CodY orchestrates the expression of virulence determinants in emetic Bacillus cereus by impacting key regulatory circuits

Bacillus cereus causes gastrointestinal diseases and local and systemic infections elicited by the depsipeptide cereulide, enterotoxins, phospholipases, cytolysins and proteases. The PlcR‐PapR quorum sensing system activates the expression of several virulence factors, whereas the Spo0A‐AbrB regulatory circuit partially controls the plasmid‐borne cereulide synthetase (ces) operon. Here, we show that CodY, a nutrient‐responsive regulator of Gram‐positive bacteria, has a profound effect on both regulatory systems, which have been assumed to operate independently of each other. Deletion of codY resulted in downregulation of virulence genes belonging to the PlcR regulon and a concomitant upregulation of the ces genes. CodY was found to be a repressor of the ces operon, but did not interact with the promoter regions of PlcR‐dependent virulence genes in vitro, suggesting an indirect regulation of the latter. Furthermore, CodY binds to the promoter of the immune inhibitor metalloprotease InhA1, demonstrating that CodY directly links B. cereus metabolism to virulence. In vivo studies using a Galleria mellonella infection model, showed that the codY mutant was substantially attenuated, highlighting the importance of CodY as a key regulator of pathogenicity. Our results demonstrate that CodY profoundly modulates the virulence of B. cereus, possibly controlling the development of pathogenic traits in suitable host environments.     

Alternate promoters direct stress-induced transcription of the Bacillus subtilis clpC operon

clpC ofBacillus subtilis is part of an operon containing six genes. Northern blot analysis suggested that all genes are co-transcribed and encode stress-inducible proteins. Two promoters (P_A and P_B) were mapped upstream of the first gene. P_A resembles promoters recognized by the vegetative RNA polymerase Eσ^A. The other promoter (P_B) was shown to be dependent on σ^B, the general stress σ factor in B. subtilis, suggesting that clpC, a potential chaperone, is expressed in a σ^B-dependent manner. This is the first evidence that σ^B in B, subtilis is involved in controlling the expression of a gene whose counterpart, clpB, is subject to regulation by σ³² in Escherichia coli, indicating a new function of σ^B-dependent general stress proteins. P_B deviated from the consensus sequence of σ^B promoters and was only slightly induced by starvation conditions. Nevertheless, strong induction by heat, ethanol, and salt stress occurred at the σ^B-dependent promoter, whereas the vegetative promoter was only weakly induced under these conditions. However, in a sigB mutant, the σ^A-like promoter became inducible by heat and ethanol stress, completely compensating for sigB deficiency. Only the downstream σ^A-like promoter was induced by certain stress conditions such as hydrogen peroxide or puromycin. These results suggest that novel stress-induction mechanisms are acting at a vegetative promoter. Involvement of additional elements in this mode of induction are discussed.     

Spatiotemporally regulated proteolysis to dissect the role of vegetative proteins during Bacillus subtilis sporulation: cell‐specific requirement of σH and σA

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is a paradigm of bacterial development, which involves the interaction between a larger mother cell and a smaller forespore. The mother cell and the forespore activate different genetic programs, leading to the production of sporulation‐specific proteins. A critical gap in our understanding of sporulation is how vegetative proteins, made before sporulation initiation, contribute to spore formation. Here we present a system, spatiotemporally regulated proteolysis (STRP), which enables the rapid, developmentally regulated degradation of target proteins, thereby providing a suitable method to dissect the cell‐ and developmental stage‐specific role of vegetative proteins. STRP has been used to dissect the role of two major vegetative sigma factors, σ^H and σ^A, during sporulation. The results suggest that σ^H is only required in predivisional cells, where it is essential for sporulation initiation, but that it is dispensable during subsequent steps of spore formation. However, evidence has been provided that σ^A plays different roles in the mother cell, where it replenishes housekeeping functions, and in the forespore, where it plays an unexpected role in promoting spore germination and outgrowth. Altogether, the results demonstrate that STRP has the potential to provide a comprehensive molecular dissection of every stage of sporulation, germination and outgrowth.