Progesterone receptor-B regulation of insulin-like growth factor-stimulated cell migration in breast cancer cells via insulin receptor substrate-2

Progesterone action contributes to the signaling of many growth factor pathways relevant to breast cancer tumor biology, including the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system. Previous work has shown that insulin receptor substrate-2 (IRS-2) but not IRS-1 levels were regulated by progestin in progesterone receptor-B (PR-B) isoform expressing MCF-7 cells (C4-12 PR-B). Furthermore, type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R) signaling via IRS-2 correlated with the increased cell migration observed in a number of breast cancer cell lines. Consequently, in this study, we examined whether the elevation of IRS-2 protein induced by progestin was sufficient to promote IGF-I-stimulated cell motility. Treatment of C4-12 PR-B cells with progestin shifted the balance of phosphorylation from IRS-1 to IRS-2 in response to IGF-I. This shift in IRS-2 activation was associated with enhanced migration in C4-12 PR-B cells pretreated with progestin, but had no effect on cell proliferation or survival. Treatment of C4-12 PR-B cells with RU486, an antiprogestin, inhibited IGF-induced cell migration. Attenuation of IRS-2 expression using small interfering RNA resulted in decreased IGF-stimulated motility. In addition, IRS-2 knockdown resulted in an abrogation of PKB/Akt phosphorylation but not mitogen-activated protein kinase. Consequently, LY294002, a phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor, abolished IGF-induced cell motility in progestin-treated C4-12 PR-B cells. These data show a role for the PR in functionally promoting growth factor signaling, showing that levels of IRS proteins can determine IGF-mediated biology, PR-B signaling regulates IRS-2 expression, and that IRS-2 can mediate IGF-induced cell migration via phosphoinositide-3-kinase in breast cancer cells.     

Regulation of growth hormone and epidermal growth factor receptors by progestins in breast cancer cells

A 24 hr incubation of T-47D human breast cancer cells with R5020, a synthetic progestin, resulted in a 200-250% increase in the specific binding of human growth hormone (hGH) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) by these cells. This effect was specific for progestins in that similar responses were observed with progesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate and ORG 2058 but no significant increases in hGH or EGF binding were observed in cells incubated with testosterone, estradiol or hydrocortisone. Increased binding was due to an increase in the concentration of receptors (hGH, control = 6,490 +/- 500, progestin treated = 13,180 +/- 3,270 sites/cell; EGF, control = 33,380 +/- 7,410, progestin treated = 67,460 +/- 20,330 sites/cell) while the affinity constants for the hormone-receptor interactions were unchanged by progestin treatment. The specific binding of insulin, calcitonin, transferrin and concanavalin A was unaffected by these treatments. It is concluded that expression of hGH and EGF receptors in this breast cancer cell line is regulated by progestins.     

Differential hormone-dependent phosphorylation of progesterone receptor A and B forms revealed by a phosphoserine site-specific monoclonal antibody

Human progesterone receptor (PR) is phosphorylated on multiple serine residues (at least seven sites) in a manner that involves distinct groups of sites coordinately regulated by hormone and different kinases. Progress on defining a functional role for PR phosphorylation has been hampered both by the complexity of phosphorylation and the lack of simple, nonradioactive methods to detect the influence of ligands and other signaling pathways on specific PR phosphorylation sites in vivo. Toward this end, we have produced monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that recognize specific phosphorylation sites within human PR including a basal site at Ser 190 (MAb P190) and a hormone-induced site at Ser 294 (MAb P294). Biochemical experiments showed the differential reactivity of the P190 and P294 MAbs for phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of PR. Both MAbs recognize specific phosphorylated forms of PR under different experimental conditions including denatured PR protein by Western blots and PR in its native conformation in solution or complexed to specific target DNA. As detected by Western blot of T47D cells treated with hormone for different times, hormone-dependent down-regulation of total PR and the Ser 190 phosphorylation site occurred in parallel, whereas the Ser 294 phosphorylation site was down-regulated more rapidly. This difference in kinetics suggests that the Ser 294 site is more labile than basal sites and is acted upon by distinct phosphatases. A strong preferential hormone-dependent phosphorylation of Ser 294 was observed on PR-B as compared with the amino-terminal truncated A form of PR. This was unexpected because Ser 294 and flanking sequences are identical on both proteins, suggesting that a distinct conformation of the N-terminal domain of PR-A inhibits phosphorylation of this site. That Ser 294 lies within an inhibitory domain that mediates the unique repressive functions of PR-A raises the possibility that differential phosphorylation of Ser 294 is involved in the distinct functional properties of PR-A and PR-B.     

Effects of the steroid antagonist RU486 on dimerization of the human progesterone receptor.

We previously reported, using a coimmunoprecipitation assay, that the B form (PR-B) of the human progesterone receptor from T47D human breast cancer cells dimerizes in solution with the A receptor (PR-A) and that the extent of dimerization correlates with receptor binding activity for specific DNA sequences [DeMarzo, A.M., Beck, C.A., O?ate, S.A., & Edwards, D.P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 72-76]. This suggested that solution dimerization is an intermediate step in the receptor activation process. The present study has tested the effects of the progesterone antagonist RU486 on solution dimerization of progesterone receptors (PR). As determined by the coimmunoprecipitation assay, RU486 binding did not impair dimerization of receptors; rather, the antagonist promoted more efficient solution dimerization than the progestin agonist R5020. This enhanced receptor dimerization correlated with a higher DNA binding activity for transformed receptors bound with RU486. RU486 has been shown previously to produce two other alterations in the human PR when compared with R5020. PR-RU486 complexes in solution exhibit a faster sedimentation rate (6 S) on salt-containing sucrose density gradients than PR-R5020 complexes (4 S), and PR-DNA complexes have a faster electrophoretic mobility on gel-shift assays in the presence of RU486. We presently show that the 6 S PR-RU486 complex is a receptor monomer, not a dimer. The increased sedimentation rate and increased mobility on gel-shift assays promoted by RU486 were also observed with recombinant PR-A and PR-B separately expressed in insect cells from baculovirus vectors. These results suggest that RU486 induces a distinct conformational change both in PR monomers in solution and in dimers bound to DNA. We also examined whether conformational changes in PR induced by RU486 would prevent a PR polypeptide bound to RU486 from heterodimerization with another PR polypeptide bound to R5020. To evaluate this, PR-A and PR-B that were separately bound to R5020 or RU486 in whole cells were mixed in vitro. PR-A-RU486 was capable of dimerization with PR-B-R5020, and this was demonstrated for heterodimers both formed in solution and bound to specific DNA. The capability to form heterodimers in vitro raises the possibility that the antagonist action of RU486 in vivo could in part be imposed in a dominant negative fashion through heterodimerization between one receptor subunit bound to an agonist and another bound to RU486.     

Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells

T47D cells, cultured in medium containing serum stripped of endogenous steroids, proliferate in response to treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist, R5020 or the PR agonist/antagonist, RU486, whereas the full PR antagonist, ZK98299 has no proliferative effects. Under estrogenized conditions, all of the PR ligands tested inhibit cell growth [23]. In order to determine whether the levels or phosphorylation state of PR are reflected in the growth patterns of T47D cells, we monitored the effects of these PR ligands on the immunoblotted PR band intensities, the relative intensities, of PR-A and PR-B, and their phosphorylation states that are reflected in their altered mobility during SDS-PAGE. Under conditions where the PR ligands inhibit cell proliferation, each ligand had distinctively different qualitative and quantitative effects on PR. Short term treatment of the cells with R5020 or RU486 induced a characteristic phosphorylation-dependent upshift of both PR-A and PR-B. The phosphorylated PR was stable for up to 4 days after treatment of the cells with RU486, but was down regulated between 6-24 h after treatment with R5020. No replenishment of PR in cells treated with R5020 was detected. ZK98299, at concentrations tested, had no qualitative or quantitative effects on PR. Culturing cells for 8 days in medium containing steroid-depleted serum caused a significant reduction in the PR band intensity without causing a change in the ratio of PR-A and PR-B or their phosphorylation states. This decrease in the PR band intensity was reversed by maintaining the cells in 1 nM estrogen, but was potentiated by RU486 or ZK98299. These observations support the view that decreased PR levels may play a role in the stimulatory effects of R5020 and RU486 when cells are cultured under non-estrogenized conditions.