Dual mode recognition of two isoacceptor tRNAs by mammalian mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase

Animal mitochondrial translation systems contain two serine tRNAs, corresponding to the codons AGY (Y = U and C) and UCN (N = U, C, A, and G), each possessing an unusual secondary structure; tRNA(GCU)(Ser) (for AGY) lacks the entire D arm, whereas tRNA(UGA)(Ser) (for UCN) has an unusual cloverleaf configuration. We previously demonstrated that a single bovine mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase (mt SerRS) recognizes these topologically distinct isoacceptors having no common sequence or structure. Recombinant mt SerRS clearly footprinted at the TPsiC loop of each isoacceptor, and kinetic studies revealed that mt SerRS specifically recognized the TPsiC loop sequence in each isoacceptor. However, in the case of tRNA(UGA)(Ser), TPsiC loop-D loop interaction was further required for recognition, suggesting that mt SerRS recognizes the two substrates by distinct mechanisms. mt SerRS could slightly but significantly misacylate mitochondrial tRNA(Gln), which has the same TPsiC loop sequence as tRNA(UGA)(Ser), implying that the fidelity of mitochondrial translation is maintained by kinetic discrimination of tRNAs in the network of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

The long extra arms of human tRNA((Ser)Sec) and tRNA(Ser) function as major identify elements for serylation in an orientation-dependent, but not sequence-specific manner.

Selenocysteine tRNA [tRNA((Ser)Sec)] is charged with serine by the same seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) as the canonical serine tRNAs. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have introduced a series of mutations into human tRNA((Ser)Sec) and tRNA(Ser) in order to study the identity elements of tRNA((Ser)Sec) for serylation and the effect of the orientation of the extra arm. Our results show that the long extra arm is one of the major identity elements for both tRNA(Ser) and tRNA((Ser)Sec) and gel retardation assays reveal that it appears to be a prerequisite for binding to the cognate synthetase. The long extra arm functions in an orientation-dependent, but not in a sequence-specific manner. The discriminator base G73 is another important identity element of tRNA((Ser)Sec), whereas the T- and D-arms play a minor role for the serylation efficiency.     

The contacts of yeast tRNA(Ser) with seryl-tRNA synthetase studied by footprinting experiments

Yeast tRNA(Ser) is a member of the class II tRNAs, whose characteristic is the presence of an extended variable loop. This additional structural feature raises questions about the recognition of these class II tRNAs by their cognate synthetase and the possibility of the involvement of the extra arm in the recognition process. A footprinting study of yeast tRNA(Ser) complexed with its cognate synthetase, yeast seryl-tRNA synthetase (an alpha 2 dimer), was undertaken. Chemical (ethylnitrosourea) and enzymatic (nucleases S1 and V1) probes were used in the experiments. A map of the contact points between the tRNA and the synthetase was established and results were analyzed with respect to a three-dimensional model of yeast tRNA(Ser). Regions in close vicinity with the synthetase are clustered on one face of tRNA. The extra arm, which is strongly protected from chemical modifications, appears as an essential part of the contact area. The anticodon triplet and a large part of the anticodon arm are, in contrast, still accessible to the probes when the complex is formed. These results are discussed in the context of the recognition of tRNAs in the aminoacylation reaction.     

Variant minihelix RNAs reveal sequence-specific recognition of the helical tRNA(Ser) acceptor stem by E.coli seryl-tRNA synthetase.

Aminoacylation rate determinations for a series of variant RNA minihelix substrates revealed that Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) recognizes the 1--72 through 5--68 base pairs of the E.coli tRNA(Ser) acceptor stem with the major recognition elements clustered between positions 2--71 and 4--69. The rank order of effects of canonical base pair substitutions at each position on kcat/Km was used to assess the involvement of major groove functional groups in recognition. Conclusions based on the biochemical data are largely consistent with the interactions revealed by the refined structure of the homologous Thermus thermophilus tRNA(Ser)-SerRS complex that Cusack and colleagues report in the accompanying paper. Disruption of an end-on hydrophobic interaction between the major groove C5(H) of pyrimidine 69 and an aromatic side chain of SerRS is shown to significantly decrease kcat/Km of a minihelix substrate. This type of interaction provides a means by which proteins can recognize the binary information of 'degenerate' sequences, such as the purine-pyrimidine base pairs of tRNA(Ser). The 3--70 base pair is shown to contribute to recognition by SerRS even though it is not contacted specifically by the protein. The latter effect derives from the organization of the specific contacts that SerRS makes with the neighboring 2--71 and 4--69 acceptor stem base pairs.     

A study of the interaction between tRNASer and seryl-tRNA synthetase from bovine liver

Study by chemical modification of Ser, Arg, His residues and sulfhydryl groups on bovine seryl-tRNA synthetase showed that Ser residues appeared to be unnecessary for the recognition mechanism, but Arg and His residues were essential. It was considered that different sulfhydryl groups related with each recognition of tRNA and ATP. Poly-arginine inhibited the interaction between serine tRNA and SerRS. The CD spectra of a mixture of serine tRNA and poly-arginine indicated that higher-order structure of tRNA changed. Furthermore, the Km and Vmax values of bovine serine isoacceptor, yeast serine tRNA and E. coli serine tRNA for bovine SerRS examined and it was discussed the differences of those base sequences.     

tRNA leucine identity and recognition sets

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are grouped into two classes based on the structure of their variable loop. In Escherichia coli, tRNAs from three isoaccepting groups are classified as type II. Leucine tRNAs comprise one such group. We used both in vivo and in vitro approaches to determine the nucleotides that are required for tRNA(Leu) function. In addition, to investigate the role of the tRNA fold, we compared the in vivo and in vitro characteristics of type I tRNA(Leu) variants with their type II counterparts.A minimum of six conserved tRNA(Leu) nucleotides were required to change the amino acid identity and recognition of a type II tRNA(Ser) amber suppressor from a serine to a leucine residue. Five of these nucleotides affect tRNA tertiary structure; the G15-C48 tertiary "Levitt base-pair" in tRNA(Ser) was changed to A15-U48; the number of nucleotides in the alpha and beta regions of the D-loop was changed to achieve the positioning of G18 and G19 that is found in all tRNA(Leu); a base was inserted at position 47n between the base-paired extra stem and the T-stem; in addition the G73 "discriminator" base of tRNA(Ser) was changed to A73. This minimally altered tRNA(Ser) exclusively inserted leucine residues and was an excellent in vitro substrate for LeuRS. In a parallel experiment, nucleotide substitutions were made in a glutamine-inserting type I tRNA (RNA(SerDelta); an amber suppressor in which the tRNA(Ser) type II extra-stem-loop is replaced by a consensus type I loop). This "type I" swap experiment was successful both in vivo and in vitro but required more nucleotide substitutions than did the type II swap. The type I and II swaps revealed differences in the contributions of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem base-pairs to tRNA(Leu) function: in the type I, but not the type II fold, leucine specificity was contingent on the presence of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem sequence. The type I and II tRNAs used in this study differed only in the sequence and structure of the variable loop. By altering this loop, and thereby possibly introducing subtle changes into the overall tRNA fold, it became possible to detect otherwise cryptic contributions of the acceptor stem sequence to recognition by LeuRS. Possible reasons for this effect are discussed.     

Structural flexibility of the methanogenic-type seryl-tRNA synthetase active site and its implication for specific substrate recognition

Seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) is a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that catalyzes serine activation and its transfer to cognate tRNA(Ser). Previous biochemical and structural studies have revealed that bacterial- and methanogenic-type SerRSs employ different strategies of substrate recognition. In addition to other idiosyncratic features, such as the active site zinc ion and the unique fold of the N-terminal tRNA-binding domain, methanogenic-type SerRS is, in comparison with bacterial homologues, characterized by a notable shortening of the motif 2 loop. Mutational analysis of Methanosarcina barkeri SerRS (mMbSerRS) was undertaken to identify the active site residues that ensure the specificity of amino acid and tRNA 3'-end recognition. Residues predicted to contribute to the amino acid specificity were selected for mutation according to the crystal structure of mMbSerRS complexed with its cognate aminoacyl-adenylate, whereas those involved in binding of the tRNA 3'-end were identified and mutagenized on the basis of modeling the mMbSerRS:tRNA complex. Although mMbSerRSs variants with an altered serine-binding pocket (W396A, N435A, S437A) were more sensitive to inhibition by threonine and cysteine, none of the mutants was able to activate noncognate amino acids to greater extent than the wild-type enzyme. In vitro kinetics results also suggest that conformational changes in the motif 2 loop are required for efficient serylation.     

The nucleotide sequences of several tRNA genes from rat mitochondria: common features and relatedness to homologous species.

We have determined the nucleotide sequences of thirteen rat mt tRNA genes. The features of the primary and secondary structures of these tRNAs show that those for Gln, Ser, and f-Met resemble, while those for Lys, Cys, and Trp depart strikingly from the universal type. The remainder are slightly abnormal. Among many mammalian mt DNA sequences, those of mt tRNA genes are highly conserved, thus suggesting for those genes an additional, perhaps regulatory, function. A simple evolutionary relationship between the tRNAs of animal mitochondria and those of eukaryotic cytoplasm, of lower eukaryotic mitochondria or of prokaryotes, is not evident owing to the extreme divergence of the tRNA sequences in the two groups. However, a slightly higher homology does exist between a few animal mt tRNAs and those from prokaryotes or from lower eukaryotic mitochondria.     

Translocation within the acceptor helix of a major tRNA identity determinant

The genetic code is defined by the specific aminoacylations of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Although the synthetases are widely conserved through evolution, aminoacylation of a given tRNA is often system specific-a synthetase from one source will not acylate its cognate tRNA from another. This system specificity is due commonly to variations in the sequence of a critical tRNA identity element. In bacteria and the cytoplasm of eukaryotes, an acceptor stem G3:U70 base pair marks a tRNA for aminoacylation with alanine. In contrast, Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) mitochondrial (mt) tRNA(Ala) has a G2:U71 but not a G3:U70 pair. Here we show that this translocated G:U and the adjacent G3:C70 are major determinants for recognition by Dm mt alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS). Additionally, G:U at the 3:70 position serves as an anti-determinant for Dm mt AlaRS. Consequently, the mitochondrial enzyme cannot charge cytoplasmic tRNA(Ala). All insect mitochondrial AlaRSs appear to have split apart recognition of mitochondrial from cytoplasmic tRNA(Ala) by translocation of G:U. This split may be essential for preventing introduction of ambiguous states into the genetic code.     

Nucleotide sequences of animal mitochondrial tRNAs(Met) possibly recognizing both AUG and AUA codons.

To elucidate the role of modified nucleosides of tRNA in mitochondrial translation systems, especially with regard to their codon recognition, we purified mitochondrial tRNAs(Met) isolated from liver of frog, chicken and rat, and determined their nucleotide sequences. All of these tRNAs(Met) were found to possess 5-formylcytidine in the first letter of the anticodon, which is known to be prerequisite for bovine mt tRNA(Met) to decode AUA codon as well as AUG codon. These tRNA possesses two pseudeuridines in similar positions, and only chicken tRNA(Met) had ribothymidine at the first position of the T-loop, which is always found in the usual tRNAs. Considering that AUA codon is used as five times frequently as AUG codon in these animal mitochondrial genomes, it is deduced that 5-formylcytidine at the wobble position is essential for the recognition of both AUA and AUG codons.     

The unusual methanogenic seryl-tRNA synthetase recognizes tRNASer species from all three kingdoms of life.

The methanogenic archaea Methanococcus jannaschii and M. maripaludis contain an atypical seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS), which recognizes eukaryotic and bacterial tRNAsSer, in addition to the homologous tRNASer and tRNASec species. The relative flexibility in tRNA recognition displayed by methanogenic SerRSs, shown by aminoacylation and gel mobility shift assays, indicates the conservation of some serine determinants in all three domains. The complex of M. maripaludis SerRS with the homologues tRNASer was isolated by gel filtration chromatography. Complex formation strongly depends on the conformation of tRNA. Therefore, the renaturation conditions for in vitro transcribed tRNASer(GCU) isoacceptor were studied carefully. This tRNA, unlike many other tRNAs, is prone to dimerization, possibly due to several stretches of complementary oligonucleotides within its sequence. Dimerization is facilitated by increased tRNA concentration and can be diminished by fast renaturation in the presence of 5 mm magnesium chloride.     

A unique serine-specific elongation factor Tu found in nematode mitochondria

The translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) delivers aminoacyl-tRNAs to ribosomes by recognizing the tRNA acceptor and T stems. However, the unusual truncation observed in some animal mitochondrial tRNAs seems to prevent recognition by a canonical EF-Tu. For instance, nematode mitochondria contain tRNAs lacking a T or D arm. We recently found an atypical EF-Tu (EF-Tu1) specific for nematode mitochondrial tRNAs that lack the T arm. We have now discovered a second factor, EF-Tu2, which binds only to tRNAs that lack a D arm. EF-Tu2 seems unique in its amino acid specificity because it recognizes the aminoacyl moiety of seryl-tRNAs and the tRNA structure itself. Such EF-Tu evolution might explain tRNA structural divergence in animal mitochondria.