Specific silver staining of experimentally undercondensed chromosome regions

Treatment of human and mouse cell cultures with DNA binding AT-specific compounds and with some base analogues induced distinct undercondensations in several heterochromatic chromosome regions. All those heterochromatic regions undercondensed by AT-specific DNA ligands (distamycin A, DAPI, Hoechst 33258) could be heavily labeled with the silver(Ag)-staining technique; but the heterochromatic regions undercondensed with the cytidine analogue 5-azacytidine were Ag-negative. In metaphase chromosomes from BrdU-treated human cell cultures, the bifilarly substituted chromatids, which show a slight undercondensation, were also Ag-negative. Cytochemical analyses of the Ag-stained undercondensed heterochromatic regions showed that the Ag-stainable material consisted of nonhistone proteins. The mechanism of Ag staining in the undercondensed heterochromatic regions was compared with Ag staining of the nucleolus organizer regions.     

Kinetochore development in two dicentric chromosomes in man

Summary Two dicentric human chromosomes were investigated with light and electron microscopic techniques. One chromosome, with a translocation tdic(5;13)(p12;p12), behaved as a dicentric in about half the cells: it had two primary constrictions; C- and Cd-banding showed two centromeres; and the CREST antikinetochore antibody reacted with the two centromeres with equal affinity. Electron microscopic analysis of sectioned metaphases showed that the dicentric could develop kinetochores at both centromeres simultaneously. The other dicentric chromosome, tdic(21;21)(q22;q22), occasionally showed two primary constrictions, but both C-and Cd-banding distinguished between an active and an inactive centromere, and the CREST antibody reacted only weakly with the inactive centromere. Electron microscopy showed kinetochore development at only one centromere.     

Kinetochore microtubule numbers of different sized chromosomes

For three species of grasshoppers the volumes of the largest and the smallest metaphase chromosome differ by a factor of 10, but the microtubules (MTs) attached to the individual kinetochores show no corresponding range in numbers. Locusta mitotic metaphase chromosomes range from 2 to 21 μm, and the average number of MTs per kinetochore is 21 with an SD of 4.6. Locusta meiotic bivalents at late metaphase I range from 4 to 40 μm(3), and the kinetochore regions (= two sister kinetochores facing the same spindle pole) have an average of 25 kinetochore microtubules (kMTs) with an SD of 4.9. Anaphase velocities are the same at mitosis and meiosis I. The smaller mitotic metaphase chromosomes of neopodismopsis are similar in size, 6 to 45 μm(3), to Locusta, but they have an average more kMTs, 33, SD = 9.2. The four large Robertsonian fusion chromosomes of neopodismopsis have an average of 67 MTs per kinetochore, the large number possibly the result of a permanent dicentric condition. Chloealtis has three pairs of Robertsonian fusion chromosomes which, at late meiotic metaphase I, form bivalents of 116, 134, and 152 μm (3) with an average of 67 MTs per kinetochore similar to Locusta bivalents, but with a much higher average of 42 MTs per kinetochore region. It is speculated that, in addition to mechanical demands of force, load, and viscosity, the kMT numbers are governed by cell type and evolutionary history of the karyotype in these grasshoppers.     

Chromomeres and puffing in experimentally induced polytene chromosomes ofCalliphora erythrocephala

In the most advanced types of meroistic ovaries the synthesis of RNA for the growing oocyte in each follicle is taken over by nurse cells, i.e., sister cells of the definite egg cell. InCalliphora, the highly polyploid nurse cells (NC) develop a polytene karyotype under conditions of strict brother-sister inbreeding and using a controlled selection technique. A comparison of the polytene NC-chromosomes with those from the pupal bristle forming cells reveals an unexpected discrepancy: while both chromosome complements exhibit a constant banding pattern it is not possible to homologize the two tissue specific patterns by identifying homologous band-sequences. Puffing in NC likewise turns out to be unusual in its extent as well as in that it remains constant during long periods of oogenesis. In a more detailed discussion an interpretation and evaluation of these findings will be attempted.To the memory of Karl Bier     

The Kinetochore

A critical requirement for mitosis is the distribution of genetic material to the two daughter cells. The central player in this process is the macromolecular kinetochore structure, which binds to both chromosomal DNA and spindle microtubule polymers to direct chromosome alignment and segregation. This review will discuss the key kinetochore activities required for mitotic chromosome segregation, including the recognition of a specific site on each chromosome, kinetochore assembly and the formation of kinetochore–microtubule connections, the generation of force to drive chromosome segregation, and the regulation of kinetochore function to ensure that chromosome segregation occurs with high fidelity.A key objective for cell division is to physically distribute the genomic material to the two new daughter cells. Achieving proper chromosome segregation requires three primary things (Fig. 1): (1) the ability to specifically recognize and detect each unit of DNA; (2) a physical connection between the DNA and other cellular structures to mediate their distribution; and (3) a force-generating mechanism to drive the spatial movement of the DNA to the daughter cells. Although this article focuses on how these processes are achieved during mitosis in eukaryotic cells, these key principles are required for DNA segregation in all organisms, including bacteria. Perhaps the simplest DNA distribution machine is the partitioning system that segregates the small, circular bacterial R1 plasmid (Fig. 1). The R1 partitioning system uses just a single component for each of the three key activities listed above (reviewed in Salje et al. 2010). First, a 160-bp sequence-specific DNA element termed parC allows the partitioning system to recognize a specific region of the plasmid. Second, the DNA-binding protein ParR associates with the parC DNA sequence. ParR can then mediate connections between the plasmid DNA and third factor—the filament forming protein ParM. ParM polymerization is capable of generating force to drive the separation of two replicated copies of the R1 plasmid. The R1 plasmid partitioning system is both simple and elegant, and it demonstrates that it is possible to achieve DNA segregation with only two proteins and a short DNA sequence.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Core requirements for DNA segregation. Cartoon diagram showing the core activities required for DNA segregation of the bacterial R1 plasmid or eukaryotic chromosomes highlighting the recognition of DNA, physical connections, and force.In striking contrast to the R1 plasmid partitioning system, chromosome segregation in eukaryotes (Fig. 1) requires hundreds of different proteins. Given the ability of the simple R1 partitioning system to efficiently mediate DNA segregation in bacteria, it raises the question of why this added complexity is present in eukaryotes. Importantly, there are significant limitations to the bacterial system that would prevent such a system from working in eukaryotes. For example, bacteria are ∼1–2-µm long, whereas vertebrate cells can be ∼10–50 µm in diameter creating a larger spatial requirement to move the DNA (Fig. 1). In addition, although only a single R1 plasmid is present in each bacterium, human cells have 46 different units of DNA (23 from each parent), which are packaged into chromosomes. Each chromosome must be distributed properly during every cell division. Independently recognizing each of these units to ensure their accurate distribution represents a complex challenge. Indeed, adding even one additional R1 plasmid causes the system to break down, with ParM polymers acting indefinitely, pushing the two most closely positioned units of DNA apart to opposite ends of a cell (Campbell and Mullins 2007). Finally, eukaryotic cells require that chromosome segregation occur with high fidelity to ensure that the two replicated units of DNA are distributed accurately to the two new daughter cells. Even a single chromosome mis-segregation event in a multicellular organism has the potential to lead to lethality, lead to developmental disorders, or contribute to cancer progression (Holland and Cleveland 2009; Gordon et al. 2012), placing a high premium on the accuracy of this process.Despite the differences in complexity between bacterial plasmid partitioning systems and the eukaryotic chromosome segregation machinery, the fundamental requirements for distributing DNA to two new cells are remarkably similar (Fig. 1). First, it is necessary to have a region of each chromosome that is “recognized” by the chromosome segregation machinery. In eukaryotes, this region of DNA is termed the centromere. Second, a group of proteins must assemble on this DNA element to facilitate its “connections” to other structures in the cell. In eukaryotes, this physical connection is provided by a macromolecular structure termed the kinetochore. The kinetochore is an impressive molecular machine that requires the coordinated functions of more than 100 different protein components (Cheeseman and Desai 2008). Third, the kinetochore must interact with additional structures that provide the “force” to move the chromosomes. Chromosome segregation in eukaryotes requires microtubule polymers that generate force primarily through their depolymerization.In this review, I will discuss the molecular mechanisms that underlie kinetochore function, including the recognition of a specific site on each chromosome, the formation of the physical kinetochore–microtubule connections, and the forces that drive chromosome segregation during mitosis in eukaryotes, as well as the mechanisms that regulate kinetochore function.     

Kinetochore fiber formation in animal somatic cells: dueling mechanisms come to a draw

The attachment to and movement of a chromosome on the mitotic spindle are mediated by the formation of a bundle of microtubules (MTs) that tethers the kinetochore on the chromosome to a spindle pole. The origin of these “kinetochore fibers” (K fibers) has been investigated for over 125 years. As noted in 1944 by Schrader [Mitosis, Columbia University Press, New York, 110 pp.], there are three possible ways to form a K fiber: (a) it grows from the pole until it contacts the kinetochore, (b) it grows directly from the kinetochore, or (c) it forms as a result of an interaction between the pole and the chromosome. Since Schrader's time, it has been firmly established that K fibers in centrosome-containing animal somatic cells form as kinetochores capture MTs growing from the spindle pole (route a). It is now similarly clear that in cells lacking centrosomes, including higher plants and many animal oocytes, K fibers “self-assemble” from MTs generated by the chromosomes (route b). Can animal somatic cells form K fibers in the absence of centrosomes by the “self-assembly” pathway? In 2000, the answer to this question was shown to be a resounding “yes.” With this result, the next question became whether the presence of a centrosome normally suppresses K fiber self-assembly or if this route works concurrently with centrosome-mediated K-fiber formation. This question, too, has recently been answered: observations on untreated live animal cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin clearly show that kinetochores can nucleate the formation of their associated MTs in a unique manner in the presence of functional centrosomes. The concurrent operation of these two “dueling” routes for forming K fibers in animal cells helps explain why the attachment of kinetochores and the maturation of K fibers occur as quickly as they do on all chromosomes within a cell.     

C- and Q-chromatin of the experimentally condensed human interphase chromosomes]

Condensed interphase chromosomes of the cultured human lymphocytes obtained by the fusion of interphase and metaphase cells were studied using C- and Q-bands techniques. The appearance and localization of the constitutive heterochromatin blocks on condensed chromosomes at G1-period were the same as on the metaphase ones. These characters were used for a group and individual identification of some chromosomes condensed at G1-period and for a study of the association of the constitutive heterochromatin blocks in the interphase nuclei. The fluorescent analysis of the chromosomes condensed at G1-period detected some bright fluorescent blocks of the constitutive heterochromatin.     

Kinetochore orientation in mitosis and meiosis

Kinetochores are the major point of contact between spindle microtubules and chromosomes. They are assemblies of more than 50 different proteins and take part in regulating and controlling their own interaction with the spindle. We review recent advance in understanding how kinetochores are properly placed onto the chromosome, and how their interaction with the microtubules of the spindle is regulated. Kinetochore orientation in meiosis I shows some particular features, and we also discuss similarities and differences between mitosis and meiosis I.     

Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells.

We have analyzed the fine structure of 10 chromosomal fibers from mitotic spindles of PtK1 cells in metaphase and anaphase, using electron microscopy of serial thin sections and computer image processing to follow the trajectories of the component microtubules (MTs) in three dimensions. Most of the kinetochore MTs ran from their kinetochore to the vicinity of the pole, retaining a clustered arrangement over their entire length. This MT bundle was invaded by large numbers of other MTs that were not associated with kinetochores. The invading MTs frequently came close to the kinetochore MTs, but a two-dimensional analysis of neighbor density failed to identify any characteristic spacing between the two MT classes. Unlike the results from neighbor density analyses of interzone MTs, the distributions of spacings between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs revealed no evidence for strong MT-MT interactions. A three-dimensional analysis of distances of closest approach between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs has, however, shown that the most common distances of closest approach were 30-50 nm, suggesting a weak interaction between kinetochore MTs and their neighbors. The data support the ideas that kinetochore MTs form a mechanical connection between the kinetochore and the pericentriolar material that defines the pole, but that the mechanical interactions between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs are weak.     

Kinetochore structure and function

The vertebrate kinetochore is a complex structure that specifies the attachments between the chromosomes and microtubules of the spindle and is thus essential for accurate chromosome segregation. Kinetochores are assembled on centromeric chromatin through complex pathways that are coordinated with the cell cycle. In the light of recent discoveries on how proteins assemble onto kinetochores and interact with each other, we review these findings in this article (which is part of the Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy series), and discuss their implications for the current mitotic checkpoint models - the template model and the two-step model. The template model proposes that Mad1-Mad2 at kinetochores acts as a template to change the conformation of another binding molecule of Mad2. This templated change in conformation is postulated as a mechanism for the amplification of the 'anaphase wait' signal. The two-step model proposes that the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) is the kinetochore-independent anaphase inhibitor, and the role of the unaligned kinetochore is to sensitize the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) to MCC-mediated inhibition.     

Sequence of puff formation inRhynchosciara polytene chromosomes

The chief characteristics of the life cycle ofRhynchosciara sp. are: egg stage (12 days); three larval instars of approximately 6 days each, followed by a 4th instar of approximately 40 days duration; pupation (6 days); and adult form (5–6 days). Maps of the 4 polytene chromosomes ofRhynchosciara sp. have been prepared, and the temporal sequence of puff formation on the chromosomes described. The cocoon is synthesized during the prepupal period, and at this time major puffs are seen on all chromosomes. The largest and most numerous puffs occur on the salivary gland chromosomes during the 24 hours prior to the last or prepupal molt. Three of the puffs that occur at this time are DNA-puffs (Summary see p. 249). Research sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corporation.     

Ring chromosomes: from formation to clinical potential

Ring chromosomes (RCs) are circular DNA molecules, which occur rarely in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Lilian Vaughan Morgan first described them in the fruit fly. Human embryos very seldom have RCs, about 1:50,000. Carriers of RCs may have varying degrees of symptoms, from healthy phenotype to serious pathologies in physical and intellectual development. Many authors describe common symptoms of RC presence: short stature and some developmental delay that could be described as a “ring chromosome syndrome.” As a rule, RCs arise de novo through the end-joining of two DNA double-strand breaks, telomere-subtelomere junction, or inv dup del rearrangement in both meiosis and mitosis. There are family cases of RC inheritance. The presence of RCs causes numerous secondary chromosome rearrangements in vivo and in vitro. RCs can change their size, become lost, or increase their copy number and cause additional deletions, duplication, and translocations, affecting both RCs and other chromosomes. In this review, we examine RC inheritance, instability, mechanisms of formation, and potential clinical applications of artificially created RCs for large-scale chromosome rearrangement treatment.     

Efficiency of de novo centromere formation in human artificial chromosomes

In a comparative study, we show that human artificial chromosome (HAC) vectors based on alpha-satellite (alphoid) DNA from chromosome 17 but not the Y chromosome regularly form HACs in HT1080 human cells. We constructed four structurally similar HAC vectors, two with chromosome 17 or Y alphoid DNA (17alpha, Yalpha) and two with 17alpha or Yalpha and the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase locus (HPRT1). The 17alpha HAC vectors generated artificial minichromosomes in 32-79% of the HT1080 clones screened, compared with only approximately 4% for the Yalpha HAC vectors, indicating that Yalpha is inefficient at forming a de novo centromere. The 17alpha HAC vectors produced megabase-sized, circular HACs containing multiple copies of alphoid fragments (60-250 kb) interspersed with either vector or HPRT1 DNA.The 17alpha-HPRT1 HACs were less stable than those with 17alpha only, and these results may influence the design of new HAC gene transfer vectors.     

Factors influencing Giemsa band formation of human chromosomes

Summary Factors influencing a Giemsa banding method in which slides are treated with NaOH and then incubated in phosphate buffer were investigated. The study indicated that the removal of chromosomal proteins during fixation in acetic methanol is important for band formation. When fixatives containing formalin were used no banding occurred. Histones do not appear to be involved in band formation as neither of the two histone staining methods tested gave banding patterns. The age of the slide preparations was important, the best banding occurring on slides a week old. Romanovsky stains were the only stains to give banding, other stains resulted in distorted chromosomes. The composition of the incubation buffer had little effect on the quality of the banding. However liquid scintillation analysis of the phosphate buffer in which ³H-thymidine labelled preparations had been treated, revealed that thymidine is removed during incubation in buffer, and suggests that the degradation of thymidine is an important factor in band formation.This work was supported by the W. H. Travis Trust and the Canterbury and Westland Division of the Cancer Society of New Zealand.     

Ran-GTP regulates Kinetochore Attachment in Somatic Cells

The Ran GTPase controls multiple mitotic processes in Xenopus egg extracts, including mitotic checkpoints, spindle assembly and post-mitotic nuclear envelope reassembly. We have analyzed Ran’s role in somatic cells. We uncovered a novel mitotic role of Ran-GTP, involving the Crm1 nuclear export receptor. This pathway is an important mode of Ran-GTP function during mitosis in mammalian somatic cells, whichmediates the recruitment of the RanGAP1/RanBP2 complex to kinetochores and maintains the microtubule-based fibers connecting kinetochores to spindle poles (kfibers). Here we discuss potential implications of these findings for normal k-fiber assembly.     

Shugoshin 1 Plays a Central Role in Kinetochore Assembly and is Required for Kinetochore Targeting of Plk1

Physical connection between the sister chromatids is mediated by the cohesin protein complex. During prophase, cohesin is removed from the chromosome arms while the centromeres remain united. Shugoshin1 (Sgo1) is required for maintenance of centromeric cohesion from prophase to the metaphase-anaphase transition. Furthermore, Sgo1 has been proposed to regulate kinetochore microtubule stability and sense interkinetochore tension, two tasks which are tightly coupled with the function of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) and Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Here we show that depletion or chemical inhibition of Aurora B kinase (AurB), the catalytic subunit of the CPC, disrupts accumulation of Sgo1 on the kinetochores in HeLa cells and causes Sgo1 to localize on the chromosome arms. RNAi assays show that depletion of Sgo1 did not affect AurB localization but diminished Plk1 kinetochore binding. Furthermore, we demonstrate that vertebrate Sgo1 is phosphorylated by both AurB and Plk1 in vitro. The data presented here includes an extensive analysis of kinetochore targeting interdependencies of mitotic proteins that propose a novel branch in kinetochore assembly where Sgo1 and Plk1 have central roles. Furthermore our studies implicate Sgo1 in the tension sensing mechanism of the spindle checkpoint by regulating Plk1 kinetochore affinity.