauma are also possible. These fungi are resistant to some common antifungal agents; therefore, surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue, when possible, should be combined with specific systemic antifungal treatment in immunocompromised patients. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, most experience in the treatment of these infections is with amphotericin B. Experience with new antifungal agents is still limited, and recovery from neutropenia remains the main predictor of a favorable outcome.     

Invasive infections due to Clavispora lusitaniae

Three cases of Clavispora lusitaniae invasive fungal infections are reported. All three infections appeared in cancer patients presented with fungaemia, one additionally with meningitis. Two of them were breakthrough -- they developed during therapy with conventional amphotericin B with a dose of 0.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1) . All three were cured: two with intravenous fluconazol and one with an increasing dose (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) of amphotericin B. In one of two breakthrough cases the sensitivity of the strain to antifungals was tested against antifungal agents and showed in vitro resistance to amphotericin B (MIC 2 eta g ml(-1)).     

Using Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Improve Patient Outcomes

In vitro and in vivo studies of available and investigational antifungals have broadened our understanding of the pharmacodynamics of these agents as well as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics that are associated with efficacy. These data are increasingly being used as surrogate means to answer questions about dosing and administration of antimicrobial agents in order to improve outcomes in patients with invasive fungal infections, as these questions are difficult to answer in clinical trials. The objective of this article is to review the pharmacodynamic activity of widely used classes of antifungal agents, including the azoles, amphotericin B, and the echinocandins, discuss the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters associated with efficacy of these agents in preclinical studies, and describe how this information is being translated into the clinical arena to optimize patient outcomes.     

Antifungal activity of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with fluconazole

Fungal infections remain a challenge to clinicians due to the limited available antifungals. With the increasing use of antifungals in clinical practice, drug resistance has been emerging continuously, especially to fluconazole (FLC). Thus, a search for new antifungals and approaches to overcome antifungal resistance is needed. However, the development of new antifungals is usually costly and time consuming; discovering the antifungal activity of non-antifungal agents is one way to address these problems. Interestingly, some researchers have demonstrated that several classes of immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, etc) also displayed potent antifungal activity when used alone or in combination with antifungals, especially with FLC. Some of them could increase FLC's susceptibility against resistant Candida albicans significantly reversing fungal resistance to FLC. This article reviews the antifungal activities of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with antifungals and their potential antifungal mechanisms that have been discovered so far. Although immunosuppressive agents have been identified as risk factors for fungal infection, we believe these findings are very important for overcoming drug resistance and developing new antifungals.     

Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Fungal Diseases in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: An Update

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. While the most common pathogens are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., the incidence of infections caused by non-albicans Candida species as well as molds such as Zygomycetes has increased. For many years, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB-D) was the only available antifungal for the treatment of IFDs. Within the past decade, there has been a surge of new antifungal agents developed and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B provide an effective and less nephrotoxic alternative to AMB-D. Voriconazole has now replaced AMB-D as first choice for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Another extended-spectrum triazole, posaconazole, also appears to be a promising agent in the management of zygomycosis, refractory aspergillosis, and for prophylaxis. Members of the newest antifungal class, the echinocandins, are attractive agents in select infections due to their safety profile, and are a more attractive option compared to AMB-D as initial treatment for invasive candidiasis and (based on one study) challenge fluconazole for superiority in management with this mycoses. However, challenges do exist among these newer agents in very high-risk individuals like allogeneic SCT recipients, which may include adverse drug events, drug–drug interactions, variability in oral absorption, and availability of alternative formulations. The addition of newer agents has also stimulated interest in the potential application of combination therapy in serious, life-threatening infections. However, adequate studies are not available for most IFDs; thus, the clinical use of combination therapy is not evidenced based on most cases and preciseness in its use is uncertain. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring of select antifungals (notably posaconazole and voriconazole) may play an increasing role due to significant interpatient variability in serum concentrations after standard doses.     

Meta-analysis of prophylactic or empirical antifungal treatment versus placebo or no treatment in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether antifungal agents given prophylactically or empirically decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of amphotericin B, various lipid soluble formulations of amphotericin B (for example, AmBisome), fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, or itraconazole compared with placebo or no treatment. SETTING: Trials conducted anywhere in the world. SUBJECTS: Patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, invasive fungal infection (defined as positive blood culture, oesophageal candidiasis, or lung or deep tissue infection), and colonisation. RESULTS: 24 trials with 2758 randomised patients were reviewed; the total number of deaths was 434. Prophylactic or empirical treatment with antifungals as a group bad no effect on mortality (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.14). Amphotericin B decreased mortality significantly (0.58; 0.37 to 0.93) but the studies were small and the difference in number of deaths was only 15. Antifungal treatment decreased the incidence of invasive fungal infection (0.47; 0.35 to 0.64) and fungal colonisation (0.45; 0.30 to 0.69). For every 73 patients treated (95% confidence interval to 48 to 158) one case of fungal invasion was prevented in surviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be no survival benefit of antifungal agents given prophylactically or empirically to patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. These agents should be restricted to patients with proved infection and those in randomised trials. A large, definitive placebo controlled trial of amphotericin B is needed.     

Antifungal agents of the 1980's

The first of the “new” antifungals for systemic administration was clotrimazole (Bayer). Parenterally administered, this agent rapidly induced hepatic inactivating enzymes, and never achieved widespread use. Although miconazole was somewhat more successful, the drug which altered the world of antifungal therapy was ketoconazole. A broad antifungal spectrum, reduced toxicities compared with amphotericin B, and oral administration, all opened new possibilities for future drug development. Combined with the appearance of less toxic alternatives was the sharp increase in candidiasis among leukopenic patients, to the extent of causing up to 25% of deaths in these patients. A second major factor was the appearance of AIDS and huge problems with both mucosal candidiasis and cryptococcosis.Development of antifungals for systemic administration has been stimulated by the high efficacy and reduced toxicity of new drugs, and by increasing numbers of patients with systemic mycoses. Itraconazole and fluconazole are likely to be licensed in the near future-both have unique features that will give them some competing and non-competing roles. Even more potent agents are already entering clinical development, and nonazole antifungals have become the subjects of awakening interest. As recently as a decade ago the question was whether we would ever see alternatives to amphotericin B. Now the question is when amphotericin B will be at long last retired from its supremacy in this small but rapidly increasing field, the systemic mycoses.     

Systemic antifungals. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill non neutropenic patients. For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only available antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin have been recently licensed. These various antifungal agents differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Acr</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">emonium</Emphasis> Species: A Review of the Etiological Agents of Emerging Hyalohyphomycosis

Unusual fungal agents that exist environmentally as saprophytes can often lead to opportunistic infections. Hyalohyphomycosis is a group of fungal infections caused by fungi characterized by hyaline septate hyphae and can infect both immunocompetent as well as immunocompromised patients. Many a times it becomes difficult to distinguish a pathogenic and a contaminant fungus, because many such agents can assume clinical significance depending on circumstances. Subcutaneous and invasive fungal infection due to the emerging hyalohyphomycotic fungus, Acremonium, has drawn the attention of clinicians and microbiologists, as a potential pathogen in patients with and without underlying risk factors. Generally considered to be minimally invasive in the past, genus Acremonium has been responsible for eumycotic mycetomas and focal infections in otherwise healthy individuals. It has also been increasingly implicated in systemic fungal diseases. The management with different antifungals in various clinical situations has been very conflicting and hence needs to be carefully evaluated. This overview is an endeavor to consolidate the available clinical infections due to Acremonium and the recommendations on treatment.     

Is There Still a Place for Conventional Amphotericin B in the Treatment of Neonatal Fungal Infections?

Neonatal invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain an increasing problem associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as late-onset neurodevelopmental implications. Invasive candidiasis remains the leading neonatal IFI. Candida albicans is the fungal species most often affecting this population, although a changing epidemiologic incidence to non-albicans Candida species is reported in some neonatal intensive care units. Many treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult populations, emphasizing the need to establish the optimal antifungal agent, dosage, and duration of therapy in neonates. Historically, conventional amphotericin B has been considered an efficient and safe treatment approach for most neonatal IFIs. More recently, lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been studied, used alone or in combination with other antifungal agents such as azoles or echinocandins. The aim of this article is to review the published experience in the use of amphotericin B formulations to treat neonatal IFIs.     

Sodium chloride treatment of amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Standard of care?

Amphotericin B is an effective therapeutic agent for most systemic or invasive mycoses, but its usefulness is limited by the frequent occurrence of nephrotoxicity. Given the high and increasing frequency of serious fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised patients, the importance of the morbidity caused by this toxicity is substantial. Salt loading may prevent and even reverse amphotericin B-induced azotemia by an unknown mechanism. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a relevant patient group would strengthen the support for this simple, safe therapy, but will not likely be carried out because of practical and ethical considerations. Thus, a few prospective and limited controlled human studies may be the only supportive evidence for using this therapy. Supplementing dietary sodium chloride intake with 150 mEq of sodium chloride daily intravenously or orally beginning when or before amphotericin B therapy is initiated will likely prevent much of the observed nephrotoxicity and should be carried out routinely.     

The role of echinocandins, extended-spectrum azoles, and polyenes to treat opportunistic moulds and Candida

Three classes of antifungals—polyenes, extended-spectrum azoles, and echinocandins—are now available for treating systemic fungal infections. Guidance for the appropriate use of this expanded variety of antifungals may come from recent clinical trials. Extended-spectrum azoles have excellent in vitro activity against Aspergillus and have been shown to improve clinical outcomes. For Zygomycetes, along with the lipid formulations of amphotericin, of the new agents, only posaconazole has activity. For Candida, the echinocandins offer a broad spectrum of activity. These new agents offer less toxicity and potentially improved efficacy in these difficult infections.     

Amphotericin B

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficient individuals (such as AIDS patients) and in transplant recipients or tumor patients undergoing immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Amphotericin B is one of the oldest, yet most efficient antimycotic agents. However, its usefulness is limited due to dose-dependent side-effects, notably nephrotoxicity. In order to improve its safety margin, new pharmaceutical formulations of amphotericin B have been designed especially to reduce its detrimental effects on the kidneys. Since the 1980s, a wide variety of new amphotericin B formulations have been brought forward for clinical testing, many of which were approved and reached market value in the 1990s. This review describes and discusses the molecular genetics, pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical aspects of amphotericin B itself and many of its innovative formulations.     

Antifungal activity of nontraditional antifungal agents

Invasive fungal infections are becoming increasingly important in the management of critically ill and immunocompromised patients. As organ and stem cell transplantation becomes more prominent and immune therapies are employed for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and plaque psoriasis, the population of patients at risk continues to grow. Many invasive fungal infections are associated with extremely high mortality rates. Antifungal options are limited and novel therapies are intriguing as we attempt to improve patient outcomes and preserve the antifungal armamentarium. Many other classes of pharmaceuticals typically seen as non-antifungal do in fact have significant antifungal activity. Prominent among these are calcineurin inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, antibacterials, and others. Some have activity alone and some augment the activity of conventional antifungals. Unfortunately, clinical data are lacking for most of these agents and their role in therapy remains undefined. This review focuses on several representative non-antifungal agents with antifungal activity.     

Antifungal susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and therapy in a murine model of disseminated infection

Background

The incidence of systemic infections by Saccharomyces cerevisiae has increased in recent years, especially among immunocompromised patients. Amphotericin B, voriconazole or echinocandins have been used with favorable outcome against systemic infections by this fungus. However, clinical experience is limited and no in vivo studies have been conducted.

Antifungal Therapy in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

Antifungal therapy during pregnancy and lactation is challenging because of a lack of data on efficacy and safety, coupled with reports of teratogenicity. Although the Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category provides guidance regarding a drug’s potential fetal risks, limitations such as lack of a specific toxic dose or predisposing pregnancy trimester thwart its application. Central to the selection of optimal antifungal therapy are exploration of the literature and assessment of patient-specific factors, including awareness of effects on the pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents that result from physiologic changes during pregnancy. Topical azoles are favored for superficial fungal infections during pregnancy and lactation, whereas amphotericin B is preferred for invasive fungal infections. Data regarding the use of antifungal agents by breastfeeding women are lacking. More studies are needed, particularly with newer antifungals, to better guide clinicians in selecting optimal antifungal therapy that will provide benefit to the mother without harm to the fetus.     

Anidulafungin: a new therapeutic approach in antifungal therapy. Pharmacology of anidulafungin

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent which inhibits beta-1,3-D-glucan synthase and disrupts fungal cell-wall synthesis. It has marked antifungal activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., including amphotericin B and triazole resistant strains. Due to the limited oral availability, anidulafungin in clinical use is available for parenteral administration only. Elimination of anidulafungin takes place via slow non-enzymatic degradation to inactive metabolites. Less than 10% and 1% of the initially administered drug is excreted unchanged into feces and urine, respectively. It does not require dosage adjustment in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment established. Anidulafungin is generally well tolerated. Adverse events appear not to be dose or infusion related. The most common treatment related adverse events are phlebitis, headache, nausea, vomiting and pyrexia. The lack of interactions with tacrolimus, cyclosporine and corticosteroids and its limited toxicity profile places anidulafungin as an attractive new option for the treatment of invasive fungal infections especially in transplant patients.