Clonal analysis in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

We have analysed the viability of cellular clones induced by mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrid females during larval growth. These clones contain a portion of either melanogaster or simulans genomes in homozygosity. Analysis has been carried out for the X and the second chromosomes, as well as for the 3L chromosome arm. Clones were not found in certain structures, and in others they appeared in a very low frequency. Only in abdominal tergites was a significant number of clones observed, although their frequency was lower than in melanogaster abdomens. The bigger the portion of the genome that is homozygous, the less viable is the recombinant melano-gaster/simulans hybrid clone. The few clones that appeared may represent cases in which mitotic recombination took place in distal chromosome intervals, so that the clones contained a small portion of either melanogaster or simulans chromosomes in homozygosity. Moreover, Lhr, a gene of D. simulans that suppresses the lethality of male and female melanogaster/simulans hybrids, does not suppress the lethality of the recombinant melanogaster/simulans clones. Thus, it appears that there is not just a single gene, but at least one per tested chromosome arm (and maybe more) that cause hybrid lethality. Therefore, the two species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, have diverged to such a degree that the absence of part of the genome of one species cannot be substituted by the corresponding part of the genome of the other, probably due to the formation of co-adapted gene complexes in both species following their divergent evolution after speciation. The disruption of those coadapted gene complexes would cause the lethality of the recombinant hybrid clones.     

Inviability of hybrids between D. melanogaster and D. simulans results from the absence of simulans X not the presence of simulans Y chromosome

Interspecific crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans or its sibling species result in unisexual inviability of the hybrids. Mostly, crosses of D. melanogaster females X D. simulans males produce hybrid females. On the other hand, only hybrid males are viable in the reciprocal crosses. A classical question is the cause of the unisexual hybrid inviability on the chromosomal level. Is it due to the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome or is it due to the presence of a D. simulans Y chromosome? A lack of adequate chromosomal rearrangements available in D. simulans has made it difficult to answer this question. However, it has been assumed that the lethality results from the absence of the D. simulans X rather than the presence of the D. simulans Y. Recently I synthesized the first D. simulans compound-XY chromosome that consists of almost the entire X and Y chromosomes. Males carrying the compound-XY and no free Y chromosome are fertile. By utilizing the compound-XY chromosome, the viability of hybrids with various constitutions of cytoplasm and sex chromosomes has been examined. The results consistently demonstrate that the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome in hybrid genome, and not the presence of the Y chromosome, is a determinant of the hybrid inviability.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila simulans Lethal hybrid rescue</Emphasis> mutation (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Lhr</Emphasis>) rescues inviable hybrids by restoring X chromosomal dosage compensation and causes fluctuating asymmetry of development

The Drosophila simulans Lhr rescues lethal hybrids from the cross of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. We describe here, the phenotypes of Lhr dependent rescue hybrids and demonstrate the effects of Lhr on functional morphology of the salivary chromosomes in the hybrids. Our results reveal that the phenotypes of the ‘Lhr dependent rescued’ hybrids were largely dependent on the genetic background and the dominance in species and hybrids, and not on Lhr. Cytological examination reveal that while the salivary chromosome of ‘larval lethal’ male carrying melanogaster X chromosome was unusually thin and contracted, in ‘rescued’ hybrid males (C _mel X _mel Y _sim ; A _mel A _sim ) the X chromosome showed typical pale staining, enlarged diameter and incorporated higher rate of ³H-uridine in presence of one dose Lhr in the genome. In hybrid males carrying simulans X chromosome (C _mel X _sim Y _mel ; A _mel A _sim ), enlarged width of the polytene X chromosome was noted in most of the nuclei, in Lhr background, and transcribed at higher rate than that of the single X chromosome of male. In hybrid females (both viable, e.g., C _mel X _mel X _sim ; A _mel A _sim and rescued, e.g., C _mel X _mel X _mel ; A _mel A _sim ), the functional morphology of the X chromosomes were comparable to that of diploid autosomes in presence of one dose of Lhr. In hybrid metafemales, (C _mel X _mel X _mel X _sim ; A _mel A _sim ), two dose of melanogaster X chromosomes and one dose of simulans X chromosome were transcribed almost at ‘female’ rate in hybrid genetic background in presence of one dose of Lhr. In rescued hybrid males, the melanogaster-derived X chromosome appeared to complete its replication faster than autosomes. These results together have been interpreted to have suggested that Lhr suppresses the lethality of hybrids by regulating functional activities of the X chromosome(s) for dosage compensation.     

Structural and genetic studies of the proliferation disrupter genes of Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster

To examine whether structural and functional differences exist in the proliferation disrupter (prod) genes between Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster, we analyzed and compared both genes. The exon–intron structure of the genes was found to be the same – three exons were interrupted by two introns, although a previous report suggested that only one intron existed in D. melanogaster. The prod genes of D. simulans and D. melanogaster both turn out to encode 346 amino acids, not 301 as previously reported for D. melanogaster. The numbers of nucleotide substitutions in the prod genes was 0.0747 ±  per synonymous site and 0.0116 ± 0.0039 per replacement site, both comparable to those previously known for homologous genes between D. simulans and D. melanogaster. Genetic analysis demonstrated that D. simulans PROD can compensate for a deficiency of D. melanogaster PROD in hybrids. The PRODs of D. simulans and D. melanogaster presumably share the same function and a conserved working mechanism. The prod gene showed no significant interaction with the lethality of the male hybrid between these species. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Cytogenetical localization of Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr), a Drosophila melanogaster gene that rescues interspecific hybrids from embryonic lethality

Hybrid females from crosses between Drsophila melanogaster males and females of its sibling species, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, or D. sechellia die as embryos. This lethality is believed to be caused by incompatibility between the X chromosome of D. melanogaster and the maternal cytoplasm. Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) prevents this embryonic lethality and has been cytogenetically mapped to a proximal region of the X chromosome of D. melanogaster, probably in the centromeric heterochromatin. We have carried out high resolution cytological mapping of Zhr using deficiencies and duplications of the X heterochromatin. Deletions of the Zhr ⁺ gene from the hybrid genome exhibit the Zhr phenotype. On the contrary, addition of the wild-type gene to the hybrid genome causes embryonic lethality, regardless of sex. The Zhr locus has been narrowed down to the region covered by Dp(1;f)1162 but not covered Dp(1;f)1205, a chromosome carrying a duplication of heterochromatin located slightly distal to the In(1)sc ⁸ heterochromatic breakpoint.     

Association Between Levels of Coding Sequence Divergence and Gene Misregulation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> Male Hybrids

Previous studies have shown widespread conservation of gene expression levels between species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup as well as a positive correlation between coding sequence divergence and expression level divergence between species. Meanwhile, large-scale misregulation of gene expression level has been described in interspecific sterile hybrids between D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia. Using data from gene expression analysis involving D. simulans, D. melanogaster, and their hybrids, we observed a significant positive correlation between protein sequence divergence and gene expression differences between hybrids and their parental species. Furthermore, we demonstrate that underexpressed misregulated genes in hybrids are evolving more rapidly at the protein sequence level than nonmisregulated genes or overexpressed misregulated genes, highlighting the possible effects of sexual and natural selection as male-biased genes and nonessential genes are the principal gene categories affected by interspecific hybrid misregulation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Carlo G. Artieri and Wilfried Haerty contributed equally to this publication.     

Indirect evidence of alteration in the expression of the rDNA genes in interspecific hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans

Crosses betweenDrosophila melanogaster females andD. simulans males produce viable hybrid females, while males are lethal. These males are rescued if they carry theD. simulans Lhr gene. This paper reports that females of the wild-typeD. melanogaster population Staket do not produce viable hybrid males when crossed withD. simulans Lhr males, a phenomenon which we designate as the Staket phenotype. The agent responsible for this phenomenon was found to be the StaketX chromosome (X ^mel ,Stk). Analysis of the Staket phenotype showed that it is suppressed by extra copies ofD. melanogaster rDNA genes and that theX ^mel ,Stk chromosome manifests a weak bobbed phenotype inD. melanogaster X ^mel ,Stk/0 males. The numbers of functional rDNA genes inX ^mel ,Stk andX ^mel ,y w (control) chromosomes were found not to differ significantly. Thus a reduction in rDNA gene number cannot account for the weak bobbedX ^mel ,Stk phenotype let alone the Staket phenotype. The rRNA precursor molecules transcribed from theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes seem to be correctly processed in both intraspecific (melanogaster) and interspecific (melanogaster-simulans) conditions. It is therefore suggested that theX ^mel ,Stk rDNA genes are inefficiently transcribed in themelanogaster-simulans hybrids.     

The evolutionary genetics of thehobo transposable element in theDrosophila melanogaster complex

Hobo elements are a family of transposable elements found inDrosophila melanogaster and its three sibling species:D. simulans, D. mauritiana andD. sechellia. Studies inD. melanogaster have shown thathobo may be mobilized, and that the genetic effects of such mobilizations included the general features of hybrid dysgenesis: mutations, chromosomal rearrangements and gonadal dysgenis in F1 individuals. At the evolutionary level somehobo-hybridizing sequences have also been found in the other members of themelanogaster subgroup and in many members of the relatedmontium subgroup. Surveys of older collected strains ofD. melanogaster suggest that completehobo elements were absent prior to 50 years ago and that they have recently been introduced into this species by horizontal transfer. In this paper we review our findings and those of others, in order to precisely describe the geographical distribution and the evolutionary history ofhobo in theD. melanogaster complex. Studies of the DNA sequences reveal a different level of divergence between the groupD. melanogaster, D. simulans andD. mauritiana and the fourth speciesD. sechellia. The hypothesis of multiple transfers in the recent past into theD. melanogaster complex from a common outside source is discussed.     

Contrasting patterns of geographic variation in the cosmopolitan sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

An electrophoretic study was carried out to compare the geographic pattern of genetic variation in Drosophila simulans with that of its sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster. An identical set of 32 gene-protein loci was studied in four geographically distant populations of D. simulans and two populations of D. melanogaster, all originating from Europe and Africa. The comparison yielded the following results: (1) tropical populations of D. simulans were, in terms of the number of unique alleles, average heterozygosity per locus, and percentage of loci polymorphic, more variable than conspecific-temperate populations; (2) some loci in both species showed interpopulation differences in allele frequencies that suggest latitudinal clines; and (3) temperate-tropical genetic differentiation between populations was much less in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster. Similar differences between these two species have previously been shown for chromosomal, quantitative, physiological, and middle-repetitive DNA variation. Estimates of N _m (number of migrants per generation) from the spatial distribution of rare alleles suggest that both species have similar levels of interpopulation gene flow. These observations lead us to propose two competing hypotheses: the low level of geographic differentiation in D. simulans is due to its evolutionarily recent worldwide colonization and, alternatively, D. simulans has a narrower niche than D. melanogaster. Geographic variation data on different genetic elements (e.g., mitochondrial DNA, two-dimensional proteins, etc.) are required before these hypotheses can be adequately tested.We thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support (Grant A0235 to R.S.S.).     

Species-Specific Heterochromatin Prevents Mitotic Chromosome Segregation to Cause Hybrid Lethality in Drosophila

Postzygotic reproductive barriers such as sterility and lethality of hybrids are important for establishing and maintaining reproductive isolation between species. Identifying the causal loci and discerning how they interfere with the development of hybrids is essential for understanding how hybrid incompatibilities (HIs) evolve, but little is known about the mechanisms of how HI genes cause hybrid dysfunctions. A previously discovered Drosophila melanogaster locus called Zhr causes lethality in F1 daughters from crosses between Drosophila simulans females and D. melanogaster males. Zhr maps to a heterochromatic region of the D. melanogaster X that contains 359-bp satellite repeats, suggesting either that Zhr is a rare protein-coding gene embedded within heterochromatin, or is a locus consisting of the noncoding repetitive DNA that forms heterochromatin. The latter possibility raises the question of how heterochromatic DNA can induce lethality in hybrids. Here we show that hybrid females die because of widespread mitotic defects induced by lagging chromatin at the time during early embryogenesis when heterochromatin is first established. The lagging chromatin is confined solely to the paternally inherited D. melanogaster X chromatids, and consists predominantly of DNA from the 359-bp satellite block. We further found that a rearranged X chromosome carrying a deletion of the entire 359-bp satellite block segregated normally, while a translocation of the 359-bp satellite block to the Y chromosome resulted in defective Y segregation in males, strongly suggesting that the 359-bp satellite block specifically and directly inhibits chromatid separation. In hybrids produced from wild-type parents, the 359-bp satellite block was highly stretched and abnormally enriched with Topoisomerase II throughout mitosis. The 359-bp satellite block is not present in D. simulans, suggesting that lethality is caused by the absence or divergence of factors in the D. simulans maternal cytoplasm that are required for heterochromatin formation of this species-specific satellite block. These findings demonstrate how divergence of noncoding repetitive sequences between species can directly cause reproductive isolation by altering chromosome segregation.     

The distribution of the transposable elementBari-1 in theDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans genomes

The distribution of the transposable elementBari-1 inD. melanogaster andD. simulans was examined by Southern blot analysis and byin situ hybridization in a large number of strains of different geographical origins and established at different times.Bari-1 copies mostly homogeneous in size and physical map are detected in all strains tested. Both inD. melanogaster and inD. simulans a relatively high level of intraspecific insertion site polymorphism is detectable, suggesting that in both speciesBari-1 is or has been actively transposing. The main difference between the two sibling species is the presence of a large tadem array of the element in a well-defined heterochromatic location of theD. melanogaster genome, whereas such a cluster is absent inD. simulans. The presence ofBari-1 elements with apparently identical physical maps in allD. melanogaster andD. simulans strains examined suggests thatBari-1 is not a recent introduction in the genome of themelanogaster complex. Structural analysis reveals unusual features that distinguish it from other inverted repeat transposons, whereas many aspects are similar to the widely distributedTc1 element ofC. elegans.     

Identification of One Intron Loss and Phylogenetic Evolution of Dfak Gene in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group

Intron loss and its evolutionary significance have been noted in Drosophila. The current study provides another example of intron loss within a single-copy Dfak gene in Drosophila. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we amplified about 1.3 kb fragment spanning intron 5–10, located in the position of Tyr kinase (TyK) domain of Dfak gene from Drosophila melanogaster species group, and observed size difference among the amplified DNA fragments from different species. Further sequencing analysis revealed that D. melanogaster and D. simulans deleted an about 60 bp of DNA fragment relative to other 7 Drosophila species, such as D. elegans, D. ficusphila, D. biarmipes, D. takahashii, D. jambulina, D. prostipennis and D. pseudoobscura, and the deleted fragment located precisely in the position of one intron. The data suggested that intron loss might have occurred in the Dfak gene evolutionary process of D. melanogaster and D. simulans of Drosophila melanogaster species group. In addition, the constructed phylogenetic tree based on the Dfak TyK domains clearly revealed the evolutionary relationships between subgroups of Drosophila melanogaster species group, and the intron loss identified from D. melanogaster and D. simulans provides a unique diagnostic tool for taxonomic classification of the melanogaster subgroup from other group of genus Drosophila.     

Hybrid Lethal Systems in the Drosophila Melanogaster Species Complex. II. the Zygotic Hybrid Rescue (Zhr) Gene of D. Melanogaster

Hybrid females from Drosophila simulans females X Drosophila melanogaster males die as embryos while hybrid males from the reciprocal cross die as larvae. We have recovered a mutation in melanogaster that rescues the former hybrid females. It was located on the X chromosome at a position close to the centromere, and it was a zygotically acting gene, in contrast with mhr (maternal hybrid rescue) in simulans that rescues the same hybrids maternally. We named it Zhr (Zygotic hybrid rescue). The gene also rescues hybrid females from embryonic lethals in crosses of Drosophila mauritiana females X D. melanogaster males and of Drosophila sechellia females X D. melanogaster males. Independence of the hybrid embryonic lethality and the hybrid larval lethality suggested in a companion study was confirmed by employing two rescue genes, Zhr and Hmr (Hybrid male rescue), in doubly lethal hybrids. A model is proposed to explain the genetic mechanisms of hybrid lethalities as well as the evolutionary pathways.     

Aurora, a non-mobile retrotransposon in Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin

A novel retrotransposon, aurora, containing 324 by long terminal repeats (LTRs) was detected in Drosophila melanogaster as a 5 kb insertion in the heterochromatic Stellate gene. This insertion causes a 5 bp duplication of the integration site. Southern analysis and in situ hybridization data show that all detectable copies of aurora are immobilized in the D. melanogaster heterochromatin. However, mobile copies of aurora were revealed in the cuchromatin of D. simulans. The element was also found in various species of the melanogaster subgroup and in the D. virilis genome.The nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper will appear in the EMBL, GenBank and DDBJ Nucleotide Sequence Databases under the accession numbers X70361 and X70362     

Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Melanogaster, D. Simulans and D. Mauritiana: Sex and Species Specific Discrimination

The sexual isolation among the related species Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans and D. mauritiana is asymmetrical. While D. mauritiana males mate well with both D. melanogaster and D. simulans females, females of D. mauritiana discriminate strongly against males of these two species. Similarly, D. simulans males mate with D. melanogaster females but the reciprocal cross is difficult. Interspecific crosses between several populations of the three species were performed to determine if (i) males and females of the same species share a common sexual isolation genetic system, and (ii) males (or females) use the same genetic system to discriminate against females (or males) of the other two species. Results indicate that although differences in male and female isolation depend on the populations tested, the isolation behaviour between a pair of species is highly correlated despite the variations. However, the rank order of the isolation level along the populations was not correlated in both sexes, which suggests that different genes act in male and female sexual isolation. Neither for males nor for females, the isolation behaviour of one species was paralleled in the other two species, which indicates that the genetic systems involved in this trait are species-pair specific. The implications of these results are discussed. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Patterns of puffing activity in the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila

The autosomal salivary gland chromosome puffing patterns of Drosophila simulans are described and compared with the puffing patterns of the sibling species D. melanogaster. During the late third larval instar and the prepupal period the patterns of puffing activity of these two species are similar — approximately 50% of the puffs common to both species showing identical activities. The remaining puffs differ in their timing of activity, or in their mean sizes, or in both of these parameters. A number of puffs (14) found in D. simulans have not been regularly observed in the Oregon stock of D. melanogaster but are active in other D. melanogaster strains. One puff (46 A) of D. melanogaster was absent from D. simulans and forms a heterozygous puff in hybrids, when the homologous chromosomes are synapsed. When the homologues are asynapsed a puff at 46 A is restricted to the melanogaster homologue. The puff at 63E on chromosome arm 3L is considerably smaller in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster and this size difference is autonomous in hybrids. Other puffs not common to both species behave non-autonomously in the species hybrid, even when the homologous chromosomes are asynapsed.     

Developmental stability in hybrids between the sibling species pair,Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species D. simulans were hybridized in the laboratory to test the hypothesis that developmental homeostasis in hybrids between two species having no prior gene flow would be significantly reduced. Developmental stability was assessed by measuring fluctuating asymmetry for three bilateral traits: sternopleural chaetae, wing length, and fronto-orbital plus frontal chaetae. Male F₁ hybrids showed no decrease in developmental stability compared to males of parental species. Female hybrids showed significant fluctuating asymmetry compared to other flies. The results are discussed with respect to ideas about coadaptation and gene flow based upon previous studies of hybrid developmental stability.     

On the causes of sterility in some interspecific hybrids from theMelanogaster subgroup ofDrosophila

Summary The females produced in the crossesD. melanogaster×D. simulans andD. melanogaster×D. mauritiana are sterile and have reduced ovaries.Normal and fertile ovaries were produced when genetically marked pole cells ofD. melanogaster were transplanted into eggs which gave rise to the hybrid females.These results eliminate the possibility that the sterility of these hybrids is due to the somatic component, i.e. the follicular cells of the ovaries, or to other physiological causes. The results also suggest that the control of gonadal morphogenesis is dependent mainly on the germ line.     

In Situ Hybridisation Analysis of the X-Linked Genes in the Species of the Virilis Group of Drosophila

When estimating the level of DNA sequence variation within and between populations or when planning QTL analysis, it is essential to know the location of the genes under study. In the present work, five X chromosomal genes, earlier localised in Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis, were mapped by in situ hybridisation on the larval polytene chromosomes of four other virilis group species, D. a. americana, D. flavomontana, D. lacicola and D. montana. Conjugation of X chromosomes of the most interesting species pairs was studied in interspecific hybrids. Three of the marker genes were used as RFLP markers to examine the occurrence of recombination in D. flavomontana and D. montana hybrid females. The gene arrangement of all species studied, appeared to be different at the proximal end of the X chromosome, which prevented normal conjugation along the most part of the X chromosome. The data illustrating the locations of five X chromosomal marker genes are presented for D. a. americana, D. flavomontana, D. lacicola and D. montana.     

Alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism inDrosophila: Enzyme kinetics of product inhibition

Summary Because natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster are polymorphic for different allozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and becauseD. melanogaster is more tolerant to the toxic effects of ethanol than its sibling speciesD. simulans, information regarding the sensitivities of the different forms of ADH to the products of ethanol degradation are of ecological importance. ADH-F, ADH-S, ADH-71k ofD. melanogaster and the ADH ofD. simulans were inhibited by NADH, but the inhibition was relieved by NAD⁺. The order of sensitivity of NADH was ADH-F<ADH-71k, ADH-S<ADH-simulans with ADH-F being about four times less sensitive than theD. melanogaster enzymes and 12 times less sensitive than theD. simulans enzyme. Acetaldehyde inhibited the ethanolto-acetaldehyde activity of the ADHs, but at low acetaldehyde concentrations ethanol and NAD⁺ reduced the inhibition. ADH-71k and ADH-F were more subject to the inhibitory action of acetaldehyde than ADH-S and ADH-simulans, with ADH-71k being seven times more sensitive than ADH-S. The pattern of product inhibition of ADH-71k suggests a rapid equilibrium random mechanism for ethanol oxidation. Thus, although the ADH variants only differ by a few amino acids, these differences exert a far larger impact on their intrinsic properties than previously thought. How differences in product inhibition may be of significance in the evolution of the ADHs is discussed.