Comparison of CA 15-3 and CEA in diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer

In order to assess the utility of the tumor-associated antigen CA15-3 in the diagnosis of breast cancer, this new tumor marker was measured pre-operatively in 1342 patients. This group comprised 509 patients with malignant disease (134 with breast cancer and 375 with other malignancies not involving the breast) and 833 patients with benign surgical diseases (95 patients with fibroadenoma of the breast, 738 with other benign diseases). The results were compared with those for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the diagnosis of breast cancer. CA15-3 was above the normal limits of 25 U/ml in 31% of the patients with breast cancer, in 22% of patients with other malignancies, and in 9% of patients with benign diseases. CEA was elevated in 26% of patients with breast cancer (greater than 3 ng/ml). CA15-3 levels were above 50 U/ml in 13% of the breast cancer patients, in 6% of patients with other malignancies, and in 0.2% of the patients with benign diseases. There was a good correlation between CA15-3 level and tumor stage in breast cancer. CA15-3 serum levels were over 50 U/ml in respectively 0%, 2%, 13%, and 73% of the patients with stages I, II, III, and IV. CA15-3 and CEA were also determined in 671 patients who had received initial curative surgery of breast cancer, and who regularly attended our follow-up clinic. CA15-3 was found to be more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrences of breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Circulating CA 15.3 levels in breast cancer. Our present experience

CA 15.3 is an antigen expressed by human breast carcinoma cells, and defined by two monoclonal antibodies, 115D8 and DF3. We used IRMA to determine the circulating serum levels of CA 15.3 in 1178 subjects with breast cancer, non-breast malignancies, benign diseases and controls. A threshold level of 40 U/ml was established with 140 healthy controls and 650 patients with benign diseases (respectively 0% subjects and 1.5% patients had abnormal antigen levels). Elevated CA 15.3 was found in 12 of 184 patients with malignancies different from breast cancer (6.5%), either epithelial carcinomas with distant metastases, mainly in the liver, or primary liver tumors. Breast cancer patients (n = 204) were analysed by prior therapy, UICC stage and WHO response to therapy. Eight of 134 (5.9%) patients with stage II or III breast cancer at presentation and no evidence of disease (NED) had elevated CA 15.3. All of 22 patients with stage IV breast cancer not responding to therapy (SD and PD) had antigen levels greater than 40 U/ml, as did 10 of 34 (29.4%) stage IV patients in objective response (CR + PR). Three of 14 pretreatment patients had abnormal marker levels, and they later proved to have distant metastases. Serum CA 15.3 values were statistically different (p less than 0.01) in NED (20.6 +/- 11.2 U/ml), CR + PR (33.5 +/- 24.0 U/ml), stable disease (98.8 +/- 50.4 U/ml) and progressive disease (greater than 200 U/ml) breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that circulating CA 15.3 antigen levels agree with the stage of breast cancer and with the response to therapy.     

Relationship of CA 125 and CA 19.9 with lung carcinoma histological subtype: preliminary study

The aim of this work was to study the possible utility of simultaneous determination of CA 125 and CA 19.9 in patients with lung cancer. Serum levels of both markers were studied in 87 patients without metastases (Mo), 72 patients with distant metastases (MT) and 15 cases without clinical evidence of disease after primary treatment (NED). Sixty-five tumors were epidermoid, 34 were adenocarcinomas, 24 were cell undifferentiated carcinomas and 51 were small-cell carcinomas. Sera from 75 healthy subjects and 20 patients with benign lung disease were used as controls. The cut-off values used were 35 and 37 U/ml for CA 125 and CA 19.9, respectively. CA 125 and CA 19.9 serum levels were within normal limits in all control patients. In NED patients these markers were not elevated, except in one with chronic liver disease who showed elevated CA 19.9 (76 U/ml). Twenty-five percent of Mo lung cancer patients and 40.3% of MT cases had CA 19.9 over 37 U/ml. Abnormally high levels of CA 125 were found in 18.7% and 22.9% of Mo and MT patients, respectively. Sixty percent of patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinoma had elevated CA 125 (mean 176 U/ml) compared to 15.4% of patients with all other histological types of tumors combined (54.3 U/ml, p less than 0.01). CA 19.9 serum levels were also more often elevated in patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinomas (50%, 7/14 cases) than in other histological types (30%, 36/120 patients), but the difference was not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preliminary study on serum levels of mucinous like cancer antigen (MCA) in patients with breast disease: comparison with CEA

MCA (mucinous-like cancer antigen) can be measured in the biological fluids of patients by means of a solid phase enzyme immunoassay. This study describes the results of MCA determination in sera of 230 patients with benign (99) and malignant (131) breast diseases. MCA levels were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in non cancer patients and in healthy subjects (p less than 0.001). MCA concentrations tended to increase as the stage of the disease advanced. The 95th percentile of MCA value distribution in normal subjects showed a diagnostic sensitivity in breast cancer patients of 16.3% at stage I, 26.2% at stages II-III and 52% at stage IV. In a group of 118 cancer patients, MCA and CEA were tested simultaneously. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MCA and CEA assays was very similar; nevertheless the association of the two tests showed 11 cases with high levels of MCA and low levels of CEA and 9 patients with high levels of CEA and low levels of MCA. Seventy-four out of 118 patients were negative for both markers and in 22 out of 118 patients markers were positive. The new marker MCA appeared to correlate with breast cancer and gave different information complementary to CEA.     

肿瘤标志物联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用

目的:探讨肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖链抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖链抗原15-3(CA15-3)联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用价值。方法:检测87例乳腺癌患者,55例乳腺良性肿瘤患者和35例健康人血清中CEA、CA19-9、CA153等肿瘤标志物的水平及3种标志物不同组合对乳腺癌的阳性检出率。结果:乳腺癌患者3种肿瘤标志物显著高于正常对照组及乳腺良性肿瘤组(P<0.01)。3项标志物不同组合对不同分期乳腺癌检出的敏感性均高于单项标志物。其中CEA+CA199+CA153组合的检出敏感性较其他组合均高,特别是对早期患者检出率明显提高。结论:CEA+CA199+CA153联合检测能提高乳腺癌的早期诊断率。     

Significance of CA72.4 in patients with colorectal cancer. Comparison with CEA and CA19.9.

CA72.4 is a new tumor-associated antigen identified by monoclonal antibodies cc49 and B72.3. Serum levels of CA72.4 were measured in patients with benign and malignant diseases. The cut-off used was 4 U/mL. CA72.4 is a highly specific marker since only 3% of 162 patients with benign diseases had elevated levels of antigen. Forty-four percent of 89 patients with colorectal cancer had elevated CA72.4 levels. Compared with CEA and CA19.9, we have found that CEA (75%) is the most sensitive marker (p less than 0.001). The simultaneous use of two or three markers did not further contribute to the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer.     

肿瘤标志物联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用

目的：探讨肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖链抗原19-9（CA19-9）、糖链抗原15-3（CA15-3）联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用价值。方法：检测87例乳腺癌患者,55例乳腺良性肿瘤患者和35例健康人血清中CEA、CA19-9、CA153等肿瘤标志物的水平及3种标志物不同组合对乳腺癌的阳性检出率。结果：乳腺癌患者3种肿瘤标志物显著高于正常对照组及乳腺良性肿瘤组（P〈0.01）。3项标志物不同组合对不同分期乳腺癌检出的敏感性均高于单项标志物。其中CEA＋CA199＋CA153组合的检出敏感性较其他组合均高,特别是对早期患者检出率明显提高。结论：CEA＋CA199＋CA153联合检测能提高乳腺癌的早期诊断率。     

Tumor markers, liver function tests and symptoms in 115 patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases

Development of the hybridoma technique has made the identification of several new tumor antigens possible. Although it was hoped that they would be more tumor-specific, none of these markers are found exclusively in tumor or in serum of tumor patients. Compared with carcinoembryionic antigen (CEA) and liver function tests, the roles of these markers (CA 19-9, CA 125, CA 15-3) were prospectively evaluated in 115 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Patients were classified according to tumor volume (T1 less than 25%, T2 25-75%, T3 greater than 75%), and the extension of infiltration (solitary/multiple/diffuse; unilateral, bilateral). Patients with benign liver or biliary disease served as a control group (n = 63). Overall sensitivity was 87% for *1, 50% for *2 and 38% for *3, with a significant correlation with tumor size. CEA serum levels were elevated in 88% of all patients. CA 19-9 was less sensitive: positive in 59%. Because of some complementary elevations, the combined use of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125 raised sensitivity to 94%. CA 19-9 and LDH could be useful for confirmation because of their higher specificity; however, the specificity of CEA rose to 93% on using a cut-off of 10 ng/ml instead of 3 ng/ml. The results indicate that CEA and CA 19-9 as well as liver function tests are helpful for preoperative staging in conjunction with imaging procedures before liver resection or regional chemotherapy.     

Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 195 (CA195) and CEA serum levels as prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer

We evaluated in 214 patients with primary colorectal cancer the prognostic value of the preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA195. For CEA these levels were above the cutoff of 6 ng/ml in 31.3% of patients, whereas for CA195 they were higher than 12 U/ml in 35.9% of patients. The simultaneous use of both antigens increased the sensitivity to 49%, which was significantly higher than that of CEA (p < 0.001) and CA195 (p < 0.01) taken singly. The mean preoperative CEA levels were significantly (p < 0.001) correlated with Dukes' stage only, while there was a significant correlation between preoperative serum levels of CA195 and Dukes' stage (p < 0.001), grade of differentiation (p < 0.01) and tumor location (p < 0.05). The results indicated that high preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA195 were associated with a shorter overall survival (p < 0.0001). In addition, separate Cox multivariate analysis showed that preoperative CA195 was, after Dukes' stage, the strongest factor to predict overall survival (p < 0.0001).     

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a comparative clinical study between CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 50

Seventy-eight patients were evaluated to ascertain the usefulness of markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer, using a less specific marker (CEA) as reference. Three groups were considered: a) 36 controls; b) 22 patients with benign obstructive jaundice; c) 20 patients with pancreatic cancer. Preoperative blood samples were obtained to ascertain CEA (E.I.A.), CA 19-9 (R.I.A.) and CA 50 (T.R.-F.I.A.). Serum concentrations of the various markers were significantly higher for patients with pancreatic cancer in comparison with the other groups, at cut-offs of 10 ng/ml (CEA), 100 ng/ml (CA 19-9) and 170 U/ml (CA 50). The sensitivity of CA 19-9 (94%) and CA 50 (88%) was much greater than that of CEA (30%). The specificity of the three markers in patients with pancreatic cancer, with respect to the control group, was 100% and this figure is reduced with respect to the group suffering from benign obstructive jaundice (CEA: 90%; CA 19-9: 88% and CA 50: 87%). Diagnostic results (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (P.P.V.) and negative predictive value (N.P.V.] did not significantly increase with respect to CA 19-9 and CA 50 when considered individually. It is concluded that the serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 50 showed high sensitivity and specificity as markers of pancreatic cancer with respect to the other groups, pointing towards clinical routine clinical use of both markers. In addition, a comparative study of the literature has been made and prospects for short-term development and concrete applications for early and reliable diagnosis have been highlighted.     

The significance of CA19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas

The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The clinical relevance of tumor marker CEA, CA 19-9 in regional chemotherapy of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma

Up to December 1986, 50 patients with documented hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma were treated with 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FUDR) using Infusaid pumps. The response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy was studied by computerized tomography (CT) and carcino-embryonal antigen (CEA), and/or CA 19-9 antigen serum assays. Preoperative CEA values were pathological in 94% of the patients but only 48% had a pathological concentration of the antigen CA 19-9 of over 37 U/ml. The course of CEA and CA 19-9 in combination with the arterial angio-CT reflected the response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy. A decrease or normalisation of CEA and CA 19-9 after the beginning of therapy is an indication of partial or complete remission of metastases (68% of the patients showed lowered CEA serum values). If the marker continues to rise in serum this is a danger signal of progression of liver metastases or of extrahepatic tumor spread if the tumor stage in the liver remains unchanged.     

The role of a new monoclonal antibody assay in the detection of recurrent breast cancer

The immunoradiometric assay "CA 15-3", recently developed to measure a breast tumor-associated antigen, gave a mean serum value of 13.8 U/ml (S.D. 6.2) for this antigen in 156 non-cancer controls (36 biopsies for a benign breast lesion and 120 healthy controls). Setting a cut-off value of 30 U/ml (specificity 99.3%), only 3 out of 58 primary breast cancer cases were positive. In metastatic breast cancer, 11 out of 33 cases with limited recurrence (33.3%) and 36 out of 56 cases with extensive recurrence (64.3%) gave abnormal values in this assay, above the cut-off point, with an overall sensitivity of 52.8%; the difference between the sensitivity values in the two groups of recurrent cases was statistically significant (P less than 0.01). According to the findings of the present study, CA 15-3 has no role in the detection of primary breast cancer, but its usefulness in disease monitoring can be hypothesized, as circulating levels of the antigen seem to be dependent on the tumor mass.     

Diagnosis of bone and liver metastases in breast cancer comparing tumor markers and imaging techniques

One hundred and forty-seven patients were examined by bone scintigraphy, ultrasonography and scintigraphic scan of the liver, at different times after surgical removal of a breast cancer, to rule out skeletal and hepatic metastases. At the same time as imaging procedures, serum levels of tumor markers (CEA, TPA and CA 15-3) were determined using radioimmunometric methods. One or more markers were elevated in all 13 patients with hepatic metastases; 9 out of 46 patients with bone metastases had all serum markers normal, with a sensitivity of 80%. Combined assay of the markers proved useful, TPA and CA 15-3 showing the best sensitivity in bone metastases, and all three markers in liver metastases.     

CEA determination in the follow-up of extracolorectal neoplasms.

CEA was initially described as a tumor and organ specific colorectal antigen, but later found by more sensitive methods in other tumors (stomach, pancreas, lung, breast) and in minor amounts in inflammatory, normal adult and fetal organs of the gastrointestinal tract. The main clinical application of CEA concerns its pretherapeutic and serial determination as circulating antigen in serum and other body fluids by means of CEA-specific, commercially available test kits. By clinical studies a significant correlation has been proven between the pretherapeutic serum CEA level and tumor stages and prognosis. Moreover, serial CEA level changes have been shown a valuable monitor following operation or during radio/chemotherapy anticipating and reflecting the clinical course of disease. In combination with newly established tumor markers, the main clinical indication for CEA determination in addition to colorectal cancer concerns monitoring of patients with stomach (+CA 72-4), lung (+NSE/SCC) and breast cancer (+CA 15-3/MCA).     

CA 15.3 and CEA plasma level monitoring in patients with breast cancer

CA 15.3 and CEA were determined in the serum of 217 patients with early and advanced breast carcinoma. CA 15.3 was high (greater than 30 U/ml) in 1/6 (17%) patients with stage I-II primary tumor, in 4/77 (5%) patients without clinical signs of disease after mastectomy, in 67/102 (65%) patients with advanced disease in progression, and in 13/32 (41%) patients with advanced disease not in progression and undergoing therapy. The corresponding incidences of pathological CEA values (greater than 2.5 ng/ml) were 33, 8, 55 and 14%. The combination of the two markers brings about a certain improvement in the sensitivity for recognising patients with advanced disease in progression (79/102 = 77%). The presence of high values of CA 15.3 is statistically correlated to the prevalent site of metastases (bone and viscera greater than soft tissues). Monitoring the two markers during antitumor therapy in 36 patients showed good accordance (56%) between CA 15.3 changes and response to therapy. The decrease of the marker in patients who achieved partial remission was statistically significant. In conclusion, CA 15.3 is more sensitive than CEA in recognising patients with advanced disease in progression and gives better accordance with the response to therapy. The simultaneous use of the two markers may be useful in the follow-up of operated patients and in monitoring the disease during treatment.     

彩色多普勒超声联合血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1对乳腺癌的诊断价值研究

摘要 目的：探究彩色多普勒超声联合血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原125（CA125）、胸苷激酶1（TK1）、三叶因子1（TFF1）对乳腺癌的诊断价值。方法：回顾性选取2019年1月到2022年1月间我院收治的97例乳腺癌患者为观察组,同期收治的97例乳腺良性病变患者为对照组,均行彩色多普勒超声检查及血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1检测,比较两组超声特征、超声参数[搏动指数（PI）、收缩期峰值流速（PSV）、阻力指数（RI）],比较两组血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1水平,通过受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析彩色多普勒超声联合血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1诊断价值及单独诊断价值。结果：与对照组比较,观察组肿块边界不清晰、内部回声不均匀、形态不规则和钙化比例明显升高（P＜0.05）。与对照组比较,观察组患者RI、PSV、PI明显升高（P＜0.05）;其中观察组血流信号分级Ⅲ级比例明显高于对照组（P＜0.05）,观察组血流信号分级0级比例明显低于对照组（P＜0.05）。与对照组比较,观察组患者血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1水平明显升高（P＜0.05）。ROC曲线发现,超声诊断乳腺癌的曲线下面积（AUC）值、灵敏度、特异度依次为0.773、76.30%、78.40%。CEA诊断乳腺癌的AUC值、灵敏度、特异度依次为0.774、78.40%、74.23%。CA125诊断乳腺癌的AUC值、灵敏度、特异度依次为0.824、77.31%、80.41%。TK1诊断乳腺癌的AUC值、灵敏度、特异度依次为0.818、78.43%、81.42%。TFF1诊断乳腺癌的AUC值、灵敏度、特异度依次为0.806、78.42%、77.31%。彩色多普勒超声联合血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1诊断乳腺癌的AUC值0.929,显著优于各项指标单独使用（P＜0.05）。结论：与各项指标单一应用相比,彩色多普勒超声联合血清CEA、CA125、TK1、TFF1诊断乳腺癌的价值较高,有助于乳腺癌的早期筛查。     

Comparison between CEA, TPA, CA 15/3 and hydroxyproline, alkaline phosphatase, whole body retention of 99mTc MDP in the follow-up of bone metastases in breast cancer

The development of bone metastases in cancer can be monitored easily using three markers: 24 h urinary hydroxyproline excretion (HOP) (an index of osteoclastic activity), serum alkaline phosphatase (Alk.Ph.) (an index of osteoblastic activity) and 24 h whole body retention of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (WBR%) (an index of bone turnover). To evaluate the effectiveness of this group of bone tumor markers in breast cancer we compared it with the following group of three markers which are commonly used in the monitoring of breast cancer and in the follow-up of advanced disease with or without bone metastases: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15/3). In 48 patients with bone metastases CEA, TPA and CA 15/3 were shown to be sensitive (79%, 85%, 90% respectively), while HOP, Alk.Ph. and WBR%, which are commonly accepted as reliable markers of bone activity, showed a lower sensitivity (67%, 46%, 75% respectively). These results may be explained by the lack of osteoclastic or osteoblastic (or both) activity at the time of diagnosis. This explanation is supported by the fact that the bone markers HOP, Alk.Ph. and WBR% were found to be more sensitive than the others in the subsequent follow-up study. We conclude that in our study, CEA, TPA and CA 15/3 are at first more sensitive than Alk.Ph., HOP and WBR% but during the follow-up Alk.Ph., HOP and WBR% are possibly both more specific and more sensitive.     

结合素-4（nectin-4）在乳腺癌中表达及其临床意义研究

目的：观察乳腺癌患者血清及乳腺组织中结合素4的表达并探讨其临床意义。方法：选择2007年6月至2008年12月哈尔滨医科大学附属三院收集的40例乳腺癌患者和20例乳腺良性肿瘤患者为研究对象,分为正常对照组、乳腺癌组、乳腺良性肿瘤组,采用Elisa法和免疫组化法对所选择的血清及组织标本中nectin-4及血清中癌胚抗原（CEA）、CA153的表达进行检测。结果：（1）nectin-4的阳性表达定位于细胞质和细胞膜,其在乳腺癌组织中的阳性表达率显著高于乳腺良性组织（P〈0．05）;nectin-4的表达与患者的年龄、临床分期无关（P〉0．05）,但与乳腺癌的病理类型、腋窝淋巴结转移与否、Her-2、ER和PR的表达均显著相关（P〈0．05）。②乳腺癌组血清nectin-4表达水平最高,为238＋4．95pg／ml;乳腺良性病变组为1205：3．28pg／ml;正常对照组为104±5．86pg／ml,三者之间比较,差别有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。③与正常对照组、乳腺良性病变组比较,乳腺癌组血清CEA、CAl53水平均明显升高,差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．01）。④nectin-4、CEA和CA153诊断乳腺癌的敏感性分别为31．67％、43-33％、28．33％,特异性分别为92．50％、95％、95％,三者联合检测诊断乳腺癌的敏感性较单独检测显著升高（P〈0．05）,可达81．67％。结论：Nectin-4在乳腺癌中高表达,且与乳腺癌的病理类型、腋窝淋巴结转移与否、Her-2、ER和PR的表达均呈显著相关,通过联合检测血清nectin-4、CEA和CA153水平可显著提高乳腺癌诊断的敏感性,有助于乳腺癌的治疗和预后评估,值得临床进一步深入研究。     

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of CA 15-3, CA 125 and sHER2 in breast cancer

Objective We investigated serum levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125, and their usefulness in the detection of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients.

Methods The levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125 tumour markers were determined in 60 patients, 40 with localized and 20 with metastatic breast carcinoma. The control group consisted of 10 healthy women.

Results We found that, at the time of diagnosis, serum levels of all three tumour markers were elevated in patients with distant metastases, but of minute importance in the detection of any breast cancer. When the data for the individual markers were combined the overall sensitivity of metastases detection with all three markers improved. In this regard, 90% of patients with distant metastases had an increase in serum level of at least one of tested tumour markers. Similar results were obtained using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Moreover, using ROC we defined cut-off values for metastasis detection for each of the tested markers.

Conclusion Our findings indicate that measurement of CA 15-3 serum values in conjunction with sHER2 and CA 15-3 can increase sensitivity in metastasis detection.