Identification of DNA regions required for mitotic and meiotic functions within the centromere of Schizosaccharomyces pombe chromosome I.

We have determined the structural organization and functional roles of centromere-specific DNA sequence repeats in cen1, the centromere region from chromosome I of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. cen1 is composed of various classes of repeated sequences designated K', K"(dgl), L, and B', arranged in a 34-kb inverted repeat surrounding a 4- to 5-kb nonhomologous central core. Artificial chromosomes containing various portions of the cen1 region were constructed and assayed for mitotic and meiotic centromere function in S. pombe. Deleting K' and L from the distal portion of one arm of the inverted repeat had no effect on mitotic centromere function but resulted in greatly increased precocious sister chromatid separation in the first meiotic division. A centromere completely lacking K' and L, but containing the central core, one copy of B' and K" in one arm, and approximately 2.5 kb of the core-proximal portion of B' in the other arm, was also fully functional mitotically but again did not maintain sister chromatid attachment in meiosis I. However, deletion of K" from this minichromosome resulted in complete loss of centromere function. Thus, one copy of at least a portion of the K" (dgl) repeat is absolutely required but is not sufficient for S. pombe centromere function. The long centromeric inverted-repeat region must be relatively intact to maintain sister chromatid attachment in meiosis I.     

Identification of healed terminal DNA fragments in linear minichromosomes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The minichromosome Ch16 of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is derived from the centromeric region of chromosome III. We show that Ch16 and a shorter derivative, Ch12, made by gamma-ray cleavage, are linear molecules of 530 and 280 kilobases, respectively. Each minichromosome has two novel telomeres, as shown by genomic Southern hybridization with an S. pombe telomere probe. Comparison by hybridization of the minichromosomes and their chromosomal counterparts showed no signs of gross rearrangement. Cosmid clones covering the ends of the long arms of Ch16 and Ch12 were isolated, and subcloned fragments that contained the breakage sites were identified. They are apparently unique in the genome. By hybridization and Bal 31 digestion, the ends appear to consist of the broken-end sequences directly associated with short stretches (about 300 base pairs) of new DNA that hybridizes to a cloned S. pombe telomere. They do not contain the telomere-adjacent repeated sequences that are present in the normal chromosomes. The sizes of the short telomeric stretches are roughly the same as those of the normal chromosomes. Our results show that broken chromosomal ends in S. pombe can be healed by the de novo addition of the short telomeric repeats. The formation of Ch16 must have required two breakage-healing events, whereas a single cleavage-healing event in the long arm of Ch16 yielded Ch12.     

Genetic and physical analyses of sister chromatid exchange in yeast meiosis.

We have used nonessential circular minichromosomes to monitor sister chromatid exchange during yeast meiosis. Genetic analysis shows that a 64-kb circular minichromosome undergoes sister chromatid exchange during 40% of meioses. This frequency is not reduced by the presence of a homologous linear minichromosome. Furthermore, sister chromatid exchange can be stimulated by the presence of a 12-kb ARG4 DNA fragment, which contains initiation sites for meiotic gene conversion. Using physical analysis, we have directly identified a product of sister chromatid exchange: a head-to-tail dimer form of a circular minichromosome. This dimer form is absent in a rad50S mutant strain, which is deficient in processing of the ends of meiosis-specific double-stranded breaks into single-stranded DNA tails. Our studies suggest that meiotic sister chromatid exchange is stimulated by the same mechanism as meiotic homolog exchange.     

Minichromosome analysis of chromosome pairing, disjunction, and sister chromatid cohesion in maize

With the advent of engineered minichromosome technology in plants, an understanding of the properties of small chromosomes is desirable. Twenty-two minichromosomes of related origin but varying in size are described that provide a unique resource to study such behavior. Fourteen minichromosomes from this set could pair with each other in meiotic prophase at frequencies between 25 and 100%, but for the smaller chromosomes, the sister chromatids precociously separated in anaphase I. The other eight minichromosomes did not pair with themselves, and the sister chromatids divided equationally at meiosis I. In plants containing one minichromosome, the sister chromatids also separated at meiosis I. In anaphase II, the minichromosomes progressed to one pole or the other. The maize (Zea mays) Shugoshin protein, which has been hypothesized to protect centromere cohesion in meiosis I, is still present at anaphase I on minichromosomes that divide equationally. Also, there were no differences in the level of phosphorylation of Ser-10 of histone H3, a correlate of cohesion, in the minichromosomes in which sister chromatids separated during anaphase I compared with the normal chromosomes. These analyses suggest that meiotic centromeric cohesion is compromised in minichromosomes depending on their size and cannot be maintained by the mechanisms used by normal-sized chromosomes.     

Functional analysis of a centromere from fission yeast: a role for centromere-specific repeated DNA sequences.

A circular minichromosome carrying functional centromere sequences (cen2) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe chromosome II behaves as a stable, independent genetic linkage group in S. pombe. The cen2 region was found to be organized into four large tandemly repeated sequence units which span over 80 kilobase pairs (kb) of untranscribed DNA. Two of these units occurred in a 31-kb inverted repeat that flanked a 7-kb central core of nonhomology. The inverted repeat region had centromere function, but neither the central core alone nor one arm of the inverted repeat was functional. Deletion of a portion of the repeated sequences that flank the central core had no effect on mitotic segregation functions or on meiotic segregation of a minichromosome to two of the four haploid progeny, but drastically impaired centromere-mediated maintenance of sister chromatid attachment in meiosis I. This requirement for centromere-specific repeated sequences could not be satisfied by introduction of random DNA sequences. These observations suggest a function for the heterochromatic repeated DNA sequences found in the centromere regions of higher eucaryotes.     

The centromeric K-type repeat and the central core are together sufficient to establish a functional Schizosaccharomyces pombe centromere.

The DNA requirements for centromere function in fission yeast have been investigated using a minichromosome assay system. Critical elements of Schizosaccharomyces pombe centromeric DNA are portions of the centromeric central core and sequences within a 2.1-kilobase segment found on all three chromosomes as part of the K-type (K/K"/dg) centromeric repeat. The S. pombe centromeric central core contains DNA sequences that appear functionally redundant, and the inverted repeat motif that flanks the central core in all native fission yeast centromeres is not essential for centromere function in circular minichromosomes. Tandem copies of centromeric repeat K", in conjunction with the central core, exert an additive effect on centromere function, increasing minichromosome mitotic stability with each additional copy. Centromeric repeats B and L, however, and parts of the central core and its core-associated repeat are dispensable and cannot substitute for K-type sequences. Several specific protein binding sites have been identified within the centromeric K-type repeat, consistent with a recently proposed model for centromere/kinetochore function in S. pombe.     

A large circular minichromosome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires a high dose of type II DNA topoisomerase for its stabilization

We have constructed circular minichromosomes, ranging in size from 36 to 110 kb, containing the centromeric repeats of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cen3. Comparison of their mitotic stability showed that the circular minichromosomes became more unstable with increasing in size, however, a linear cen3 minichromosome, which is almost the same size as the largest circular one tested, does not show such instability. High levels of expression of the top2 ⁺ (type II DNA topoisomerase; topo II) but not top1 ⁺ gene (type I DNA topoisomerase) suppressed the instability of the largest circular minichromosome, whereas partial inactivation of topo II dramatically destabilized the minichromosome. A mutant topo II, defective in nuclear localization but still retaining its in vitro relaxation activity, did not stabilize the circular minichromosome. These results indicate that endogenous type II DNA topoisomerase is insufficient for accurate segregation of the circular minichromosome. In addition, the replication of the minichromosomal DNA appears to proceed normally, because the presence of the unstable minichromosome did not cause G2 delay. A likely cause of the instability is intertwining of the minichromosome DNA possibly occuring after DNA replication. An interaction between topo II and the centromeric repeats is implied by the finding that multiple copies of the centromeric repeat, dg-dh, affect stability of the minichromosome similarly to top2 ⁺ gene dosage.     

A large circular minichromosome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires a high dose of type II DNA topoisomerase for its stabilization

We have constructed circular minichromosomes, ranging in size from 36 to 110 kb, containing the centromeric repeats of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cen3. Comparison of their mitotic stability showed that the circular minichromosomes became more unstable with increasing in size, however, a linear cen3 minichromosome, which is almost the same size as the largest circular one tested, does not show such instability. High levels of expression of the top2 ⁺ (type II DNA topoisomerase; topo II) but not top1 ⁺ gene (type I DNA topoisomerase) suppressed the instability of the largest circular minichromosome, whereas partial inactivation of topo II dramatically destabilized the minichromosome. A mutant topo II, defective in nuclear localization but still retaining its in vitro relaxation activity, did not stabilize the circular minichromosome. These results indicate that endogenous type II DNA topoisomerase is insufficient for accurate segregation of the circular minichromosome. In addition, the replication of the minichromosomal DNA appears to proceed normally, because the presence of the unstable minichromosome did not cause G2 delay. A likely cause of the instability is intertwining of the minichromosome DNA possibly occuring after DNA replication. An interaction between topo II and the centromeric repeats is implied by the finding that multiple copies of the centromeric repeat, dg-dh, affect stability of the minichromosome similarly to top2 ⁺ gene dosage.     

A new role for the transcriptional corepressor SIN3; regulation of centromeres

Centromeres play a vital role in maintaining the genomic stability of eukaryotes by coordinating the equal distribution of chromosomes to daughter cells during mitosis and meiosis. Fission yeast (S. pombe) centromeres consist of a 4-9 kb central core region and 30-100 kb of flanking inner (imr/B) and outer (otr/K) repeats. These sequences direct a laminar kinetochore structure similar to that of human centromeres. Centromeric heterochromatin is generally underacetylated. We have previously shown that inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs) caused hyperacetylation of centromeres and defective chromosome segregation. SIN3 is a HDAC corepressor that has the ability to mediate HDAC targeting in the repression of promoters. In this study, we have characterized S. pombe sin three corepressors (Pst1p and Pst2p) to investigate whether SIN3-HDAC is required in the regulation of centromeres. We show that only pst1-1 and not pst2Delta cells displayed anaphase defects and thiabendazole sensitivity. pst1-1 cells showed reduced centromeric silencing, increased histone acetylation in centromeric chromatin, and defective centromeric sister chromatid cohesion. The HDAC Clr6p and Pst1p coimmunoprecipitated, and Pst1p colocalized with centromeres, particularly in binucleate cells. These data are consistent with a model in which Pst1p-Clr6p temporally associate with centromeres to carry out the initial deacetylation necessary for subsequent steps in heterochromatin formation.     

Cohesin interaction with centromeric minichromosomes shows a multi-complex rod-shaped structure

Cohesin is the protein complex responsible for maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin interacts with centromeres and specific loci along chromosome arms known as Chromosome Attachment Regions (CARs). The cohesin holocomplex contains four subunits. Two of them, Smc1p (Structural maintenance of chromosome 1 protein) and Smc3p, are long coiled-coil proteins, which heterodimerize with each other at one end. They are joined together at the other end by a third subunit, Scc1p, which also binds to the fourth subunit, Scc3p. How cohesin interacts with chromosomes is not known, although several models have been proposed, in part on the basis of in vitro assembly of purified cohesin proteins. To be able to observe in vivo cohesin-chromatin interactions, we have modified a Minichromosome Affinity Purification (MAP) method to isolate a CAR-containing centromeric minichromosome attached to in vivo assembled cohesin. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis of these minichromosomes suggests that cohesin assumes a rod shape and interacts with replicated minichromosome at one end of that rod. Additionally, our data implies that more than one cohesin molecule interacts with each pair of replicated minichromsomes. These molecules seem to be packed into a single thick rod, suggesting that the Smc1p and Smc3p subunits may interact extensively.     

Sister-chromatid cohesion via MEI-S332 and kinetochore assembly are separable functions of the Drosophila centromere

Attachment, or cohesion, between sister chromatids is essential for their proper segregation in mitosis and meiosis [1,2]. Sister chromatids are tightly apposed at their centromeric regions, but it is not known whether this is due to cohesion at the functional centromere or at flanking centric heterochromatin. The Drosophila MEI-S332 protein maintains sister-chromatid cohesion at the centromeric region [3]. By analyzing MEI-S332's localization requirements at the centromere on a set of minichromosome derivatives [4], we tested the role of heterochromatin and the relationship between cohesion and kinetochore formation in a complex centromere of a higher eukaryote. The frequency of MEI-S332 localization is decreased on minichromosomes with compromised inheritance, despite the consistent presence of two kinetochore proteins. Furthermore, MEI-S332 localization is not coincident with kinetochore outer-plate proteins, suggesting that it is located near the DNA. We conclude that MEI-S332 localization is driven by the functional centromeric chromatin, and binding of MEI-S332 is regulated independently of kinetochore formation. These results suggest that in higher eukaryotes cohesion is controlled by the functional centromere, and that, in contrast to yeast [5], the requirements for cohesion are separable from those for kinetochore assembly.     

Cohesin's concatenation of sister DNAs maintains their intertwining

The contribution of DNA catenation to sister chromatid cohesion is unclear partly because it has never been observed directly within mitotic chromosomes. Differential sedimentation-velocity and gel electrophoresis reveal that sisters of 26 kb circular minichromosomes are held together by catenation as well as by cohesin. The finding that chemical crosslinking of cohesin's three subunit interfaces entraps sister DNAs of circular but not linear minichromosomes implies that cohesin functions using a topological principle. Importantly, cohesin holds both catenated and uncatenated DNAs together in this manner. In the vicinity of centromeres, catenanes are resolved by spindle forces, but linkages mediated directly by cohesin resist these forces even after complete decatenation. Crucially, persistence of catenation after S phase depends on cohesin. We conclude that by retarding Topo II-driven decatenation, cohesin mediates sister chromatid cohesion by an indirect mechanism as well as one involving entrapment of sister DNAs inside its tripartite ring.     

粟酒裂殖酵母染色体DNA的脉冲电泳分析

采用等高锁状均质电场（CHEF）凝胶电泳技术,对来自中国微生物菌种保藏委员会普通微生物中心的粟酒裂殖酵母（Schizosaccharomycespombe）菌株AS2.214进行染色体DNA分析。CHEF电泳结果显示菌株AS2.214的4条染色体DNA的分子大小分别约为5900kb、3200kb、2500kb和550kb,基因组大小约为12000kb。供试菌株AS2.214第Ⅰ条染色体DNA为5900kb与已研究报道的菌株972h和HM248（5700kb）的基本一致,第Ⅱ条染色体DNA（3200kb）和第皿条染色体DNA（2500kb）,分别较上述2个菌株约小1400kb和1000kb,第Ⅳ条染色体DNA的分子大小与部分非整倍体菌株HM248的极微染色体Ch16DNA相近（500kb）。研究结果表明粟酒裂殖酵母菌株间染色体DNA长度存在显著差异,菌株AS2.214可能是三倍体减数分裂所产生的稳定的部分非整倍体。     

Sister chromatid cohesion along arms and at centromeres

There is an obvious difference between the regulation of sister chromatid cohesion at centromeres and along chromosome arms during meiosis, because centromeric cohesion, but not arm cohesion, persists throughout anaphase of the first meiotic division. This regional difference of sister chromatid cohesion is also observed during mitosis; the cohesion is much more robust at the centromere at metaphase, where it antagonizes the pulling force of spindle microtubules that attach to the kinetochores from opposite poles. Recent studies have illuminated the underlying molecular mechanisms that strengthen and protect centromeric cohesion in mitosis and meiosis, and the central role of a conserved protein, shugoshin.     

Separase Is Required for Homolog and Sister Disjunction during Drosophila melanogaster Male Meiosis,but Not for Biorientation of Sister Centromeres

Spatially controlled release of sister chromatid cohesion during progression through the meiotic divisions is of paramount importance for error-free chromosome segregation during meiosis. Cohesion is mediated by the cohesin protein complex and cleavage of one of its subunits by the endoprotease separase removes cohesin first from chromosome arms during exit from meiosis I and later from the pericentromeric region during exit from meiosis II. At the onset of the meiotic divisions, cohesin has also been proposed to be present within the centromeric region for the unification of sister centromeres into a single functional entity, allowing bipolar orientation of paired homologs within the meiosis I spindle. Separase-mediated removal of centromeric cohesin during exit from meiosis I might explain sister centromere individualization which is essential for subsequent biorientation of sister centromeres during meiosis II. To characterize a potential involvement of separase in sister centromere individualization before meiosis II, we have studied meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster males where homologs are not paired in the canonical manner. Meiosis does not include meiotic recombination and synaptonemal complex formation in these males. Instead, an alternative homolog conjunction system keeps homologous chromosomes in pairs. Using independent strategies for spermatocyte-specific depletion of separase complex subunits in combination with time-lapse imaging, we demonstrate that separase is required for the inactivation of this alternative conjunction at anaphase I onset. Mutations that abolish alternative homolog conjunction therefore result in random segregation of univalents during meiosis I also after separase depletion. Interestingly, these univalents become bioriented during meiosis II, suggesting that sister centromere individualization before meiosis II does not require separase.     

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rdh54 (TID1) acts with Rhp54 (RAD54) to repair meiotic double-strand breaks

We report the characterization of rdh54+, the second fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad54 homolog. rdh54+ shares sequence and functional homology to budding yeast RDH54/TID1. Rdh54p is present during meiosis with appropriate timing for a meiotic recombination factor. It interacts with Rhp51 and the meiotic Rhp51 homolog Dmc1 in yeast two-hybrid assays. Deletion of rdh54+ has no effect on DNA damage repair during the haploid vegetative cell cycle. In meiosis, however, rdh54Delta shows decreased spore viability and homologous recombination with a concomitant increase in sister chromatid exchange. The rdh54Delta single mutant repairs meiotic breaks with similar timing to wild type, suggesting redundancy of meiotic recombination factors. Consistent with this, the rdh54Delta rhp54Delta double mutant fails to repair meiotic double strand breaks. Live cell analysis shows that rdh54Delta rhp54Delta asci do not arrest, but undergo both meiotic divisions with near normal timing, suggesting that failure to repair double strand breaks in S. pombe meiosis does not result in checkpoint arrest.     

The unique centromeric chromatin structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is maintained during meiosis

In meiosis I sister centromeres are unified in their polarity on the spindle, and this unique behavior is known to require the function of meiosis-specific factors that set some intrinsic property of the centromeres. The fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, possesses complex centromeres consisting of repetitive DNA elements, making it an excellent model in which to study the behavior of complex centromeres. In mitosis, during which sister centromeres mediate chromosome segregation by establishing bipolar chromosome attachments to the spindle, the central core of the S. pombe centromere chromatin has a unique irregular nucleosome pattern. Deletion of repeats flanking this core structure have no effect on mitotic chromosome segregation, but have profound effects during meiosis. While this demonstrates that the outer repeats are critical for normal meiotic sister centromere behavior, exactly how they function and how monopolarity is established remains unclear. In this study we provide the first analysis of the chromatin structure of a complex centromere during meiosis. We show that the nature and extent of the unique central core chromatin structure is maintained with no measurable expansion. This demonstrates that monopolarity of sister centromeres, and subsequent reversion to bipolarity, does not involve a global change to the centromeric chromatin structure.     

Shugoshin protects cohesin complexes at centromeres

The different regulation of sister chromatid cohesion at centromeres and along chromosome arms is obvious during meiosis, because centromeric cohesion, but not arm cohesion, persists throughout anaphase of the first division. A protein required to protect centromeric cohesin Rec8 from separase cleavage has been identified and named shugoshin (or Sgo1) after shugoshin ("guardian spirit" in Japanese). It has become apparent that shugoshin shows marginal homology with Drosophila Mei-S332 and several uncharacterized proteins in other eukaryotic organisms. Because Mei-S332 is a protein previously shown to be required for centromeric cohesion in meiosis, it is now established that shugoshin represents a conserved protein family defined as a centromeric protector of Rec8 cohesin complexes in meiosis. The regional difference of sister chromatid cohesion is also observed during mitosis in vertebrates; the cohesion is much more robust at the centromere at metaphase, where it antagonizes the pulling force of spindle microtubules that attach the kinetochores from opposite poles. The human shugoshin homologue (hSgo1) is required to protect the centromeric localization of the mitotic cohesin, Scc1, until metaphase. Bub1 plays a crucial role in the localization of shugoshin to centromeres in both fission yeast and humans.     

Kinetochore individualization in meiosis I is required for centromeric cohesin removal in meiosis II

Partitioning of the genome in meiosis occurs through two highly specialized cell divisions, named meiosis I and meiosis II. Step‐wise cohesin removal is required for chromosome segregation in meiosis I, and sister chromatid segregation in meiosis II. In meiosis I, mono‐oriented sister kinetochores appear as fused together when examined by high‐resolution confocal microscopy, whereas they are clearly separated in meiosis II, when attachments are bipolar. It has been proposed that bipolar tension applied by the spindle is responsible for the physical separation of sister kinetochores, removal of cohesin protection, and chromatid separation in meiosis II. We show here that this is not the case, and initial separation of sister kinetochores occurs already in anaphase I independently of bipolar spindle forces applied on sister kinetochores, in mouse oocytes. This kinetochore individualization depends on separase cleavage activity. Crucially, without kinetochore individualization in meiosis I, bivalents when present in meiosis II oocytes separate into chromosomes and not sister chromatids. This shows that whether centromeric cohesin is removed or not is determined by the kinetochore structure prior to meiosis II.     

The Yin and Yang of centromeric cohesion of sister chromatids: mitotic kinases meet protein phosphatase 2A

Accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis and mitosis is essential for the maintenance of genomic stability. Defects in the regulation of chromosome segregation during division predispose cells to undergo mitotic catastrophe or neoplastic transformation. Cohesin, a molecular glue holding sister chromatids together, is removed from chromosomes in a stepwise fashion during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesin at centromeres but not on chromosome arm remains intact until anaphase onset during early mitosis and the initiation of anaphase II during meiosis. Several recent studies indicate that the activity of protein phosphatase 2A is essential for maintaining the integrity of centromeric cohesin. Shugoshin, a guardian for sister chromatid segregation, may cooperate with and/or mediate PP2A function by suppressing the phosphorylation status of centromeric proteins including cohesin.