Regulation of the Escherichia coli rrnB P2 promoter

The seven rRNA operons in Escherichia coli each contain two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Most previous studies have focused on the rrn P1 promoters. Here we report a systematic analysis of the activity and regulation of the rrnB P2 promoter in order to define the intrinsic properties of rrn P2 promoters and to understand better their contributions to rRNA synthesis when they are in their natural setting downstream of rrn P1 promoters. In contrast to the conclusions reached in some previous studies, we find that rrnB P2 is regulated: it displays clear responses to amino acid availability (stringent control), rRNA gene dose (feedback control), and changes in growth rate (growth rate-dependent control). Stringent control of rrnB P2 requires the alarmone ppGpp, but growth rate-dependent control of rrnB P2 does not require ppGpp. The rrnB P2 core promoter sequence (-37 to +7) is sufficient to serve as the target for growth rate-dependent regulation.     

Structure of the promoter region for the rrnB gene in Escherichia coli.

The nucleotide sequence of the promoter region for the rrnB gene of E. coli had been determined by the Maxam-Gilbert technique. The 700 bp long sequence had been compared with the published sequences of four other rRNA promoter regions. The rrnB sequence was found to be homologous with the rrnA promoter sequence till the 370th base upstream from the coding region of mature 16S rRNA. The significance of this homology is discussed and a tentative model is proposed to account for the unusual properties of the rRNA promoters.     

The signal for growth rate control and stringent sensitivity in E. coli is not restricted to a particular sequence motif within the promoter region.

Hybrid promoter constructs were used to determine the DNA sequence requirements for stringent and growth rate control within a promoter region. The promoters were obtained by fusing complementing sequence regions located upstream and downstream from the GCGC discriminator motif of the growth rate regulated rRNA P1 promoter and a non-regulated tac promoter variant. The activities and the regulatory response of the hybrid promoters were determined in vivo using a promoter test vector system with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. Measurements were made at different growth rates and after starvation for isoleucine to induce the stringent response. Neither the upstream nor the downstream sequence of P1 relative to the GCGC discriminator motif conferred comparable regulatory features when fused to the complementing sequences of the non-regulated mutant tac promoter. A minor response to amino acid deprivation or changes in the growth rate was noted for the hybrid promoter with the rrnB P1 upstream segment and the tac downstream element, pointing to a slightly different importance of the two sequence elements for regulation. The parallel effects for stringent as well as growth rate regulation of the hybrid promoters supports the view of a common mechanism for both types of control. However, none of the promoter sequence elements on its own was able to restore the complete regulatory behaviour of their 'parent' promoters.     

Bacillus subtilis rRNA promoters are growth rate regulated in Escherichia coli.

rRNA promoters from the rrnB locus of Bacillus subtilis and from the rrnB locus of Escherichia coli were fused to the gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). The level of expression of CAT in E. coli showed growth rate dependence when the CAT gene was linked to either E. coli or B. subtilis tandem promoters. The downstream promoter of the tandem Bacillus pair showed growth rate regulation, while the upstream promoter did not, whereas for the E. coli tandem promoters, only the upstream promoter was growth rate regulated.     

The structural basis of the high in vivo strength of the rRNA P2 promoter of Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA promoters of Escherichia coli are probably the strongest promoters in vivo and they can be used on plasmid vectors to express protein-coding sequences at a high rate. In fact, the P2 promoter of the rrnB gene is stronger (in vivo) than the tac promoter, which has a perfect consensus sequence. Conversion of the rrnB P2 promoter sequence to consensus significantly increases in vivo promoter strength. The removal of four nucleotides downstream of the -10 region also increases the strength of this promoter. On the other hand, shifting of the A + T-rich region upstream of this promoter by an 11-bp insertion drastically decreases in vivo activity. It is concluded that the two functionally important hexanucleotide sequences, -35 and -10, are necessary but not sufficient factors for the optimalization of in vivo promoter strength.     

New approaches to increase the expression and stability of cloned foreign genes in Escherichia coli.

A family of expression plasmid vectors were constructed by fusing the strong P2 promoter of the rrnB gene of Escherichia coli (coding for ribosomal RNA) to the lac operator, thereby eliminating regulatory sequences from the rrnB gene and placing the expression under lac repressor control. This promoter proved to be stronger in vivo than the well-known consensus tac promoter, and its strength could be further increased by converting the sequence to consensus. The stability of the recombinant proteins could be increased by fusion to various lengths of the N-terminal end of beta-galactosidase, or by inserting a synthetic oligonucleotide, coding for heptathreonine. A new method was developed for the stabilization of recombinant plasmids without antibiotic selection, based on the presence of an essential gene on the plasmid and its absence from the chromosome. The application of this method is illustrated by the example of a plasmid expressing human proinsulin.     

Two functions encoded by adenovirus early region 1A are responsible for the activation and repression of the DNA-binding protein gene.

Human adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) gene products differentially regulate the expression of early region 2A (E2A) encoding the DNA-binding protein (DBP). In a microinjection system, plasmids containing the DBP gene associated with both its early (map coordinate 75) and late (coordinate 72) promoters, or only with the early promoter, are inefficiently expressed, and the presence of E1A DNA is required for full expression. In contrast, the E2A plasmid in which the DBP gene is associated solely with its late promoter, efficiently produces DBP, the synthesis of which is significantly inhibited by an E1A gene product. To identify which of the E1A products is responsible for either activation or repression of DBP gene expression, two E1A mutants (Ad5hr1 and Ad2/5pm975) have been tested in the microinjection system in the presence of different DBP plasmids containing either one or both promoters. The results obtained indicate that the product encoded by the E1A 13S mRNA is responsible for the stimulation of DBP produced from the early promoter and that the 12S mRNA codes for the product which represses the synthesis of DBP from the late promoter. These results were confirmed using clones in which the E2A early or late promoter was associated to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene and assayed for CAT activity after cell transfection in the absence or in the presence of wild-type or mutant E1A plasmids, and we have also shown that this promoter-dependent regulation is reflected in the relative amount of specific DBP mRNA.