Cellular pharmacology of polynuclear platinum anti-cancer agents

Study of the cellular pharmacology of the dinuclear platinum complexes, BBR3005 ([?trans-PtCl(NH3)2?2H2N(CH2)6NH2]2+), BBR3171 ([?cis-PtCl(NH3)2?2H2N(CH2)6NH2]2+) and the trinuclear platinum complex, BBR3464 ([?trans-PtCl(NH3)2?2 mu-?trans-Pt(NH3)2(H2N(CH2)6NH2)2?]4+) was undertaken in wild type and cisplatin-resistant L1210 murine leukemia cell lines. All complexes are potent cytotoxic agents against the wild type cell line. Only BBR3464 shows enhanced activity against the cisplatin-resistant cell line following a brief exposure. This enhanced activity is attributable, in part, to preserved accumulation, which contrasts with diminished accumulation of cisplatin and both dinuclear platinum complexes. The cisplatin-resistant cell line is relatively tolerant of DNA adducts induced by both cisplatin and BBR3464, but BBR3464 is much less affected. All complexes induce DNA interstrand cross-links. Di/trinuclear complex-induced interstrand cross-linking peaks early, suggesting rapid genomic access and interaction. Subsequent decay suggests susceptibility to DNA repair mechanisms. Peak and area-under-the-curve values for interstrand cross-linking among the complexes correlate poorly with cytotoxic effects, especially in the cisplatin-resistant cell line. This suggests that all interstrand cross-linking adducts are not equal in their cytotoxic effect, or other, non-interstrand cross-linking adducts are significant. BBR3464 has been selected for clinical development largely on the basis of results from in vivo activity and toxicity studies. These results show BBR3464 to have unique properties in the context of acquired cisplatin-resistance that enhance its candidacy as a potential anticancer agent.     

Effect of the geometry of the central coordination sphere in antitumor trinuclear platinum complexes on DNA binding

Polynuclear platinum compounds comprise a unique class of anticancer agents with chemical and biological properties different from mononuclear platinum drugs. The lead compound of this class is bifunctional trinuclear platinum complex [[trans-PtCl(NH(3))(2)](2)mu-trans-Pt(NH(3))(2)[H(2)N(CH(2))(6)NH(2)](2)](4+) (1,0,1/t,t,t, BBR 3464). Interestingly, the geometry of the coordination spheres in this compound affects potency. For example, the central cis unit of [[trans-PtCl(NH(3))(2)](2)mu-cis-Pt(NH(3))(2)[H(2)N(CH(2))(6)NH(2)](2)](4+) (1,0,1/t,c,t, BBR 3499) results in substantially reduced cytotoxicity. It has been shown that the interactions of polynuclear platinum drugs with target DNA are distinct from the mononuclear-based cisplatin family. In the present work the DNA binding of 1,0,1/t,c,t in cell-free media was examined by the methods of molecular biophysics and compared to the binding of 1,0,1/t,t,t. The binding of 1,0,1/t,c,t is slower and less sequence specific. 1,0,1/t,c,t also forms on DNA long-range delocalized intrastrand and interstrand cross-links similarly as 1,0,1/t,t,t, although the frequency of interstrand adducts is markedly enhanced. Importantly, the adducts of 1,0,1/t,c,t distort DNA conformation and are repaired by cell-free extracts considerably more than the adducts of 1,0,1/t,t,t. It has been suggested that the unique properties of long-range interstrand cross-links of bifunctional trinuclear platinum complexes and resulting conformational alterations in DNA have critical consequences for their antitumor effects.     

Bis[platinum(II)] and bis[platinum(IV)] complexes with optically active bis(vicinal-1,2-diamines) and their interaction with DNA.

Bis[platinum(II)] [Cl2Pt(LL)PtCl2] complexes 2,5 and 8 with chiral non-racemic ligands: 1a-c (LL = (R,R), (S,S) and (R,S) N,N'-bis(3,4-diaminobutyl)hexanediamide); 4a,b (LL = (R,R) and (S,S) N,N'-bis[3,4-bis(diaminobutyl)] urea); 7a-d (LL' = (R,R), (S,S), (R,S) and (S,R) 4,5-diamino-N-(3,4-diaminobutyl) pentanamide) and bis[platinum(IV)] complex 10-13 with ligands 1a,b and 4a,b have been prepared and characterized by IR, 1H, 13C and 195Pt NMR spectra. The interactions of 2a-c, 5a, 5b, 8a-d and 10a with dsDNA were investigated with the goal of examining whether the chirality, the nature of the spacer and the oxidation state have an influence on platinum-DNA binding properties. All the bis[platinum(II)] complexes form with dsDNA intra- and interstrand crosslinks and crosslinks over sticky ends, whereas the bis[platinum(IV)] complex 10a only forms intra- and interstrand crosslinks. The platinum-DNA coordination sites were determined by the T4 DNA polymerase footprinting method. The results show that all investigated bis(platinum) complexes have high preference towards distinct purines. All isomeric bis(amide) 2a-c and mono(amide) 8a-d complexes exhibit nearly the same binding pattern, whereas the ureide complexes 5a and 5b have other coordination sites with higher sequence preference. Interestingly, the ureides 5a and 5b differ in their coordination sites not only in comparison to the bis(amides) 2a-c and mono(amides) 8a-d, but also between each other. The bis[platinum(IV)] complex 10a also differs in coordination sites in comparison to all the bis[platinum(II)] compounds.     

Comparison of chemical reactivity, cytotoxicity, interstrand cross-linking and DNA sequence specificity of bis(platinum) complexes containing monodentate or bidentate coordination spheres with their monomeric analogues

The properties of a new bis(platinum) complex containing two monodentate coordination spheres, [(trans-PtCl(NH3)2)2H2N(CH2)4NH2]Cl2 (1,1/t,t), are reported. Comparison is made with respect to chemical reactivity, in vitro biological activity in murine and tumor cells, DNA conformational changes, cross-linking efficiency, and sequence specificity between this complex and the previously reported complex containing two bidentate platinum atoms, [(Pt(mal)(NH3))2H2N(CH2)4NH2] (2,2/c,c), as well as with their respective monomeric analogues, [PtCl(dien)]Cl and cis-[PtCl2(NH3)2](cis-DDP). While both bis(platinum) complexes are active against cis-DDP-resistant cells, the monodentate bis(platinum) complex (1,1/t,t) has a lower resistance factor than the complex with bidentate coordination spheres (2,2/c,c). More importantly, this property is repeated in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line. DNA-binding studies show that DNA interstrand cross-linking is more efficient for the 1,1/t,t complex. DNA sequencing studies employing the exonuclease activity of T4-polymerase demonstrate that there are a variety of binding sites; some are common to all complexes and some common to both bis(platinum) complexes, while the monodentate 1,1/t,t species also reacts at unique sites, not attacked by any of the other complexes studied. The circular dichroism of CT DNA modified by the 1,1/t,t complex is also unique and is not seen for any of the other agents.     

Defects in interstrand cross-link uncoupling do not account for the extreme sensitivity of ERCC1 and XPF cells to cisplatin

The anticancer drug cisplatin reacts with DNA leading to the formation of interstrand and intrastrand cross-links that are the critical cytotoxic lesions. In contrast to cells bearing mutations in other components of the nucleotide excision repair apparatus (XPB, XPD, XPG and CSB), cells defective for the ERCC1-XPF structure-specific nuclease are highly sensitive to cisplatin. To determine if the extreme sensitivity of XPF and ERCC1 cells to cisplatin results from specific defects in the repair of either intrastrand or interstrand cross-links we measured the elimination of both lesions in a range of nucleotide excision repair Chinese hamster mutant cell lines, including XPF- and ERCC1-defective cells. Compared to the parental, repair-proficient cell line all the mutants tested were defective in the elimination of both classes of adduct despite their very different levels of increased sensitivity. Consequently, there is no clear relationship between initial incisions at interstrand cross-links or removal of intrastrand adducts and cellular sensitivity. These results demonstrate that the high cisplatin sensitivity of ERCC1 and XPF cells likely results from a defect other than in excision repair. In contrast to other conventional DNA cross-linking agents, we found that the repair of cisplatin adducts does not involve the formation of DNA double-strand breaks. Surprisingly, XRCC2 and XRCC3 cells are defective in the uncoupling step of cisplatin interstrand cross-link repair, suggesting that homologous recombination might be initiated prior to excision of this type of cross-link.     

Sequence specificity, conformation, and recognition by HMG1 protein of major DNA interstrand cross-links of antitumor dinuclear platinum complexes

Interactions of high mobility group (HMG) domain proteins with DNA modified by cisplatin plays a role in mechanisms underlying its antitumor activity. A structural motif recognized by HMG domain proteins on cisplatin-modified DNA is a stable, directional bend of the helix axis. In the present work, bending induced in DNA by major adducts of a novel class of antitumor compounds, represented by the formula [?trans-PtCl(NH(3))(2)?H(2)N(CH(2))(2-6)NH(2)]Cl(2), was investigated. The oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes containing various site-specific interstrand cross-links of these bifunctional dinuclear platinum drugs were purified and characterized by Maxam-Gilbert footprinting, chemical probing, and phasing assay. It was demonstrated that the cross-links of the dinuclear compounds bent the helix much less than those of cisplatin. Gel retardation assay revealed very weak recognition of DNA adducts of dinuclear complexes by HMG1 protein. Hence, the mediation of antitumor properties of dinuclear platinum complexes by HMG domain proteins is unlikely so that polynuclear platinum compounds may represent a novel class of platinum anticancer drugs acting by a different mechanism than cisplatin and its analogues. A further understanding of how polynuclear platinum compounds modify DNA and how these modifications are processed in cells should provide a rational basis for the design of new platinum drugs rather than searching for cisplatin analogues.     

Recognition of cisplatin adducts by cellular proteins

Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent. It reacts with nucleophilic bases in DNA and forms 1,2-d(ApG), 1,2-d(GpG) and 1,3-d(GpTpG) intrastrand crosslinks, interstrand crosslinks and monofunctional adducts. The presence of these adducts in DNA is through to be responsible for the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. The exact signal transduction pathway that leads to cell cycle arrest and cell death following treatment with the drug is not known but cell death is believed to be mediated by the recognition of the adducts by cellular proteins. Here we describe the structural information available for cisplatin and related platinum adducts, the interactions of the adducts with cellular proteins and the implications of these interactions for cell survival.     

Differential human nucleotide excision repair of paired and mispaired cisplatin-DNA adducts.

In order to understand the action of the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin, it is necessary to determine why some types of cisplatin-DNA intrastrand crosslinks are repaired better than others. Using cell extracts and circular duplex DNA, we compared nucleotide excision repair of uniquely placed 1,2-GG, 1,2-AG, and 1,3-GTG cisplatin-crosslinks, and a 2-acetylaminofluorene lesion. The 1,3 crosslink and the acetylaminofluorene lesion were repaired by normal cell extracts approximately 15-20 fold better than the 1,2 crosslinks. No evidence was found for selective shielding of 1,2 cisplatin crosslinks from repair by cellular proteins. Fractionation of cell extracts to remove putative shielding proteins did not improve repair of the 1,2-GG crosslink, and cell extracts did not selectively inhibit access of UvrABC incision nuclease to 1,2-GG crosslinks. The poorer repair of 1,2 crosslinks in comparison to the 1,3 crosslink is more likely a consequence of different structural alterations of the DNA helix. In support of this, a 1,2-GG-cisplatin crosslink was much better repaired when it was opposite one or two non-complementary thymines. Extracts from cells defective in the hMutSalpha mismatch binding activity also showed preferential repair of the 1,3 crosslink over the 1,2 crosslink, and increased repair of the 1,2 adduct when opposite thymines, showing that hMutSalphais not involved in the differential NER of these substrates in vitro. Mismatched cisplatin adducts could arise by translesion DNA synthesis, and improved repair of such adducts could promote cisplatin-induced mutagenesis in some cases.     

DNA modifications by a novel bifunctional trinuclear platinum phase I anticancer agent.

The DNA-binding profile of a novel, trinuclear platinum Phase I clinical agent (BBR3464) is summarized. The structure of BBR3464 is best described as two trans-[PtCl(NH3)2] units linked by a tetra-amine [trans-Pt(NH3)2{H2N(CH2)6NH2}2]2+ unit. The +4 charge of BBR3464, the presence of at least two Pt coordination units capable of binding to DNA, and the consequences of such DNA binding are remarkable departures from the cisplatin structural paradigm. The chemical and biological features argue that the drug should be considered the first clinical representative of an entirely new structural class of DNA-modifying anticancer agents. The high charge on BBR3464 facilitates rapid binding to DNA with a t1/2 of approximately 40 min, significantly faster than the neutral cisplatin. The melting temperature of DNA adducted by BBR3464 increased at low ionic strength but decreased in high salt for the same rb. This unusual behavior is in contrast to that of cisplatin. BBR3464 produces an unwinding angle of 14 degrees in negatively supercoiled pSP73 plasmid DNA, indicative of bifunctional DNA binding. Quantitation of interstrand DNA-DNA cross-linking in plasmid pSP73 DNA linearized by EcoRI indicated approximately 20% of the DNA to be interstrand cross-linked. While this is significantly higher than the value for cisplatin, it is, interestingly, lower than that for dinuclear platinum compounds such as [{trans-PtCl(NH3)2}2H2N(CH2)6NH2]2+ (BBR3005) where interstrand cross-linking efficiency may be as high as 70-90%. Either the presence of charge in the linker backbone or the increased distance between platinating moieties may contribute to this relatively decreased ability of BBR3464 to induce DNA interstrand cross-linking. Fluorescence experiments with ethidium bromide were consistent with the formation of long-range delocalized lesions on DNA produced by BBR3464. The sequence preference for BBR3464 on plasmid DNA was determined to the exact base pair by assaying extension of the polynucleotide by VentR(exo+) DNA polymerase. Strong sequence preference for single dG or d(GG) sites was suggested. The presence of relatively few blocks on DNA in comparison to either cisplatin or BBR3005 was indicative of high sequence selectivity. The following appropriate sequence where stop sites occur was chosen: [sequence: see text] molecular modeling on 1,4 interstrand (G'30 to G33) and 1,5 intrastrand (G33 to G29) cross-links further confirmed the similarity in energy between the two forms of cross-link. Finally, immunochemical analysis confirmed the unique nature of the DNA adducts formed by BBR3464. This analysis showed that antibodies raised to cisplatin-adducted DNA did not recognize DNA modified by BBR3464. In contrast, DNA modified by BBR3464 inhibited the binding of antibodies raised to transplatin-adducted DNA. Thus, the bifunctional binding of BBR3464 contains few similarities to that of cisplatin but may have a subset of adducts recognized as being similar to the transplatinum species. In summary, the results point to a unique profile of DNA binding for BBR3464, strengthening the original hypothesis that modification of DNA binding in manners distinct from that of cisplatin will also lead to a distinct and unique profile of antitumor activity.     

Mechanism of the formation of DNA-protein cross-links by antitumor cisplatin

DNA–protein cross-links are formed by various DNA-damaging agents including antitumor platinum drugs. The natures of these ternary DNA–Pt–protein complexes (DPCLs) can be inferred, yet much remains to be learned about their structures and mechanisms of formation. We investigated the origin of these DPCLs and their cellular processing on molecular level using gel electrophoresis shift assay. We show that in cell-free media cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II)] forms DPCLs more effectively than ineffective transplatin [trans-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II)]. Mechanisms of transformation of individual types of plain DNA adducts of the platinum complexes into the DPCLs in the presence of several DNA-binding proteins have been also investigated. The DPCLs are formed by the transformation of DNA monofunctional and intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin. In contrast, interstrand cross-links of cisplatin and monofunctional adducts of transplatin are stable in presence of the proteins. The DPCLs formed by cisplatin inhibit DNA polymerization or removal of these ternary lesions from DNA by nucleotide excision repair system more effectively than plain DNA intrastrand or monofunctional adducts. Thus, the bulky DNA–protein cross-links formed by cisplatin represent a more distinct and persisting structural motif recognized by the components of downstream cellular systems processing DNA damage considerably differently than the plain DNA adducts of this metallodrug.     

Walker rat carcinoma cells are exceptionally sensitive to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin) and other difunctional agents but not defective in the removal of platinum-DNA adducts

Cisplatin binds to cellular macromolecules (DNA, RNA and protein) to the same extent in wild-type Walker rat carcinoma cells and a variant sub-line of these cells resistant to cisplatin and to other difunctional, but not monofunctional cytotoxic agents. Wild-type Walker cells exhibit a unique sensitivity to DNA-bound cisplatin, while the resistant cells have a sensitivity that approximates to that of many normal and other tumour cell lines. Total DNA-bound adducts were lost from both sensitive and resistant Walker cells at similar rates. Equal numbers of DNA interstrand crosslinks and DNA-protein crosslinks were formed in both cell lines, and the rate of loss of both types of crosslinks was similar in the two lines. Therefore the unusual sensitivity of Walker cells to cisplatin is not due to a defect in their ability to remove these platinum-DNA adducts.     

Antitumor carboplatin is more toxic in tumor cells when photoactivated: enhanced DNA binding

Carboplatin, an analogue of "classical" cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II) (cisplatin), is a widely used second-generation platinum anticancer drug. Cytotoxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin is mediated by platinum-DNA adducts. Markedly higher concentrations of carboplatin are required, and the rate of adduct formation is considerably slower. The reduced toxic effects in tumor cells and a more acceptable side-effect profile are attributable to the lower reactivity of carboplatin with nucleophiles, since the cyclobutanedicarboxylate ligand is a poorer leaving group than the chlorides in cisplatin. Recently, platinum complexes were shown to be particularly attractive as potential photochemotherapeutic anticancer agents. Selective photoactivation of platinum complexes by irradiation of cancer cells may avoid enhancement of toxic side-effects, but may increase toxicity selectively in cancer cells and extend the application of photoactivatable platinum complexes to resistant cells and to a wider range of cancer types. Therefore, it was of interest to examine whether carboplatin can be affected by irradiation with light to the extent that its DNA binding and cytotoxic properties are altered. We have found that carboplatin is converted to species capable of enhanced DNA binding by UVA irradiation and consequently its toxicity in cancer cells is markedly enhanced. Recent advances in laser and fiber-optic technologies make it possible to irradiate also internal organs with light of highly defined intensity and wavelength. Thus, carboplatin is a candidate for use in photoactivated cancer chemotherapy.     

Different recognition of DNA modified by aatitumor cisplatin and its clinically ineffective trans isomer by tumor suppressor protein p53

The p53 gene encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein that is biologically activated in response to genotoxic stresses including treatment with anticancer platinum drugs. The DNA binding activity of p53 protein is crucial for its tumor suppressor function. DNA interactions of active wild-type human p53 protein with DNA fragments and oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes modified by antitumor cisplatin and its clinically ineffective trans isomer (transplatin) were investigated by using a gel mobility shift assay. It was found that DNA adducts of cisplatin reduced binding affinity of the consensus DNA sequence to p53, whereas transplatin adducts did not. This result was interpreted to mean that the precise steric fit required for the formation and stability of the tetrameric complex of p53 with the consensus sequence cannot be attained, as a consequence of severe conformational perturbations induced in DNA by cisplatin adducts. The results also demonstrate an increase of the binding affinity of p53 to DNA lacking the consensus sequence and modified by cisplatin but not by transplatin. In addition, only major 1,2-GG intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin are responsible for this enhanced binding affinity of p53. The data base on structures of various DNA adducts of cisplatin and transplatin reveals distinctive structural features of 1,2-intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin, suggesting a unique role for this adduct in the binding of p53 to DNA lacking the consensus sequence. The results support the hypothesis that the mechanism of antitumor activity of cisplatin may also be associated with its efficiency to affect the binding affinity of platinated DNA to active p53 protein.     

Incision of trivalent chromium [Cr(III)]-induced DNA damage by Bacillus caldotenax UvrABC endonuclease

Some hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]-containing compounds are lung carcinogens. Once within cells, Cr(VI) is reduced to trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] which displays an affinity for both DNA bases and the phosphate backbone. A diverse array of genetic lesions is produced by Cr including Cr-DNA monoadducts, DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), DNA-Cr-protein crosslinks (DPCs), abasic sites, DNA strand breaks and oxidized bases. Despite the large amount of information available on the genotoxicity of Cr, little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in the removal of these lesions from damaged DNA. Recent work indicates that nucleotide excision repair (NER) is involved in the processing of Cr-DNA adducts in human and rodent cells. In order to better understand this process at the molecular level and begin to identify the Cr-DNA adducts processed by NER, the incision of CrCl(3) [Cr(III)]-damaged plasmid DNA was studied using a thermal-resistant UvrABC NER endonuclease from Bacillus caldotenax (Bca). Treatment of plasmid DNA with Cr(III) (as CrCl(3)) increased DNA binding as a function of dose. For example, at a Cr(III) concentration of 1 microM we observed approximately 2 Cr(III)-DNA adducts per plasmid. At this same concentration of Cr(III) we found that approximately 17% of the plasmid DNA contained ICLs ( approximately 0.2 ICLs/plasmid). When plasmid DNA treated with Cr(III) (1 microM) was incubated with Bca UvrABC we observed approximately 0.8 incisions/plasmid. The formation of endonuclease IV-sensitive abasic lesions or Fpg-sensitive oxidized DNA bases was not detected suggesting that the incision of Cr(III)-damaged plasmid DNA by UvrABC was not related to the generation of oxidized DNA damage. Taken together, our data suggest that a sub-fraction of Cr(III)-DNA adducts is recognized and processed by the prokaryotic NER machinery and that ICLs are not necessarily the sole lesions generated by Cr(III) that are substrates for NER.     

Efficient processing of TFO-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks by the UvrABC nuclease

Photoreactive psoralens can form interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) in double-stranded DNA. In eubacteria, the endonuclease UvrABC plays a key role in processing psoralen ICLs. Psoralen-modified triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) can be used to direct ICLs to specific genomic sites. Previous studies of pyrimidine-rich methoxypsoralen–modified TFOs indicated that the TFO inhibits cleavage by UvrABC. Because different chemistries may alter the processing of TFO-directed ICLs, we investigated the effect of another type of triplex formed by purine-rich TFOs on the processing of 4′-(hydroxymethyl)-4,5′,8-trimethylpsoralen (HMT) ICLs by the UvrABC nuclease. Using an HMT-modified TFO to direct ICLs to a specific site, we found that UvrABC made incisions on the purine-rich strand of the duplex ~3 bases from the 3′-side and ~9 bases from the 5′-side of the ICL, within the TFO-binding region. In contrast to previous reports, the UvrABC nuclease cleaved the TFO-directed psoralen ICL with a greater efficiency than that of the psoralen ICL alone. Furthermore, the TFO was dissociated from its duplex binding site by UvrA and UvrB. As mutagenesis by TFO-directed ICLs requires nucleotide excision repair, the efficient processing of these lesions supports the use of triplex technology to direct DNA damage for genome modification.     

MutS preferentially recognizes cisplatin- over oxaliplatin-modified DNA

Loss of mismatch repair leads to tumor resistance by desensitizing cells to specific DNA-damaging agents, including the anticancer drug cisplatin. Cisplatin analogs with a diamminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, such as oxaliplatin and Pt(DACH)Cl(2), do not elicit resistance in mismatch repair-deficient cells and therefore present promising therapeutic agents. This study compared the interactions of the purified Escherichia coli mismatch repair protein MutS with DNA modified to contain cisplatin and DACH adducts. MutS recognized the cisplatin-modified DNA with 2-fold higher affinity in comparison to the DACH-modified DNA. ADP stimulated the binding of MutS to cisplatin-modified DNA, whereas it had no effect on the MutS interaction with DNA modified by DACH or EN adducts. In parallel cytotoxicity experiments, methylation-deficient E. coli dam mutants were 2-fold more sensitive to cisplatin than DACH compounds. A panel of recombination-deficient mutants showed striking sensitivity to both compounds, indicating that both types of adducts are strong replication blocks. The differential affinity of MutS for DNA modified with the different platinum analogs could provide the molecular basis for the distinctive cellular responses to cisplatin and oxaliplatin.