G9α‐dependent histone H3K9me3 hypomethylation promotes overexpression of cardiomyogenesis‐related genes in foetal mice

Alcohol consumption during pregnancy can cause foetal alcohol syndrome and congenital heart disease. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanism of alcohol‐induced cardiac dysplasia remains unknown. We previously reported that alcohol exposure during pregnancy can cause abnormal expression of cardiomyogenesis‐related genes, and histone H3K9me3 hypomethylation was observed in alcohol‐treated foetal mouse heart. Hence, an imbalance in histone methylation may be involved in alcohol‐induced cardiac dysplasia. In this study, we investigated the involvement of G9α histone methyltransferase in alcohol‐induced cardiac dysplasia in vivo and in vitro using heart tissues of foetal mice and primary cardiomyocytes of neonatal mice. Western blotting revealed that alcohol caused histone H3K9me3 hypomethylation by altering G9α histone methyltransferase expression in cardiomyocytes. Moreover, overexpression of cardiomyogenesis‐related genes (MEF2C, Cx43, ANP and β‐MHC) was observed in alcohol‐exposed foetal mouse heart. Additionally, we demonstrated that G9α histone methyltransferase directly interacted with histone H3K9me3 and altered its methylation. Notably, alcohol did not down‐regulate H3K9me3 methylation after G9α suppression by short hairpin RNA in primary mouse cardiomyocytes, preventing MEF2C, Cx43, ANP and β‐MHC overexpression. These findings suggest that G9α histone methyltransferase‐mediated imbalance in histone H3K9me3 methylation plays a critical role in alcohol‐induced abnormal expression cardiomyogenesis‐related genes during pregnancy. Therefore, G9α histone methyltransferase may be an intervention target for congenital heart disease.     

Shoring up DNA methylation and H3K27me3 domain demarcation at developmental genes

Mutual antagonism between DNA methylation and H3K27me3 histone methylation suggests a dynamic crosstalk between these epigenetic marks that could help ensure correct gene expression programmes. Work from Manzo et al ( 2017 ) now shows that an isoform of de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A provides specificity in the system by depositing DNA methylation at adjacent “shores” of hypomethylated bivalent CpG islands (CGI) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). DNMT3A1‐directed methylation appears to be instructive in maintaining the H3K27me3 profile at the hypomethylated bivalent CGI promoters of developmentally important genes.     

The essential role of histone H3 Lys9 di-methylation and MeCP2 binding in MGMT silencing with poor DNA methylation of the promoter CpG island

Silencing of the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, a key to DNA repair, is involved in carcinogenesis. Recent studies have focused on DNA hypermethylation of the promoter CpG island. However, cases showing silencing with DNA hypomethylation certainly exist, and the mechanism involved is not elucidated. To clarify this mechanism, we examined the dynamics of DNA methylation, histone acetylation, histone methylation, and binding of methyl-CpG binding proteins at the MGMT promoter region using four MGMT negative cell lines with various extents of DNA methylation. Histone H3K9 di-methylation (H3me2K9), not tri-methylation, and MeCP2 binding were commonly seen in all MGMT negative cell lines regardless of DNA methylation status. 5Aza-dC, but not TSA, restored gene expression, accompanied by a decrease in H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding. In SaOS2 cells with the most hypomethylated CpG island, 5Aza-dC decreased H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding with no effect on DNA methylation or histone acetylation. H3me2K9 and DNA methylation were restricted to in and around the island, indicating that epigenetic modification at the promoter CpG island is critical. We conclude that H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding are common and more essential for MGMT silencing than DNA hypermethylation or histone deacetylation. The epigenetic mechanism leading to silent heterochromatin at the promoter CpG island may be the same in different types of cancer irrespective of the extent of DNA methylation.     

Molecular recognition of H3/H4 histone tails by the tudor domains of JMJD2A: a comparative molecular dynamics simulations study

Background

Histone demethylase, JMJD2A, specifically recognizes and binds to methylated lysine residues at histone H3 and H4 tails (especially trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me3), trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3) and di,trimethylated H4K20 (H4K20me2, H4K20me3)) via its tandem tudor domains. Crystal structures of JMJD2A-tudor binding to H3K4me3 and H4K20me3 peptides are available whereas the others are not. Complete picture of the recognition of the four histone peptides by the tandem tudor domains yet remains to be clarified.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We report a detailed molecular dynamics simulation and binding energy analysis of the recognition of JMJD2A-tudor with four different histone tails. 25 ns fully unrestrained molecular dynamics simulations are carried out for each of the bound and free structures. We investigate the important hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions between the tudor domains and the peptide molecules and identify the critical residues that stabilize the complexes. Our binding free energy calculations show that H4K20me2 and H3K9me3 peptides have the highest and lowest affinity to JMJD2A-tudor, respectively. We also show that H4K20me2 peptide adopts the same binding mode with H4K20me3 peptide, and H3K9me3 peptide adopts the same binding mode with H3K4me3 peptide. Decomposition of the enthalpic and the entropic contributions to the binding free energies indicate that the recognition of the histone peptides is mainly driven by favourable van der Waals interactions. Residue decomposition of the binding free energies with backbone and side chain contributions as well as their energetic constituents identify the hotspots in the binding interface of the structures.

Conclusion

Energetic investigations of the four complexes suggest that many of the residues involved in the interactions are common. However, we found two receptor residues that were related to selective binding of the H3 and H4 ligands. Modifications or mutations on one of these residues can selectively alter the recognition of the H3 tails or the H4 tails.     

Holocarboxylase synthetase synergizes with methyl CpG binding protein 2 and DNA methyltransferase 1 in the transcriptional repression of long-terminal repeats

Holocarboxylase synthetase (HLCS) is a chromatin protein that facilitates the creation of histone H3 lysine 9-methylation (H3K9me) gene repression marks through physical interactions with the histone methyltransferase EHMT-1. HLCS knockdown causes a depletion of H3K9me marks in mammalian cell cultures and severe phenotypes such as short lifespan and low stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. HLCS displays a punctuate distribution pattern in chromatin despite lacking a strong DNA-binding domain. Previous studies suggest that the binding of HLCS to chromatin depends on DNA methylation. We tested the hypothesis that HLCS interacts physically with the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 and the methyl CpG binding protein MeCP2 to facilitate the binding of HLCS to chromatin, and that these interactions contribute toward the repression of long-terminal repeats (LTRs) by H3K9me marks. Co-immunoprecipitation and limited proteolysis assays provided evidence suggesting that HLCS interacts physically with both DNMT1 and MeCP2. The abundance of H3K9me marks was 207% greater in the LTR15 locus in HLCS overexpression human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells compared with controls. This gain in H3K9me was inversely linked with a 87% decrease in mRNA coding for LTRs. Effects of HLCS abundance on LTR expression were abolished when DNA methylation marks were erased by treating cells with 5-azacytidine. We conclude that interactions between DNA methylation and HLCS are crucial for mediating gene repression by H3K9me, thereby providing evidence for epigenetic synergies between the protein biotin ligase HLCS and dietary methyl donors.     

RNAi-independent de novo DNA methylation revealed in Arabidopsis mutants of chromatin remodeling gene DDM1

Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me) and small RNAs are associated with constitutively silent chromatin in diverse eukaryotes including plants. In plants, silent transposons are also marked by cytosine methylation, especially at non‐CpG sites. Transposon‐specific non‐CpG methylation in plants is controlled by small RNAs and H3K9me. Although it is often assumed that small RNA directs H3K9me, interaction between small RNA and H3K9me has not been directly demonstrated in plants. We have previously shown that a mutation in the chromatin remodeling gene DDM1 (DECREASE IN DNA METHYLATION 1) induces a global decrease but a local increase of cytosine methylation and accumulation of small RNA at a locus called BONSAI. Here we show that de novo BONSAI methylation does not depend on RNAi but does depend on H3K9me. In mutants of H3K9 methyltransferase gene KRYPTONITE or the H3K9me‐dependent DNA methyltransferase gene CHROMOMETHYALSE3, the ddm1‐induced de novo cytosine methylation was abolished for all three contexts (CpG, CpHpG and CpHpH). Furthermore, RNAi mutants showed strong developmental defects when combined with the ddm1 mutation. Our results revealed unexpected interactions of epigenetic modifications that may be conserved among diverse eukaryotes.     

The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1‐containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39‐mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin

Trimethylation of lysine 9 in histone H3 (H3K9me3) enrichment is a characteristic of pericentric heterochromatin. The hypothesis of a stepwise mechanism to establish and maintain this mark during DNA replication suggests that newly synthesized histone H3 goes through an intermediate methylation state to become a substrate for the histone methyltransferase Suppressor of variegation 39 (Suv39H1/H2). How this intermediate methylation state is achieved and how it is targeted to the correct place at the right time is not yet known. Here, we show that the histone H3K9 methyltransferase SetDB1 associates with the specific heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α)–chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF1) chaperone complex. This complex monomethylates K9 on non‐nucleosomal histone H3. Therefore, the heterochromatic HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1 complex probably provides H3K9me1 for subsequent trimethylation by Suv39H1/H2 in pericentric regions. The connection of CAF1 with DNA replication, HP1α with heterochromatin formation and SetDB1 for H3K9me1 suggests a highly coordinated mechanism to ensure the propagation of H3K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin during DNA replication.     

Dual histone H3 methylation marks at lysines 9 and 27 required for interaction with CHROMOMETHYLASE3

Both DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications contribute to gene silencing, but the mechanistic relationship between these epigenetic marks is unclear. Mutations in two Arabidopsis genes, the KRYPTONITE (KYP) histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase and the CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3) DNA methyltransferase, cause a reduction of CNG DNA methylation, suggesting that H3K9 methylation controls CNG DNA methylation. Here we show that the chromodomain of CMT3 can directly interact with the N-terminal tail of histone H3, but only when it is simultaneously methylated at both the H3K9 and H3K27 positions. Furthermore, using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis and immunohistolocalization experiments, we found that H3K27 methylation colocalizes with H3K9 methylation at CMT3-controlled loci. The H3K27 methylation present at heterochromatin was not affected by mutations in KYP or in several Arabidopsis PcG related genes including the Enhancer of Zeste homologs, suggesting that a novel pathway controls heterochromatic H3K27 methylation. Our results suggest a model in which H3K9 methylation by KYP, and H3K27 methylation by an unknown enzyme provide a combinatorial histone code for the recruitment of CMT3 to silent loci.