Mechanism of Rep-mediated adeno-associated virus origin nicking

The single-stranded adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) genome is flanked by terminal repeats (TRs) that fold back on themselves to form hairpinned structures. During AAV DNA replication, the TRs are nicked by the virus-encoded Rep proteins at the terminal resolution site (trs). This origin function apparently requires three sequence elements, the Rep binding element (RBE), a small palindrome that comprises a single tip of an internal hairpin within the TR (RBE'), and the trs. Previously, we determined the sequences at the trs required for Rep-mediated cleavage and demonstrated that the trs endonuclease reaction occurs in two discrete steps. In the first step, the Rep DNA helicase activity unwinds the TR, thereby extruding a stem-loop structure at the trs. In the second step, Rep transesterification activity cleaves the trs. Here we investigate the contribution of the RBE and RBE' during this process. Our data indicate that Rep is tethered to the RBE in a specific orientation during trs nicking. This orientation appears to align Rep on the AAV TR, allowing specific nucleotide contacts with the RBE' and directing nicking to the trs. Accordingly, alterations in the polarity or position of the RBE relative to the trs greatly inhibit Rep nicking. Substitutions within the RBE' also reduce Rep specific activity, but to a lesser extent. Interestingly, Rep interactions with the RBE and RBE' during nicking seem to be functionally distinct. Rep contacts with the RBE appear necessary for both the DNA helicase and trs cleavage steps of the endonuclease reaction. On the other hand, RBE' contacts seem to be required primarily for TR unwinding and formation of the trs stem-loop structure, not cleavage. Together, these results suggest a model of Rep interaction with the AAV TR during origin nicking through a tripartite cleavage signal comprised of the RBE, the RBE', and the trs.     

Interaction of the adeno-associated virus Rep protein with a sequence within the A palindrome of the viral terminal repeat.

We have characterized a Rep binding sequence which is within the A stem region of the adeno-associated virus terminal repeat (TR) and compared its affinity with that of the complete hairpinned TR for pure Rep68. Both the A stem and the complete TR substrates produced a complex pattern of protein-DNA complexes in which at least six different bound species could be distinguished. Competition experiments suggested that the dissociation constant for the A stem sequence is approximately 125-fold higher than that for the complete TR. The competition experiments also suggested that the average number of Rep molecules per TR substrate molecule under conditions of saturating substrate is 3.7:1, while for the A stem substrate, the ratio is 10:1. In spite of the apparent difference in protein-to-DNA ratio in the complexes, no major difference was seen in the mobility or the pattern of the protein-DNA complexes with the two kinds of substrates, suggesting that the difference in protein-to-DNA ratio was due to the lower stability of the A stem complex rather than the actual number of Rep molecules per DNA molecule. At least some of the difference in stability of the two kinds of complexes was due to the fact that the dissociation rate of the A stem substrate from the protein-DNA complexes was approximately fourfold faster than that of the complete TR. The dissociation rate curves for both substrates, however, were complex, suggesting that substrate was being released from at least two different kinds of protein-DNA complexes at different rates. In addition, we have analyzed binding to several substitution mutants within the A stem of the TR. A five-base mutant near the terminal resolution site (trs site) had little effect on binding. Two other mutants produced seven- or five-base substitutions within the 25-bp sequence of the A stem that had been identified in the accompanying report (D. M. McCarty, D. J. Pereira, I. Zolotukhin, X. Zhou, J. H. Ryan, and N. Muzyczka, J. Virol. 68:4988-4997, 1994) as essential for binding. Each of these mutants eliminated some but not all of the repeating GAGC motifs in the 25-bp A stem region. Both of these mutants completely abolished binding to the A stem substrate but only partially reduced binding in the context of the complete hairpinned TR. Furthermore, neither mutant altered the pattern of Rep-DNA complexes produced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal half of adeno-associated virus type 2 Rep78 protein

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep78 and Rep68 proteins are required for site-specific integration of the AAV genome into the AAVS1 locus (19q13.3-qter) as well as for viral DNA replication. Rep78 and Rep68 bind to the GAGC motif on the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) and cut at the trs (terminal resolution site). A similar reaction is believed to occur in AAVS1 harboring an analogous GAGC motif and a trs homolog, followed by integration of the AAV genome. To elucidate the functional domains of Rep proteins at the amino acid level, we performed charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis of the N terminus (residues 1 to 240) of Rep78, where DNA binding and nicking domains are thought to exist. Mutants were analyzed for their abilities to bind the GAGC motif, nick at the trs homolog, and integrate an ITR-containing plasmid into AAVS1 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, trs endonuclease assay, and PCR-based integration assay. We identified the residues responsible for DNA binding: R107A, K136A, and R138A mutations completely abolished the binding activity. The H90A or H92A mutant, carrying a mutation in a putative metal binding site, lost nicking activity while retaining binding activity. Mutations affecting DNA binding or trs nicking also impaired the site-specific integration, except for E66A and E239A. These results provide important information on the structure-function relationship of Rep proteins. We also describe an aberrant nicking of Rep78. We found that Rep78 cuts predominantly at the trs homolog not only between the T residues (GGT/TGG), but also between the G and T residues (GG/TTGG), which may be influenced by the sequence surrounding the GAGC motif.     

Rep-Mediated Nicking of the Adeno-Associated Virus Origin Requires Two Biochemical Activities, DNA Helicase Activity and Transesterification

The single-stranded adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome is flanked by terminal hairpinned origins of DNA replication (terminal repeats [TRs]) that are nicked at the terminal resolution site (trs) by the AAV Rep protein in an ATP-dependent, site-specific manner. Here we determine the minimal trs sequence necessary for Rep cleavage, 3'-CCGGT/TG-5', and show that this 7-base core sequence is required only on the nicked strand. We also identify a potential stem-loop structure at the trs. Interestingly, Rep nicking on a TR substrate that fixes this trs stem-loop in the extruded form no longer requires ATP. This suggests that ATP-dependent Rep helicase activity is necessary to unwind the duplex trs and extrude the stem-loop structure, prior to the ATP-independent Rep transesterification reaction. The extrusion of origin stem-loop structures prior to nicking appears to be a general mechanism shared by plant and animal viruses and bacterial plasmids. In the case of AAV, this mechanism of TR nicking would provide a possible regulatory function.     

Identification and characterization of an adeno-associated virus integration site in CV-1 cells from the African green monkey

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a classification given to a group of nonpathogenic, single-stranded DNA viruses known to reside latently in primates. During latency in humans, AAV type 2 (AAV2) preferentially integrates at a site on chromosome 19q13.3ter by targeting a sequence composed of an AAV Rep binding element (RBE), a spacer, and a nicking site. Here, we report the DNA sequence of an African green monkey AAV integration site isolated from CV-1 cells. Overall, it has 98% homology to the analogous human site, including identical spacer and nicking sequences. However, the simian RBE is expanded, having five perfect directly repeated GAGC tetramers. We carried out a number of in vitro and in vivo assays to determine the effect of this expanded RBE sequence on the Rep-RBE interaction and AAV targeted integration. Using electromobility shift assays it was demonstrated that AAV4 Rep68 bound the expanded RBE with a sixfold-greater affinity than the human RBE. To determine the basis for the affinity increase, DNase I protection and methylation interference (MI) assays were performed. Comparison of footprints on both the human and simian RBEs revealed nearly identical protection; however, MI analysis suggested greater interaction with the guanine nucleotides of the expanded RBE, thus providing a biochemical basis for the increased binding activity. In vivo, integration targeted to the simian RBE was demonstrated by PCR analysis of latently infected Cos-7 cells. Interestingly, the frequency of site-specific integration was twofold greater in Cos-7 cells than in HeLa cells. Overall, these experiments establish that the simian RBE, identified in CV-1 cells, functions analogously to the human RBE and provide further evidence for a developing model that proposes individual roles for the RBE and the spacer and nicking site elements.     

Features of the adeno-associated virus origin involved in substrate recognition by the viral Rep protein.

We previously demonstrated that the adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep68 and Rep78 proteins are able to nick the AAV origin of DNA replication at the terminal resolution site (trs) in an ATP-dependent manner. Using four types of modified or mutant substrates, we now have investigated the substrate requirements of Rep68 in the trs endonuclease reaction. In the first kind of substrate, portions of the hairpinned AAV terminal repeat were deleted. Only deletions that retained virtually all of the small internal palindromes of the AAV terminal repeat were active in the endonuclease reaction. This result confirmed previous genetic and biochemical evidence that the secondary structure of the terminal repeat was an important feature for substrate recognition. In the second type of substrate, the trs was moved eight bases further away from the end of the genome. The mutant was nicked at a 50-fold-lower frequency relative to a wild-type origin, and the nick occurred at the correct trs sequence despite its new position. This finding indicated that the endonuclease reaction required a specific sequence at the trs in addition to the correct secondary structure. It also suggested that the minimum trs recognition sequence extended three bases from the cut site in the 3' direction. The third type of substrate harbored mismatched base pairs at the trs. The mismatch substrates contained a wild-type sequence on the strand normally cut but an incorrect sequence on the complementary strand. All of the mismatch mutants were capable of being nicked in the presence of ATP. However, there was substantial variation in the level of activity, suggesting that the sequence on the opposite strand may also be recognized during nicking. Analysis of the mismatch mutants also suggested that a single-stranded trs was a viable substrate for the enzyme. This interpretation was confirmed by analysis of the fourth type of substrate tested, which contained a single-stranded trs. This substrate was also cleaved efficiently by the enzyme provided that the correct strand was present in the substrate. In addition, the single-stranded substrate no longer required ATP as a cofactor for nicking. Finally, all of the substrates with mutant trss bound the Rep protein as efficiently as the wild-type did. This finding indicated that the sequence at the cut site was not involved in recognition of the terminal repeat for specific binding by the enzyme. We concluded that substrate recognition by the AAV Rep protein involves at least two and possibly as many as four features of the AAV terminal repeat.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Selective cleavage of AAVS1 substrates by the adeno-associated virus type 2 rep68 protein is dependent on topological and sequence constraints

The adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV-2) Rep78 and Rep68 proteins are required for replication of the virus as well as its site-specific integration into a unique site, called AAVS1, of human chromosome 19. Rep78 and Rep68 initiate replication by binding to a Rep binding site (RBS) contained in the AAV-2 inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and then specifically nicking at a nearby site called the terminal resolution site (trs). Similarly, Rep78 and Rep68 are postulated to trigger the integration process by binding and nicking RBS and trs homologues present in AAVS1. However, Rep78 and Rep68 cleave in vitro AAVS1 duplex-linear substrates much less efficiently than hairpinned ITRs. In this study, we show that the AAV-2 Rep68 endonuclease activity is affected by the topology of the substrates in that it efficiently cleaves in vitro in a site- and strand-specific manner the AAVS1 trs only if this sequence is in a supercoiled (SC) conformation. DNA sequence mutagenesis in the context of SC templates allowed us to elucidate for the first time the AAVS1 trs sequence and position requirements for Rep68-mediated cleavage. Interestingly, Rep68 did not cleave SC templates containing RBS from other sites of the human genome. These findings have intriguing implications for AAV-2 site-specific integration in vivo.     

Partial purification of adeno-associated virus Rep78, Rep52, and Rep40 and their biochemical characterization.

We have used differential cell extraction and conventional chromatography to separate and partially purify the four adeno-associated virus (AAV) nonstructural proteins Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40. In the cytoplasmic extracts Rep52 and Rep40 were present in greater abundance than Rep68 and Rep78, with Rep78 being the least abundant. In nuclear extracts the four Rep proteins were approximately equal in abundance. Regardless of the subcellular fraction examined, three of the Rep proteins (Rep78, Rep68, and Rep40) consisted of two protein species with slightly different mobilities during polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In contrast, Rep52 consisted of only one protein species. Both Rep78 and Rep68 were capable of binding efficiently to AAV terminal hairpin DNA substrates, but we could not detect site-specific DNA binding by Rep52 and Rep40. Like Rep68, Rep78 had both an ATP-dependent trs endonuclease and a DNA helicase activity. Both Rep78 and Rep68 cut the terminal AAV sequence at the same site (nucleotide 124). The binding, trs endonuclease, and DNA helicase activities comigrated during sucrose density gradient centrifugation with a mobility expected for a monomer of the protein, suggesting that the three biochemical activities were intrinsic properties of the larger Rep proteins. The chromatographic behavior and the DNA-binding properties of the four Rep proteins identified at least two domains within the rep coding region, an exposed hydrophobic domain within the C-terminal end (amino acids 578 to 621) and a region within the N terminus (amino acids 1 to 214) which was necessary for binding to the terminal repeat sequence. No site-specific nuclease activity was seen in the presence of nucleotide analogs ATP-gamma-S or AMP-PNP, suggesting that ATP hydrolysis was required for the endonuclease reaction. Furthermore, although ATP was the only cofactor which would support the trs endonuclease activity of Rep78, Rep68 nuclease activity was seen in the presence of several other nucleotide cofactors, including CTP, GTP, and UTP.     

Interaction of wild-type and mutant adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep proteins on AAV hairpin DNA.

Both the Rep68 and Rep78 proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) bind to AAV terminal repeat hairpin DNA and can mediate site-specific nicking in vitro at the terminal resolution site (trs) within the terminal repeats. To define the regions of the Rep proteins required for these functions, a series of truncated Rep78 derivatives was created. Wild-type and mutant proteins were synthesized by in vitro translation and analyzed for AAV hairpin DNA binding, trs endonuclease activity, and interaction on hairpin DNA. Amino-terminal deletion mutants which lacked the first 29 or 79 amino acid residues of Rep78 did not bind hairpin DNA, which is consistent with our previous identification of a DNA-binding domain in this region. Progressive truncation of the carboxyl-terminal region of Rep78 did not eliminate hairpin DNA binding until the deletion reached amino acid 443. The electrophoretic mobility of the Rep-specific protein-DNA complexes was inversely related to the molecular weight of the Rep derivative. Analysis of the C-terminal deletion mutants by the trs endonuclease assay identified a region (amino acids 467 to 476) that is essential for nicking but is not necessary for DNA binding. When endonuclease-positive, truncated Rep proteins that bound hairpin DNA were mixed with full-length Rep78 or Rep68 protein in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, a smear of protein-DNA complexes was observed. This smear migrated at an intermediate position with respect to the bands generated by the proteins individually. An antibody recognizing only the full-length protein produced a novel supershift band when included in a mixed binding assay containing Rep68 and a truncated Rep mutant. These experiments suggest that the Rep proteins can form hetero-oligomers on the AAV hairpin DNA.     

Roles of adeno-associated virus Rep protein and human chromosome 19 in site-specific recombination

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is the only known eucaryotic virus capable of targeted integration in human cells. AAV integrates preferentially into human chromosome (ch) 19q13.3qter. The nonstructural proteins of AAV-2, Rep78 and Rep68, are essential for targeted integration. Rep78 and Rep68 are multifunctional proteins with diverse biochemical activities, including site-specific binding to AAV and ch-19 target sequences, helicase activity, and strand-specific, site-specific endonuclease activities. Both a Rep DNA binding element (RBE) and a nicking site essential for AAV replication present within the viral terminal repeats are also located on ch-19. Recently, identical RBE sequences have been identified at other locations in the human genome. This fact raises numerous questions concerning AAV targeted integration; specifically, how many RBE sequences are in the human genome? How does Rep discriminate between these and the ch-19 RBE sequence? Does Rep interact with all sites and, if so, how is targeted integration within a fixed time frame facilitated? To better characterize the role of Rep in targeted integration, we established a Rep-dependent filter DNA binding assay using a highly purified Rep-68 fusion protein. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis was also performed to determine the characteristics of the Rep-RBE interaction. Our results determined that the Rep affinity for ch-19 is not distinct compared to other RBEs in the human genome when utilizing naked DNA. In fact, a minimum-binding site (GAGYGAGC) efficiently associated with Rep, suggesting that as many as 2 × 10⁵ sites may exist. In addition, such sites also exist frequently in nonprimate mammalian genomes, although AAV integrates site specifically into primate genomes. EM analysis demonstrated that only one Rep-DNA complex was formed on ch-19 target DNA. Surprisingly, identically sized complexes were observed on all substrates containing a RBE sequence, but never on DNA lacking an RBE. Rep-DNA complexes involved a multimeric protein structure that spanned ca. 60 bp. Immunoprecipitation of AAV latently infected cells determined that 1,000 to 4,000 copies of Rep78 and Rep68 protein are expressed per cell. Comparison of the Rep association constant with those of established DNA binding proteins indicates that sufficient molecules of Rep are present to interact with all potential RBE sites. Moreover, Rep expression in the absence of AAV cis-acting substrate resulted in Rep-dependent amplification and rearrangement of the target sequence in ch-19. This result suggests that this locus is a hot spot for Rep-dependent recombination. Finally, we engineered mice to carry a single 2.7-kb human ch-19 insertion containing the AAV ch-19 target locus. Using cells derived from these mice, we demonstrated that this sequence was sufficient for site-specific recombination after infection with transducing vectors expressing Rep. This result indicates that any host factors required for targeting are conserved between human and mouse. Furthermore, the human ch-19 cis sequences and chromatin structure required for site-specific recombination are contained within this fragment. Overall, these results indicate that the specificity of targeted recombination to human ch-19 is not dictated by differential Rep affinities for RBE sites. Instead, specificity is likely dictated by human ch-19 sequences that serve as a Rep protein-mediated origin of replication, thus facilitating viral targeting through Rep-Rep interactions and host enzymes, resulting in site-specific recombination. Control of specificity is clearly dictated by the ch-19 sequences, since transfer of these sequences into the mouse genome are sufficient to achieve Rep-dependent site-specific integration.Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) contains a single-stranded DNA genome of approximately 4.7 kb (50) and is a member of the Parvoviridae family (3). AAV is unique among other eucaryotic DNA viruses in that it utilizes a biphasic lifecycle to persist in nature. In the presence of a helper virus, adenovirus (Ad) or herpesvirus, AAV will undergo a productive infection. In the absence of a helper virus, AAV will integrate preferentially (>70%) into chromosome (ch) 19q13.3qter (3, 35). The ability of this nonpathogenic DNA virus, or virus-derived vector systems, to integrate site specifically have made it an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy (45).The AAV genome consists of two open reading frames (ORFs), which comprise the rep and cap genes, and 145-bp inverted terminal repeats (ITRs), which serve as the origins of replication (3, 35). The left ORF of AAV encodes four nonstructural proteins, Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40. Extensive characterization of Rep78 and Rep68 in vitro has identified the following biochemical activities, DNA binding (18, 19), site-specific and strand-specific endonuclease activities (17, 19), and DNA-RNA and DNA-DNA helicase activities (17, 19, 59), all of which appear to be necessary for viral replication (15, 53). More importantly, Rep78 and Rep68 are required for mediating targeted integration (2, 43, 47, 51, 60).Though site-specific integration is dependent upon either of the two large Rep proteins, the AAV ITRs are the only cis elements required for integration (34, 44, 61). In the absence of Rep proteins, the virus will still integrate through the ITR sequence but randomly into the host genome (21, 56, 61). Although integration in the absence of the Rep proteins is random, virus-cell junctions are nearly identical to junctions formed during targeted integration (DNA microhomology at junctions, specific deletions of the ITR sequences, rearrangement of the chromosome locus, and head-to-tail virus concatemers) (41, 62). In fact, in vitro integration products generated using cellular extracts produced identical type junctions, demonstrating the essential role the ITRs play in viral integration (62). From this analysis, Yang et al. (62) concluded that both random and targeted integration are dependent upon a cellular recombination pathway, with the role of Rep facilitating integration at ch-19. To help account for AAV targeting, a nearly identical Rep binding element (RBE) and a nicking site (trs) to that present on the AAV ITR was identified on the ch19.13.3qter AAV integration sequence (23–25, 43, 46, 54, 57). It was also demonstrated that Rep68 could mediate complex formation between the AAV ITR and the ch-19 integration site in vitro (57). This led to a hypothesis that AAV may target integration by Rep-mediated complex formation between the AAV ITR and the ch19 integration site. However, since this observation subsequent data has demonstrated that Rep can bind to degenerate RBE sequences, (5, 32). In fact, computer analysis identified at least 15 genomic genes which contained RBE sites that bound to AAV Rep protein in vitro, all more efficient than the ch-19 sequence (58). These data raise the question as to how Rep can target ch-19 among other RBE sequences. Using an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-based shuttle vector system carrying sequences from ch-19, Linden et al. demonstrated that the trs site was also critical for AAV site-specific integration (29, 30). When the trs site was not present, targeting was lost, even though the RBE was present. The present study suggested that both sequences were essential for site-specific integration (the RBE and the trs sequences). The probability of identifying a RBE with the correct proximity of a trs site would suggest a frequency of <6 × 10⁻¹¹/genome, thereby defining a unique sequence in the human genome (54). While these studies identify ch-19 cis elements required for AAV targeted integration and suggest why this reaction is specific, how Rep carries out this reaction remains unclear.Critical to any model of AAV Rep-mediated targeted integration is the ability to recognize the ch-19 target sequence among other potential RBE sequences. Though Rep can bind many degenerate sequences, the actual definition of what constitutes an RBE is somewhat unclear. Random oligonucleotide selection demonstrated that the RBE could be defined as an 8-bp sequence: 5′-GAGYGAGC-3′ (5). However, it was shown by methylation interference assays that the RBE was an 18-bp core sequence and that any mutation within this sequence would significantly affect Rep binding (42). Also, the report by Wonderling and Owens (58) demonstrated that the RBE oligonucleotides derived from the BLAST search contained mutations in this 18-bp core sequence but still bound better to the MBP-Rep68 than to the ch-19 RBE. Depending on the definition of an AAV RBE, the copy number present in the human genome (GAGYGAGC = 200,000 copies/genome, whereas 18-bp core = 1 copy/genome) could significantly impact the ability of Rep to identify its target locus.Based on the above information, the number of RBE sequences in the human genome, how Rep discriminates between these and the ch-19 target locus RBE sequence, and how Rep interacts with all sites and still facilitates targeted integration within a fixed time frame become of significant importance. In this study, we evaluated the role of alternative RBEs in the human genome and how these sequences might impact the ability of Rep to target the locus on ch-19. Using a filter-binding assay and a highly purified source of Rep68 protein, we established that genomic DNA will compete efficiently against a ch-19 target sequences. In this assay, a minimum Rep binding site of 8-bp in the context of large DNA fragments demonstrated competition, suggesting that as many as 200,000 potential binding sites may exist in the human genome. Filter-binding analysis of genomic DNA successfully retained ch-19 target sequences, as well as a cellular RBE identified by BLAST analysis, corroborating the competition results. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis was utilized to distinguish possible differences between Rep protein DNA interaction with ch-19 RBE compared to a minimum 8-bp RBE sequence. Identical multimeric Rep protein DNA complexes, which spanned about 60 bp, assembled on ch-19 target DNA, as well as a minimum RBE site, but never on heterologous DNA lacking these sequences. At a high Rep concentration, protein DNA looping structures were detected, but no evidence for paranemic structures were observed. In vivo analysis of Rep protein levels in a latent infection demonstrated approximately 1 to 4,000 copies/cell. Analysis of Rep expression in non-virus-infected cells demonstrated DNA rearrangement of the ch-19 target sequence, suggesting that this locus is a hot spot for Rep-induced DNA amplification and rearrangement that most likely influences AAV targeted integration. Finally, generation of an animal model carrying the human ch-19 sequence at the mouse hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) locus facilitated AAV Rep-mediated targeted integration and corroborates the importance of the ch-19 RBE-trs sequence.     

Adeno-associated virus DNA replication in vitro: activation by a maltose binding protein/Rep 68 fusion protein.

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) nonstructural protein Rep 68 is required for viral DNA replication. An in vitro assay has been developed in which addition of Rep 68 to an extract from uninfected HeLa cells supports AAV DNA replication. In this paper, we report characterization of the replication process when a fusion of the maltose binding protein and Rep 68, expressed in Escherichia coli, was used in the assay. Replication was observed when the template was either linear double-stranded AAV DNA or a plasmid construct containing intact AAV DNA. When the recombinant plasmid construct was used as the template, there was replication of pBR322 DNA as well as the AAV DNA; however, linear pBR322 DNA was not replicated. When the plasmid construct was the template, replication appeared to initiate on the intact plasmid and led to separation of the AAV sequences from those of the vector, a process which has been termed rescue. There was no evidence that replication could initiate on the products of rescue. Rep 68 can make a site-specific nick 124 nucleotides from the 3' end of AAV DNA; the site of the nick has been called the terminal resolution site. Our data are most consistent with initiation occurring at the terminal resolution site and proceeding toward the 3' terminus. When the template was the plasmid construct, either elongation continued past the junction into pBR322 sequences or the newly synthesized sequence hairpinned, switched template strands, and replicated the AAV DNA. Replication was linear for 4 h, during which time 70% of the maximal synthesis took place. An additional finding was that the Rep fusion could resolve AAV dimer length duplex intermediates into monomer duplexes without DNA synthesis.     

A Rep recognition sequence is necessary but not sufficient for nicking of DNA by adeno-associated virus type-2 Rep proteins

The strand-specific, site-specific endonuclease (nicking) activity of the Rep68 and Rep78 (Rep68/78) proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is involved in AAV replication, and appears to be involved in AAV site-specific integration. Rep68/78 cuts within the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of the AAV genome and in the AAV preferred integration locus on human chromosome 19 (AAVS1). The known endonuclease cut sites are 11-16 bases away from the primary binding sites, known as Rep recognition sequences (RRSs). A linear, double-stranded segment of DNA, containing an RRS and a cut site, has previously been shown to function as a substrate for the Rep68/78 endonuclease activity. We show here that mutation of the Rep recognition sequence, within such a DNA segment derived from the AAV ITRs, eliminates the ability of this substrate to be cleaved detectably by Rep78. Rep78 nicks the RRS-containing site from AAVS1 about half as well as the linear ITR sequence. Eighteen other RRS-containing sequences found in the human genome, but outside AAVS1, are not cleaved by Rep78. These results may help to explain the specificity of AAV integration.     

Mutational analysis of adeno-associated virus type 2 Rep68 protein endonuclease activity on partially single-stranded substrates

The endonuclease activity of the Rep68 and Rep78 proteins (Rep68/78) of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) cuts at the terminal resolution site (trs) within the hairpin structure formed by the AAV inverted terminal repeats. Recent studies suggest that a DNA unwinding function of Rep68/78 may be required for endonuclease activity. We demonstrate that several mutant proteins which are endonuclease negative on a fully duplex hairpin substrate are endonuclease positive on a partially single-stranded hairpin substrate. Truncation analysis revealed that the endonuclease function is contained within the first 200 amino acids of Rep68/78. This endonucleolytic cleavage is believed to involve the covalent attachment of Rep68/78 to the trs via a phosphate-tyrosine linkage. A previous report (S. L. Walker, R. S. Wonderling, and R. A. Owens, J. Virol. 71:2722-2730, 1997) suggested that tyrosine 152 was part of the active site. We individually mutated each tyrosine within the first 200 amino acids of the Rep68 moiety of a maltose binding protein-Rep68/78 fusion protein to phenylalanine. Only mutation of tyrosine 156 resulted in a protein incapable of covalent attachment to a partially single-stranded hairpin substrate, suggesting that tyrosine 156 is part of the endonuclease active site.     

An adeno-associated virus (AAV) initiator protein, Rep78, catalyzes the cleavage and ligation of single-stranded AAV ori DNA

The Rep78 protein of adeno-associated virus (AAV) contains amino acid sequence motifs common to rolling-circle replication (RCR) initiator proteins. In this report, we describe RCR initiator-like activities of Rep78. We demonstrate that a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-Rep78 fusion protein can catalyze the cleavage and ligation of single-stranded DNA substrates derived from the AAV origin of replication. Rep-mediated single-stranded DNA cleavage was strictly dependent on the presence of certain divalent cations (e.g., Mn(2+) or Mg(2+)) but did not require the presence of a nucleoside triphosphate cofactor. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that binding of single-stranded DNA by MBP-Rep78 was influenced by the length of the substrate as well as the presence of potential single-stranded cis-acting sequence elements. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to examine the role of specific tyrosine residues within a conserved RCR motif (motif 3) of Rep78. Replacement of Tyr-156 with phenylalanine abolished the ability of MBP-Rep78 to mediate the cleavage and ligation of single-stranded DNA substrates but not the ability to stably bind single-stranded DNA. The cleaving-joining activity of Rep78 is consistent with the mechanism of replicative intermediate dimer resolution proposed for the autonomous parvoviruses and may have implications for targeted integration of recombinant AAV vectors.     

Comparative characterization of rep proteins from the helper-dependent adeno-associated virus type 2 and the autonomous goose parvovirus

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are nonautonomous human parvoviruses in that they are dependent on helper functions supplied by other viruses or on genotoxic stimuli for conditions permissive for replication. In the absence of helper, AAV type 2 enters latency by integration into a specific site on human chromosome 19. This feature of AAV, in combination with a lack of pathogenicity, makes AAV an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy. Goose parvovirus (GPV) is both autonomous and pathogenic yet is highly homologous to AAV. To address the molecular bases for the different viral lifestyles, we compare the AAV and GPV nonstructural proteins, Rep78 and Rep1, respectively. We find that Rep78 and Rep1 possess several biochemical activities in common, including (i) high-affinity DNA binding for sequences that constitute the minimal DNA replication origin; (ii) nucleoside triphosphate-dependent DNA helicase activity; and (iii) origin-specific replication of double-stranded linear DNA. These experiments also establish a specific 38-bp DNA sequence as the minimal GPV DNA replication origin. It is noteworthy that although the proposed Rep binding sites of GPV and AAV are highly similar, Rep1 and Rep78 show a high degree of specificity for their respective origins, in both binding and replication assays. One significant difference was observed; with the minimal replication origin in adenovirus-uninfected extracts, Rep78-mediated replication exhibited low processivity, as previously reported. In contrast, Rep1 efficiently replicated full-length template. Overall, our studies indicate that GPV Rep1 and AAV Rep78 support a comparable mode of replication. Thus, a comparison of the two proteins provides a model system with which to determine the contribution of Rep in the regulation of dependence and autonomy at the level of DNA replication.