Advances in proteomic prostate cancer biomarker discovery

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men in the United States. For reasons largely unknown, the incidence of prostate cancer has increased in the last two decades, in spite or perhaps because of a concomitant increase in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. While PSA is acknowledged not to be an ideal biomarker for prostate cancer detection, it is however widely used by physicians due to lack of an alternative. Thus, the identification of a biomarker(s) that can complement or replace PSA represents a major goal for prostate cancer research. Screening complex biological specimens such as blood, urine, and tissue to identify protein biomarkers has become increasingly popular over the last decade thanks to advances in proteomic discovery methods. The completion of human genome sequence together with new development in mass spectrometry instrumentation and bioinformatics has been a major driving force in biomarker discovery research. Here we review the current state of proteomic applications as applied to various sample sources including blood, urine, tissue, and “secretome” for the purpose of prostate cancer biomarker discovery. Additionally, we review recent developments in validation of putative markers, efforts at systems biology approach, and current challenges of proteomics in biomarker discovery.     

The cancer cell secretome: A good source for discovering biomarkers?

Cancer is a leading cause of death. Early detection is usually associated with better clinical outcomes. Recent advances in genomics and proteomics raised hopes that new biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring therapeutic response will soon be discovered. Proteins secreted by cancer cells, referred also as “the cancer cell secretome”, is a promising source for biomarker discovery. In this review we will summarize recent advances in cancer cell secretome analysis, focusing on the five most fatal cancers (lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, and pancreatic). For each cancer type we will describe the proteomic approaches utilized for the identification of novel biomarkers. Despite progress, identification of markers that are superior to those currently used has proven to be a difficult task and very few, if any, newly discovered biomarker has entered the clinic the last 10 years.     

Advanced proteomic technologies for cancer biomarker discovery

Proteomic technologies have experienced major improvements in recent years. Such advances have facilitated the discovery of potential tumor markers with improved sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring of cancer patients. This review will focus on four state-of-the-art proteomic technologies, namely 2D difference gel electrophoresis, MALDI imaging mass spectrometry, electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry and reverse-phase protein array. The major advancements these techniques have brought about and examples of their applications in cancer biomarker discovery will be presented in this review, so that readers can appreciate the immense progress in proteomic technologies from 1997 to 2008. Finally, a summary will be presented that discusses current hurdles faced by proteomic researchers, such as the wide dynamic range of protein abundance, standardization of protocols and validation of cancer biomarkers, and a 5-year view of potential solutions to such problems will be provided.     

Biomarkers for the lung cancer diagnosis and their advances in proteomics

Over a last decade, intense interest has been focused on biomarker discovery and their clinical uses. This interest is accelerated by the completion of human genome project and the progress of techniques in proteomics. Especially, cancer biomarker discovery is eminent in this field due to its anticipated critical role in early diagnosis, therapy guidance, and prognosis monitoring of cancers. Among cancers, lung cancer, one of the top three major cancers, is the one showing the highest mortality because of failure in early diagnosis. Numerous potential DNA biomarkers such as hypermethylations of the promoters and mutations in K-ras, p53, and protein biomarkers; carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA21-1, plasma kallikrein B1 (KLKB1), Neuron-specific enolase, etc. have been discovered as lung cancer biomarkers. Despite extensive studies thus far, few are turned out to be useful in clinic. Even those used in clinic do not show enough sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility for general use. This review describes what the cancer biomarkers are for, various types of lung cancer biomarkers discovered at present and predicted future advance in lung cancer biomarker discovery with proteomics technology.     

Proteomics of human prostate cancer biospecimens: the global,systems-wide perspective for Protein markers with potential clinical utility

Despite intense global efforts, no new clinical and/or viable biomarkers have been established to overcome the limitation of the prostate specific antigen in the early diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The current proteomic approaches to PCa biomarker discovery, each have distinct advantages and disadvantages, yet when combined hold real promise in the coming years. One key approach to this effort is the development of non-targeted, depletion-free and quantitative liquid chromatography–ultra high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS) pipelines for the systems-wide interrogation of the diverse proteomes encompassed in whole tissue and blood serum or plasma. Derived quantitative proteomes can be decoded for their biomedical relevance with advanced bioinformatics and bibliographic mining to yield promising ‘molecular portraits’ that can gauge prostatic disease at the serological level. Their functional annotation, although potentially useful, is beyond our current level of biological understanding and should not be requisite for their effective use in the clinical monitoring of prostatic disease.     

Proteomic profiling of pancreatic cancer for biomarker discovery

Pancreatic cancer is a uniformly lethal disease that is difficult to diagnose at early stage and even more difficult to cure. In recent years, there has been a substantial interest in applying proteomics technologies to identify protein biomarkers for early detection of cancer. Quantitative proteomic profiling of body fluids, tissues, or other biological samples to identify differentially expressed proteins represents a very promising approach for improving the outcome of this disease. Proteins associated with pancreatic cancer identified through proteomic profiling technologies could be useful as biomarkers for the early diagnosis, therapeutic targets, and disease response markers. In this article, we discuss recent progress and challenges for applying quantitative proteomics technologies for biomarker discovery in pancreatic cancer.     

Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer

Despite their potential to impact diagnosis and treatment of cancer, few protein biomarkers are in clinical use. Biomarker discovery is plagued with difficulties ranging from technological (inability to globally interrogate proteomes) to biological (genetic and environmental differences among patients and their tumors). We urgently need paradigms for biomarker discovery. To minimize biological variation and facilitate testing of proteomic approaches, we employed a mouse model of breast cancer. Specifically, we performed LC-MS/MS of tumor and normal mammary tissue from a conditional HER2/Neu-driven mouse model of breast cancer, identifying 6758 peptides representing >700 proteins. We developed a novel statistical approach (SASPECT) for prioritizing proteins differentially represented in LC-MS/MS datasets and identified proteins over- or under-represented in tumors. Using a combination of antibody-based approaches and multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (MRM-MS), we confirmed the overproduction of multiple proteins at the tissue level, identified fibulin-2 as a plasma biomarker, and extensively characterized osteopontin as a plasma biomarker capable of early disease detection in the mouse. Our results show that a staged pipeline employing shotgun-based comparative proteomics for biomarker discovery and multiple reaction monitoring for confirmation of biomarker candidates is capable of finding novel tissue and plasma biomarkers in a mouse model of breast cancer. Furthermore, the approach can be extended to find biomarkers relevant to human disease.     

蛋白质芯片SELDI-TOFMS技术的研究进展及其在临床中的应用

蛋白质芯片为新一代的蛋白质组研究技术,由美国Ciphergen生物系统公司引进,表面增强激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱(SELDI-TOFMS)提供一个高通量和高灵敏度的检测平台。投放至今虽短短10来年,但卓越的成果已广为医学科学界重视,尤其在恶性肿瘤的早期诊断、监控和预后研究上。蛋白质是细胞内执行生物功能的最终分子,蛋白质组学研究让人类更深入了解疾病和生命的本源,不断发现的特异性肿瘤标志物更为攻克癌症带来新希望。这里除对表面增强激光解吸电离_飞行时间质谱作较详尽的介绍外,更重点阐述其近年来蛋白质芯片近期的研究进展和在临床中的应用,并就其优劣和发展前景作出评估。     

A glance at the emerging diagnostic biomarkers in the most prevalent genitourinary cancers

Genitourinary cancers comprise of a heterogenous group of cancers of which renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder carcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma are the most commonly encountered subtypes. A lot of research is ongoing using various strategies for exploration of novel biomarkers for genitourinary cancers. These biomarkers would not reduce the need for invasive diagnostic techniques but also could be used for early and accurate diagnosis to improve the clinical management required for the disease. Moreover, selecting the appropriate treatment regimen for the responsive patients based on these biomarkers would reduce the treatment toxicity as well as cost. Biomarkers identified using various advanced techniques like next generation sequencing and proteomics, which have been classified as immunological biomarkers, tissue-specific biomarkers and liquid biomarkers. Immunological biomarkers include markers of immunological pathways such as CTLA4, PD-1/PDl-1, tissue biomarkers include tissue specific molecules such as PSA antigen and liquid biomarkers include biomarkers detectable in urine, circulating cells etc.The purpose of this review is to provide a brief introduction to the most prevalent genitourinary malignancies, including bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers along with a major focus on the novel diagnostic biomarkers and the importance of targeting them prior to genitourinary cancers treatment. Understanding these biomarkers and their potential in diagnosis of genitourinary cancer would not help in early and accurate diagnosis as mentioned above but may also lead towards a personalized approach for better diagnosis, prognosis and specified treatment approach for an individual.     

Proteomic analysis of colorectal cancer: prefractionation strategies using two-dimensional free-flow electrophoresis

This review deals with the application of a new prefractionation tool, free-flow electrophoresis (FFE), for proteomic analysis of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC is a leading cause of cancer death in the Western world. Early detection is the single most important factor influencing outcome of CRC patients. If identified while the disease is still localized, CRC is treatable. To improve outcomes for CRC patients there is a pressing need to identify biomarkers for early detection (diagnostic markers), prognosis (prognostic indicators), tumour responses (predictive markers) and disease recurrence (monitoring markers). Despite recent advances in the use of genomic analysis for risk assessment, in the area of biomarker identification genomic methods alone have yet to produce reliable candidate markers for CRC. For this reason, attention is being directed towards proteomics as a complementary analytical tool for biomarker identification. Here we describe a proteomics separation tool, which uses a combination of continuous FFE, a liquid-based isoelectric focusing technique, in the first dimension, followed by rapid reversed-phase HPLC (1-6 min/analysis) in the second dimension. We have optimized imaging software to present the FFE/RP-HPLC data in a virtual 2D gel-like format. The advantage of this liquid based fractionation system over traditional gel-based fractionation systems is the ability to fractionate large quantity protein samples. Unlike 2D gels, the method is applicable to both high-M(r) proteins and small peptides, which are difficult to separate, and in the case of peptides, are not retained in standard 2D gels.     

Biomarkers in cancer screening, research and detection: present and future: a review

Biomarkers provide a powerful and dynamic approach to understanding the spectrum of malignancies with applications in observational and analytic epidemiology, randomized clinical trials, screening, diagnosis and prognosis. Defined as alterations in the constituents of tissues or body fluids, these markers offer a means for homogeneous classification of a disease and risk factor, and they can extend one's basic information about the underlying pathogenesis of disease. The goals in cancer research include finding biomarkers that can be used for the early detection of cancers, design individual therapies, and to identify underlying processes involved in the disease. Because so many myriad processes are involved in the diseased states, the goal is similar to 'finding a needle in a haystack'. However, the development of many -omic technologies, such as genomics and proteomics, has allowed us to monitor a large number of key cellular pathways simultaneously. This has enabled the identification of biomarkers and signalling molecules associated with cell growth, cell death and cellular metabolism. These are also facilitating in monitoring the functional disturbance, molecular and cellular damage, and damage response. This brief review describes the development of biomarkers in cancer research and detection with emphasis on different proteomic tools for the identification and discovery of new biomarkers, different clinical assays to detect various biomarkers in different specimens, role of biomarkers in cancer screening and last but not the least, the challenges in this direction of cancer research.     

Biomarkers for prostate cancer

The detection of prostate cancer using a blood test has by many standards changed the face of the disease. Despite this tremendous success, there are limitations attributed to the use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a means to screen and detect prostate cancer. PSA, as its name implies, is not specific for prostate cancer and as such is often found elevated in other prostatic diseases/symptoms associated with the aging male. Clearly, more specific marker(s) that could identify which individuals actually have prostate cancer and differentiate them from those without the disease would be of tremendous value. The search for more accurate and clinically useful biomarkers of prostate cancer has been extensive. This has focused on individual markers, as well as groups of markers. Included among these are PSA isoforms, pathological indicators and stains, nucleic acids and others. This article highlights the discovery of PSA as a first blood‐based biomarker for prostate cancer detection, as well as other molecular biomarkers and their potential application in detection of the disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 3–9, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

循环miRNA 表达谱在肺癌早期诊断、判断预后和指导化疗中的应用

MicroRNA(miRNA)是一种高保守,长度大概21-23个核苷酸,非蛋白编码RNA,起着调节基因表达的作用。近年来有关miRNA与肺癌的关系已经得到证实,并且成为当前研究的热点。miRNA能整体调节基因表达,这使得miRNA表达谱在作为生物信号方面比蛋白编码基因更具有提示作用。最近发现miRNA以被保护的状态存在于循环血液中,这使得miRNA表达的发现具有非侵袭性、重现性以及易检测性。研究显示血浆miRNA表达谱可作为肺癌生物信号分子,在肺癌早期诊断、判断预后和指导化疗药物应用等方面具有重要作用。本文将对血浆miRNA与肺癌的研究进展,以及在肺癌早期诊断、判断预后和指导化疗药物应用等方面作一综述。     

Identification and verification of heat shock protein 60 as a potential serum marker for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health issue worldwide, and novel tumor markers may contribute to its efficient management by helping in early detection, prognosis or surveillance of disease. The aim of our study was to identify new serum biomarkers for CRC, and we followed a phased biomarker discovery and validation process to obtain an accurate preliminary assessment of potential clinical utility. We compared colonic tumors and matched normal tissue from 15 CRC patients, using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), and identified 17 proteins that had significant differential expression. These results were further confirmed by western blotting for heat shock protein (HSP) 60, glutathione-S-transferase Pi, α-enolase, T-complex protein 1 subunit β, and leukocyte elastase inhibitor, and by immunohistochemistry for HSP60. Using mAbs raised against HSP60, we developed a reliable (precision of 5-15%) and sensitive (0.3 ng·mL(-1)) immunoassay for the detection of HSP60 in serum. Elevated levels of HSP60 were found in serum from CRC patients in two independent cohorts; the receiver-operating characteristic curve obtained in 112 patients with CRC and 90 healthy controls had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70, which was identical to the AUC of carcinoembryonic antigen. Combination of serum markers improved clinical performance: the AUC of a three-marker logistic regression model combining HSP60, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 reached 0.77. Serum HSP60 appeared to be more specific for late-stage CRC; therefore, future studies should evaluate its utility for determining prognosis or monitoring therapy rather than early detection.     

Proteomic analysis at the bedside: early detection of cancer

Proteomic technologies promise to accelerate rapidly a new era in molecular medicine, especially in the detection and discovery of disease-related biomarkers. These technologies have no bigger impact than in the field of human cancer research. Beyond lifestyle-associated prevention strategies, early detection of cancer has the most profound impact on the ultimate course of the disease: the earlier the cancer is detected, the better the prognosis. Today, new proteomic technologies are being used to discover new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for the early detection and treatment of cancer that will have important implications at the bedside.     

Biomarkers in cancer screening,research and detection: present and future: a review

Biomarkers provide a powerful and dynamic approach to understanding the spectrum of malignancies with applications in observational and analytic epidemiology, randomized clinical trials, screening, diagnosis and prognosis. Defined as alterations in the constituents of tissues or body fluids, these markers offer a means for homogeneous classification of a disease and risk factor, and they can extend one's basic information about the underlying pathogenesis of disease. The goals in cancer research include finding biomarkers that can be used for the early detection of cancers, design individual therapies, and to identify underlying processes involved in the disease. Because so many myriad processes are involved in the diseased states, the goal is similar to ‘finding a needle in a haystack’. However, the development of many -omic technologies, such as genomics and proteomics, has allowed us to monitor a large number of key cellular pathways simultaneously. This has enabled the identification of biomarkers and signalling molecules associated with cell growth, cell death and cellular metabolism. These are also facilitating in monitoring the functional disturbance, molecular and cellular damage, and damage response. This brief review describes the development of biomarkers in cancer research and detection with emphasis on different proteomic tools for the identification and discovery of new biomarkers, different clinical assays to detect various biomarkers in different specimens, role of biomarkers in cancer screening and last but not the least, the challenges in this direction of cancer research.     

Biomarkers in molecular medicine: cancer detection and diagnosis

In spite of advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the U.S. Successful cancer treatment depends not only on better therapies but also on improved methods to assess an individual's risk of developing cancer and to detect cancers at early stages when they can be more effectively treated. Current cancer diagnostic imaging methods are labor-intensive and expensive, especially for screening large asymptomatic populations. Effective screening strategies depend on methods that are noninvasive and detect cancers in their early stages of development. There is increasing interest and enthusiasm in molecular markers as tools for cancer detection and prognosis. It is hoped that newly discovered cancer biomarkers and advances in high-throughput technologies would revolutionize cancer therapies by improving cancer risk assessment, early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring therapeutic response. These biomarkers will be used either as stand-alone tests or to complement existing imaging methods.     

Identification,prioritization, and evaluation of glycoproteins for aggressive prostate cancer using quantitative glycoproteomics and antibody‐based assays on tissue specimens

Prostate cancer is highly heterogeneous in nature; while the majority of cases are clinically insignificant, some cases are lethal. Currently, there are no reliable screening methods for aggressive prostate cancer. Since most established serum and urine biomarkers are glycoproteins secreted or leaked from the diseased tissue, the current study seeks to identify glycoprotein markers specific to aggressive prostate cancer using tissue specimens. With LC‐MS/MS glycoproteomic analysis, we identified 350 glycopeptides with 17 being altered in aggressive prostate cancer. ELISA assays were developed/purchased to evaluate four candidates, that is, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), periostin, membrane primary amine oxidase (VAP‐1), and cathepsin L, in independent tissue sets. In agreement with the proteomic analysis, we found that COMP and periostin expressions were significantly increased in aggressive prostate tumors while VAP‐1 expression was significantly decreased in aggressive tumor. In addition, the expression of these proteins in prostate metastases also follows the same pattern observed in the proteomic analysis. This study provides a workflow for biomarker discovery, prioritization, and evaluation of aggressive prostate cancer markers using tissue specimens. Our data suggest that increase in COMP and periostin and decrease in VAP‐1 expression in the prostate may be associated with aggressive prostate cancer.     

Mass spectrometry-based expression profiling of clinical prostate cancer

The maturation of MS technologies has provided a rich opportunity to interrogate protein expression patterns in normal and disease states by applying expression protein profiling methods. Major goals of this research strategy include the identification of protein biomarkers that demarcate normal and disease populations, and the identification of therapeutic biomarkers for the treatment of diseases such as cancer (Celis, J. E., and Gromov, P. (2003) Proteomics in translational cancer research: Toward an integrated approach. Cancer Cell 3, 9-151). Prostate cancer is one disease that would greatly benefit from implementing MS-based expression profiling methods because of the need to stratify the disease based on molecular markers. In this review, we will summarize the current MS-based methods to identify and validate biomarkers in human prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose a reverse proteomic approach implementing a quantitative MS research strategy to identify and quantify biomarkers implicated in prostate cancer development. With this approach, the absolute levels of prostate cancer biomarkers will be identified and quantified in normal and diseased samples by measuring the levels of native peptide biomarkers in relation to a chemically identical but isotopically labeled reference peptide. Ultimately, a centralized prostate cancer peptide biomarker expression database could function as a repository for the identification, quantification, and validation of protein biomarker(s) during prostate cancer progression in men.     

Markers of small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death; however, no specific serum biomarker is available till date for detection of early lung cancer. Despite good initial response to chemotherapy, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to identify molecular markers that might influence survival and may serve as potential therapeutic targets. The review aims to summarize the current knowledge of serum biomarkers in SCLC to improve diagnostic efficiency in the detection of tumor progression in lung cancer. The current knowledge on the known serum cytokines and tumor biomarkers of SCLC is emphasized. Recent findings in the search for novel diagnostic and therapeutic molecular markers using the emerging genomic technology for detecting lung cancer are also described. It is believed that implementing these new research techniques will facilitate and improve early detection, prognostication and better treatment of SCLC.