The ligands of CXC chemokine receptor 3, I-TAC, Mig, and IP10, are natural antagonists for CCR3

Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes express a different repertoire of chemokine receptors (CCRs). CXCR3, the receptor for I-TAC (interferon-inducible T cell alpha-chemoattractant), Mig (monokine induced by gamma-interferon), and IP10 (interferon-inducible protein 10), is expressed preferentially on Th1 cells, whereas CCR3, the receptor for eotaxin and several other CC chemokines, is characteristic of Th2 cells. While studying responses that are mediated by these two receptors, we found that the agonists for CXCR3 act as antagonists for CCR3. I-TAC, Mig, and IP10 compete for the binding of eotaxin to CCR3-bearing cells and inhibit migration and Ca(2+) changes induced in such cells by stimulation with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, MCP-2 (monocyte chemottractant protein-2), MCP-3, MCP-4, and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted). A hybrid chemokine generated by substituting the first eight NH(2)-terminal residues of eotaxin with those of I-TAC bound CCR3 with higher affinity than eotaxin or I-TAC (3- and 10-fold, respectively). The hybrid was 5-fold more potent than I-TAC as an inhibitor of eotaxin activity and was effective at concentrations as low as 5 nm. None of the antagonists described induced the internalization of CCR3, indicating that they lack agonistic effects and thus qualify as pure antagonists. These results suggest that chemokines that attract Th1 cells via CXCR3 can concomitantly block the migration of Th2 cells in response to CCR3 ligands, thus enhancing the polarization of T cell recruitment.     

Functional differences between monocyte chemotactic protein-1 receptor A and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 receptor B expressed in a Jurkat T cell

The monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) receptor (MCP-1R) is expressed on monocytes, a subpopulation of memory T lymphocytes, and basophils. Two alternatively spliced forms of MCP-1R, CCR2A and CCR2B, exist and differ only in their carboxyl-terminal tails. To determine whether CCR2A and CCR2B receptors function similarly, Jurkat T cells were stably transfected with plasmids encoding the human CCR2A or CCR2B gene. Nanomolar concentrations of MCP-1 induced chemotaxis in the CCR2B transfectants that express high, intermediate, and low levels of MCP-1R. Peak chemotactic activity was shifted to the right as receptor number decreased. Five-fold more MCP-1 was required to initiate chemotaxis of the CCR2A low transfectant, but the peak of chemotaxis was similar for the CCR2A and CCR2B transfectants expressing similar numbers of receptors. MCP-1-induced chemotaxis was sensitive to pertussis toxin, implying that both CCR2A and CCR2B are G(i)alpha protein coupled. MCP-1 induced a transient Ca(2+) flux in the CCR2B transfectant that was partially sensitive to pertussis toxin. In contrast, MCP-1 did not induce Ca(2+) flux in the CCR2A transfectant. Since MCP-1 can stimulate chemotaxis of the CCR2A transfectant without inducing Ca(2+) mobilization, Ca(2+) flux may not be required for MCP-1-induced chemotaxis in the Jurkat transfectants. These results indicate that functional differences exist between the CCR2A and CCR2B transfectants that can be attributed solely to differences in the carboxyl-terminal tail.     

CCR11 is a functional receptor for the monocyte chemoattractant protein family of chemokines

Chemokines mediate their diverse activities through G protein-coupled receptors. The human homolog of the bovine orphan receptor PPR1 shares significant similarity to chemokine receptors. Transfection of this receptor into murine L1.2 cells resulted in responsiveness to monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-4, MCP-2, and MCP-1 in chemotaxis assays. Binding studies with radiolabeled MCP-4 demonstrated a single high affinity binding site with an IC(50) of 0.14 nM. As shown by competition binding, other members of the MCP family also recognized this receptor. MCP-2 was the next most potent ligand, with an IC(50) of 0.45 nM. Surprisingly, eotaxin (IC(50) = 6.7 nM) and MCP-3 (IC(50) = 4.1 nM) bind with greater affinity than MCP-1 (IC(50) = 10.7 nM) but only act as agonists in chemotaxis assays at 100-fold higher concentrations. Because of high affinity binding and functional chemotactic responses, we have termed this receptor CCR11. The gene for CCR11 was localized to human chromosome 3q22, which is distinct from most CC chemokine receptor genes at 3p21. Northern blot hybridization was used to identify CCR11 expression in heart, small intestine, and lung. Thus CCR11 shares functional similarity to CCR2 because it recognizes members of the MCP family, but CCR11 has a distinct expression pattern.     

Chemokine receptor homo- or heterodimerization activates distinct signaling pathways

Chemokine receptors of both the CC and CXC families have been demonstrated to undergo a ligand-mediated homodimerization process required for Ca2+ flux and chemotaxis. We show that, in the chemokine response, heterodimerization is also permitted between given receptor pairs, specifically between CCR2 and CCR5. This has functional consequences, as the CCR2 and CCR5 ligands monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell-expressed and secreted) cooperate to trigger calcium responses at concentrations 10- to 100-fold lower than the threshold for either chemokine alone. Heterodimerization results in recruitment of each receptor-associated signaling complex, but also recruits dissimilar signaling path ways such as G(q/11) association, and delays activation of phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase. The consequences are a pertussis toxin-resistant Ca2+ flux and trig gering of cell adhesion rather than chemotaxis. These results show the effect of heterodimer formation on increasing the sensitivity and dynamic range of the chemokine response, and may aid in understanding the dynamics of leukocytes at limiting chemokine concentrations in vivo.     

Human B cells become highly responsive to macrophage-inflammatory protein-3 alpha/CC chemokine ligand-20 after cellular activation without changes in CCR6 expression or ligand binding

CCR6 is the only known receptor for the chemokine macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-3alpha/CC chemokine ligand (CCL)20. We have shown previously that CCR6 is expressed on peripheral blood B cells, but CCR6 activity on these cells is low in in vitro assays. We report that MIP-3alpha/CCL20-induced calcium flux and chemotaxis can be enhanced significantly on peripheral blood and tonsillar B cells after activation by cross-linking surface Ag receptors. Of particular interest is the fact that the enhanced activity on B cells was not associated with an increase in CCR6 expression as assessed by levels of receptor mRNA, surface staining, or MIP-3alpha/CCL20 binding sites, or by a change in the affinity of the receptor for ligand. These data convincingly demonstrate that responses to a chemokine can be regulated solely by changes in the downstream pathways for signal transduction resulting from Ag receptor activation, and establish CCR6 as an efficacious receptor on human B cells.     

Human NK cells express CC chemokine receptors 4 and 8 and respond to thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, macrophage-derived chemokine, and I-309

NK cells respond to various chemokines, suggesting that they express receptors for these chemokines. In this paper, we show that IL-2-activated NK (IANK) cells express CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) and CCR8, as determined by flow cytometric, immunoblot, and RNase protection assays. Macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC), the ligand for CCR4, induces the phosphorylation of CCR4 within 0.5 min of activating IANK cells with this ligand. This is corroborated with the recruitment of G protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 and 3 and their association with CCR4 in IANK cell membranes. Also, CCR4 is internalized between 5 and 45 min but reappears in the membranes after 60 min of stimulation with MDC. MDC, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), and I-309 induce the chemotaxis of IANK cells, an activity that is inhibited upon pretreatment of these cells with pertussis toxin, suggesting that receptors for these chemokines are coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. In the calcium release assay, cross-desensitization experiments showed that TARC completely desensitizes the calcium flux response induced by MDC or I-309, whereas both MDC and I-309 partially desensitize the calcium flux response induced by TARC. These results suggest that TARC utilizes CCR4 and CCR8. Our results are the first to show that IL-2-activated NK cells express CCR4 and CCR8, suggesting that these receptors are not exclusive for Th2 cells.     

CXC chemokine ligand 4 (CXCL4) down-regulates CC chemokine receptor expression on human monocytes

During acute inflammation, monocytes are essential in abolishing invading micro-organisms and encouraging wound healing. Recruitment by CC chemokines is an important step in targeting monocytes to the inflamed tissue. However, cell surface expression of the corresponding chemokine receptors is subject to regulation by various endogenous stimuli which so far have not been comprehensively identified. We report that the platelet-derived CXC chemokine ligand 4 (CXCL4), a known activator of human monocytes, induces down-regulation of CC chemokine receptors (CCR) 1, -2, and -5, resulting in drastic impairment of monocyte chemotactic migration towards cognate CC chemokine ligands (CCL) for these receptors. Interestingly, CXCL4-mediated down-regulation of CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 was strongly dependent on the chemokine's ability to stimulate autocrine/paracrine release of TNF-α. In turn, TNF-α induced the secretion CCL3 and CCL4, two chemokines selective for CCR1 and CCR5, while the secretion of CCR2-ligand CCL2 was TNF-α-independent. Culture supernatants of CXCL4-stimulated monocytes as well as chemokine-enriched preparations thereof reproduced CXCL4-induced CCR down-regulation. In conclusion, CXCL4 may act as a selective regulator of monocyte migration by stimulating the release of autocrine, receptor-desensitizing chemokine ligands. Our results stress a co-ordinating role for CXCL4 in the cross-talk between platelets and monocytes during early inflammation.     

Nonrequirement of continuous stimulation with MCP-1 for cell migration and determination of directional migration by initial stimulation with chemokine

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) induces monocyte migration through interaction with the MCP-1 receptor CCR2. In this report we have examined the length of chemokine stimulation necessary for induction of cell migration and whether continuous stimulation is required for active migration. Monocytic THP-1 cells prestimulated with MCP-1 for 15 to 30 min exhibited a migration response after the chemokine was removed from the culture medium, indicating that a short exposure to chemokine stimulation is sufficient for migration of THP-1 cells and continuous stimulation is not required for active migration. A reverse gradient of MCP-1 had no effect on migration after prestimulation with MCP-1. This implies that cells are determined to directionally migrate by initial stimulation with MCP-1. Furthermore, cell migration after prestimulation with MCP-1 was inhibited by a p38 inhibitor, but not by a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) inhibitor, indicating that p38, but not PI3-kinase, is involved in the migration response after the determination of direction by initial chemokine stimulation.     

Differential involvement of Galpha16 in CC chemokine-induced stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta, ERK, and chemotaxis

Chemokines are known to regulate the chemotaxis of leukocytes and play an important role in immunological processes. Chemokine receptors are widely distributed in hematopoietic cells and are often co-localized with the hematopoietic-specific G(16) and its close relative, G(14). Yet, many chemokine receptors utilize pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i) proteins for signaling. Given that both G(16) and G(14) are capable of linking G(i)-coupled receptors to the stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta, we examined the capacity of six CC chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR2a, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5 and CCR7) to interact with G(14) and G(16) in a heterologous expression system. Among the CC chemokine receptors tested, CCR1, CCR2b, and CCR3 were capable of mediating chemokine-induced stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta via either G(14) or G(16). The G(14)/G(16)-mediated responses exhibited CC chemokine dose-dependency and were resistant to pertussis toxin (PTX) treatment. In contrast, CCR2a, CCR5 and CCR7 were unable to interact with G(14) and G(16). Under identical experimental conditions, all six CC chemokine receptors were fully capable of inhibiting adenylyl cyclase via G(i) as well as stimulating phospholipase Cbeta via 16z44, a G(16/z) chimera that possesses increased promiscuity toward G(i)-coupled receptors. Moreover, CCR1-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was largely PTX-insensitive in THP-1 monocytic cells that endogenously express Galpha(16). In addition, CCR1 agonist was less efficacious in mediating chemotaxis of THP-1 cells following the knockdown of Galpha(16) by overexpressing siRNA, indicating the participation of Galpha(16) in CCR1-induced cell migration. These results show that different CC chemokine receptors can discriminate against G(14) and G(16) for signal transduction.     

Eotaxin and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 use different modes of action

Eotaxin selectively binds CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3, whereas monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-3 binds CCR1, CCR2, and CCR3. To identify the functional determinants of the chemokines, we generated four reciprocal chimeric chemokines-M10E9, M22E21, E8M11, and E20M23-by shuffling the N-terminus and N-loop of eotaxin and MCP-3. M22E21 and E8M11, which shared the N-loop from MCP-3, bound to monocytes with high affinity, and activated monocytes. In contrast, M10E9 and E20M23, which lacked the N-loop, failed to bind and transduce monocyte responses, identifying the N-loop of MCP-3 as the selectivity determinant for CCR1/CCR2. A BIAcore assay with an N-terminal peptide of CCR3 (residues 1-35) revealed that all chimeras except E20M23 exhibited varying degrees of binding affinity with commensurate chemotaxis activity of eosinophils. Surprisingly, E20M23 could neither bind the CCR3 peptide nor activate eosinophils, despite having both N-terminal motifs from eotaxin. These results suggest that the two N-terminal motifs of eotaxin must cooperate with other regions to successfully bind and activate CCR3.     

Capped diaminopropionamide-glycine dipeptides are inhibitors of CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2)

A new series of CCR2 antagonists has been discovered that incorporates intramolecular hydrogen bonding as a strategy for rigidifying the scaffold. The structure-activity relationship was established through initial systematic modification of substitution pattern and chain length, followed by independent optimization of three different substituents (benzylamine, carboxamide, and benzamide). Several of the acyclic compounds display 10-30 nM binding affinity for CCR2. Moreover, these antagonists are able to block both MCP-1-induced Ca(2+) flux and monocyte chemotaxis, and are selective for binding to CCR2 over CCR1 and CCR3.     

Differential recognition and scavenging of native and truncated macrophage-derived chemokine (macrophage-derived chemokine/CC chemokine ligand 22) by the D6 decoy receptor

The promiscuous D6 receptor binds several inflammatory CC chemokines and has been recently proposed to act as a chemokine-scavenging decoy receptor. The present study was designed to better characterize the spectrum of CC chemokines scavenged by D6, focusing in particular on CCR4 ligands and analyzing the influence of NH(2)-terminal processing on recognition by this promiscuous receptor. Using D6 transfectants, it was found that D6 efficiently bound and scavenged most inflammatory CC chemokines (CCR1 through CCR5 agonists). Homeostatic CC chemokines (CCR6 and CCR7 agonists) were not recognized by D6. The CCR4 agonists CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) and CCL22 bound to D6 with high affinity. CCL17 and CCL22 have no agonistic activity for D6 (chemotaxis and calcium fluxes), but were rapidly scavenged, resulting in reduced chemotactic activity on CCR4 transfectants. CD26 mediates NH(2) terminus processing of CCL22, leading to the production of CCL22 (3-69) and CCL22 (5-69) that do not interact with CCR4. These NH(2)-terminal truncated forms of CCL22 were not recognized by D6. The results presented in this study show that D6 recognizes and scavenges a wide spectrum of inflammatory CC chemokines, including the CCR4 agonists CCL22 and CCL17. However, this promiscuous receptor is not engaged by CD26-processed, inactive, CCL22 variants. By recognizing intact CCL22, but not its truncated variants, D6 expressed on lymphatic endothelial cells may regulate the traffic of CCR4-expressing cells, such as dendritic cells.     

Inhibition of the angiogenesis by the MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) binding peptide

The CC chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), plays a crucial role in the initiation of atherosclerosis and has direct effects that promote angiogenesis. To develop a specific inhibitor for MCP-1-induced angiogenesis, we performed in vitro selection employing phage display random peptide libraries. Most of the selected peptides were found to be homologous to the second extracellular loops of CCR2 and CCR3. We synthesized the peptide encoding the homologous sequences of the receptors and tested its effect on the MCP-1 induced angiogenesis. Surface plasmon resonance measurements demonstrated specific binding of the peptide to MCP-1 but not to the other homologous protein, MCP-3. Flow cytometry revealed that the peptide inhibited the MCP-1 binding to THP-1 monocytes. Moreover, CAM and rat aortic ring assays showed that the peptide inhibited MCP-1 induced angiogenesis. Our observations indicate that the MCP-1-binding peptide exerts its anti-angiogenic effect by interfering with the interaction between MCP-1 and its receptor.     

Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine (Eotaxin-3) that is a functional ligand of CC chemokine receptor 3.

Previously, we mapped the novel CC chemokine myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor 2 (MPIF-2)/eotaxin-2 to chromosome 7q11.23 (Nomiyama, H., Osborne, L. R., Imai, T., Kusuda, J., Miura, R., Tsui, L.-C., and Yoshie, O. (1998) Genomics 49, 339-340). Since chemokine genes tend to be clustered, unknown chemokines may be present in the vicinity of those mapped to new chromosomal loci. Prompted by this hypothesis, we analyzed the genomic region containing the gene for MPIF-2/eotaxin-2 (SCYA24) and have identified a novel CC chemokine termed eotaxin-3. The genes for MPIF-2/eotaxin-2 (SCYA24) and eotaxin-3 (SCYA26) are localized within a region of approximately 40 kilobases. By Northern blot analysis, eotaxin-3 mRNA was constitutively expressed in the heart and ovary. We have generated recombinant eotaxin-3 in a baculovirus expression system. Eotaxin-3 induced transient calcium mobilization specifically in CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3)-expressing L1.2 cells with an EC(50) of 3 nM. Eotaxin-3 competed the binding of (125)I-eotaxin to CCR3-expressing L1.2 cells with an IC(50) of 13 nM. Eotaxin-3 was chemotactic for normal peripheral blood eosinophils and basophils at high concentrations. Collectively, eotaxin-3 is yet another functional ligand for CCR3. The potency of eotaxin-3 as a CCR3 ligand seems, however, to be approximately 10-fold less than that of eotaxin. Identification of eotaxin-3 will further promote our understanding of the control of eosinophil trafficking and other CCR3-mediated biological phenomena. The strategy used in this study may also be applicable to identification of other unknown chemokine genes.     

Biological significance of chemokine receptor expression by normal human megakaryoblasts

The aim of this study was to learn more on the role of chemokines in the regulation of human megakryopoiesis. Normal human megakaryoblasts were expanded in serum-free liquid cultures and subsequently (1) phenotyped for expression of various chemokine receptors, (2) evaluated if chemokine receptors which they express are functional after stimulation by chemokines (calcium flux assay, chemotaxis, phosphorylation of MAPK-p42/44 and AKT proteins), and (3) investigated for expression and secretion of selected chemokines by employing RT-PCR and ELISA assays, respectively. In addition we also phenotyped peripheral blood platelets for expression of chemokine receptors and chemokines. We found that while human megakaryoblasts express several chemokine receptors (CXCR4, CCR6, CCR8, CCR5, CCR2 and CXCR3), CXCR4 was the only receptor detectable by FACS on human platelets. Moreover, among various chemokines tested, only SDF-1 (CXCR4 ligand) stimulated calcium flux and chemotaxis in normal human megakaryoblasts and phosphorylated MAPK-p42/44 and AKT in these cells. Although mRNAs for several chemokines were detectable by RT-PCR in normal human megakaryoblasts, only RANTES, IL-8, MCP-1 and PF-4 were found to be secreted by these cells. Finally we noticed that no chemokine tested in this study affected CFU-Meg colony formation by human CD34+ cells in serum-free cultures. We conclude that from all the chemokine receptor-chemokine axes tested, only SDF-1-CXCR4 axis was functional in assays employed in our studies, which further support the view that this axis plays a privileged role in regulating normal human megakaryopoiesis.     

Synthesis and evaluation of cis-3,4-disubstituted piperidines as potent CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) antagonists

A series of cis-3,4-disubstituted piperidines was synthesized and evaluated as CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) antagonists. Compound 24 emerged with an attractive profile, possessing excellent binding (CCR2 IC(50)=3.4 nM) and functional antagonism (calcium flux IC(50)=2.0 nM and chemotaxis IC(50)=5.4 nM). Studies to explore the binding of these piperidine analogs utilized a key CCR2 receptor mutant (E291A) with compound 14 and revealed a significant reliance on Glu291 for binding.     

Design and receptor interactions of obligate dimeric mutant of chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)

Chemokine-receptor interactions regulate leukocyte trafficking during inflammation. CC chemokines exist in equilibrium between monomeric and dimeric forms. Although the monomers can activate chemokine receptors, dimerization is required for leukocyte recruitment in vivo, and it remains controversial whether dimeric CC chemokines can bind and activate their receptors. We have developed an obligate dimeric mutant of the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) by substituting Thr(10) at the dimer interface with Cys. Biophysical analysis showed that MCP-1(T10C) forms a covalent dimer with similar structure to the wild type MCP-1 dimer. Initial cell-based assays indicated that MCP-1(T10C) could activate chemokine receptor CCR2 with potency reduced 1 to 2 orders of magnitude relative to wild type MCP-1. However, analysis of size exclusion chromatography fractions demonstrated that the observed activity was due to a small proportion of MCP-1(T10C) being monomeric and highly potent, whereas the majority dimeric form could neither bind nor activate CCR2 at concentrations up to 1 μM. These observations help to reconcile previous conflicting results and indicate that dimeric CC chemokines do not bind to their receptors with affinities approaching those of the corresponding monomeric chemokines.     

Differential effects of leukotactin-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha on neutrophils mediated by CCR1

The human CC chemokine leukotactin-1 (Lkn-1) is both a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes and a potent agonist for CCR1 and CCR3. However, human neutrophils do not migrate when the cells are stimulated with other human CC chemokines, such as human macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (hMIP-1 alpha) and eotaxin, which also use the CCR1 and CCR3 as their receptors. In this report, we demonstrate that while hMIP-1 alpha induced a negligible level of calcium flux and chemotaxis, Lkn-1 produced a high level of calcium flux and chemotaxis in human neutrophils. Lkn-1 cross-desensitized hMIP-1 alpha-induced calcium flux, but hMIP-1 alpha had little effect on the Lkn-1-induced response in human neutrophils. The same pattern was observed in peritoneal neutrophils from wild-type mice, whereas neutrophils from CCR1-/- mice failed to respond to either MIP-1 alpha or Lkn-1. Scatchard analysis revealed a single class of receptor for both hMIP-1 alpha and Lkn-1 on human neutrophils with dissociation constants (Kd) of 3.2 nM and 1.1 nM, respectively. We conclude that CCR1 is a receptor mediating responses to both MIP-1 alpha and Lkn-1 on neutrophils and produces different biological responses depending on the ligand bound.