Feeding preferences in 2 disjunct populations of tiger snakes, Notechis scutatus (Elapidae)

Variations at both the genetic and phenotypic levels play animportant role in responses to food and food-related stimuli.Knowledge of such variations is crucial to understanding howpopulations adapt to changing environments. We investigatedthe dietary preferences of 2 tiger snake populations and comparedthe responses of diet-naive animals (laboratory-born neonates),diet-controlled animals (laboratory-reared juveniles), and naturaldiet–experienced animals (wild-caught adults) to visualand chemical cues from 6 prey types (mouse, skink, silver gull,chicken, shearwater, and frog). The mainland population inhabitsa swamp, feeds mostly on frogs, and suffers heavy predation.The second population inhabits a small nearby offshore islandwith no standing water (no frogs); feeds mostly on skinks, mice,and, as adults, silver gull chicks; and suffers no known predation.Although different prey are eaten in the 2 populations, adultwild-caught snakes from both populations showed a significantpreference for 3 types of prey (frog, mouse, and chick), irrespectiveof their natural diet. Neonates responded to all prey cues morethan they did to control stimuli in both populations. However,the island neonates showed significantly higher interest insilver gull chick stimuli (the main prey of the island adultsnakes) than did their mainland conspecifics. Laboratory-bredjuveniles displayed behavioral plasticity by significantly increasingtheir response to mice after being fed baby mice for 7 months.We conclude that genetic-based differences in food-related cuesare important in tiger snakes but that they are also capableof behavioral plasticity. Island adult and neonate snakes exhibitedresponses to prey types no longer consumed naturally (frog),suggesting that behavioral characters may have been retainedfor long periods under relaxed selection. Island neonates showeda strong interest in a novel prey item (silver gull). This resultcomplements previous work describing how island snakes havedeveloped the ability to swallow larger prey than usual, aswell as seemingly developing a taste for them.     

Apparent decoupling of prey recognition ability with prey availability in an insular snake population

Numerous studies on the feeding behavior of snakes have reported the consistency of tongue-flick responses with their natural diets. For representatives of widely distributed, dietary generalist species from particular localities, we can expect that their tongue-flick responses to potential prey unavailable in their original habitats have been reduced whereas those to prey common in the habitats have been enhanced. To test this hypothesis, intraspecific variation in tongue-flick responses to prey chemicals was examined using ingestively naive snakes (Elaphe quadrivirgata) from dietarily different populations: populations from the main Japanese island, where the snakes' diet predominantly consists of sympatric frogs, and from Mikura-jima Island, where no frogs occur and the snakes thus chiefly prey on lizards. We presented chemical stimuli from six items including those from their natural and potential prey (fish, frog, lizard, mouse, water, and cologne) to newborn snakes. Significant effects of stimuli on the tongue-flick responses were detected. On the other hand, effects of population and interaction between stimuli and population were not significant, and individual comparisons revealed no significant interlocality differences in responses to either frog or lizard chemicals. Thus, our hypothesis was not supported. However, in the Mikura-jima sample, significantly fewer snakes responded to frog chemicals than in the main island sample. The significance of the inconsistency between prey recognition ability and prey availability in the Mikura-jima population are discussed. Received: October 17, 2000 / Accepted: December 14, 2000     

Duration of strike-induced chemosensory searching in long-term captive rattlesnakes at national zoo,audubon zoo,and San Diego Zoo

Rattlesnakes typically strike and release adult rodent prey. Striking is followed by a sustained, high rate of tongue flicking that guides the snake to the envenomated, dead prey. Wild-caught rattlesnakes exhibited this chemosensory searching for about 2.5 h, and the present study demonstrated that long-term captive rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox, C durissus, C horridus, C vegrandis, C unicolor) at three zoos did the same. Because these zoo-raised snakes had always been offered dead rodents and because the snakes had become accustomed to ingesting them without striking, the present snakes had rarely exercised their innate predatory repertoires. The duration of chemosensory searching in these snakes indicates that this important aspect of the predatory repertoire had not been degraded as a consequence of long-term captive husbandry.     

Strike-induced chemosensory searching in old world vipers and new world pit vipers at San Diego Zoo

Rattlesnakes (Crotalus unicolor, C vegrandis) and Russell's vipers (Vipera russelli) at San Diego Zoo exhibited sustained high rates of tongue flicking after striking mice (Mus musculus) but not after seeing, smelling, and/or detecting thermal cues arising from mice. Called strike-induced chemosensory searching (SICS), this phenomenon contributes to poststrike trailing of envenomated prey. Because these zoo-raised snakes had always been offered dead rodents, and because these prey were usually ingested without first being struck, the present snakes had rarely exercised their innate predatory repertoire (ie, ambush tactics including striking, releasing, and trailing). Indeed, most specimens had never before struck a mouse and, hence, had never exhibited SICS. The occurrence of SICS in the present study clearly indicates that this important aspect of the predatory repertoire had not been degraded as a consequence of long-term captive husbandry.     

Rattlesnake predatory behaviour: Mediation of prey discrimination and release of swallowing by cues arising from envenomated mice

Responses of rattlesnakes to envenomated mice were examined in five experiments. In experiment 1 rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus terrificus and C. viridis viridis) discriminated mice that they had envenomated, as indexed by number of tongue flicks and accumulated investigation time, when these prey items were paired with control mice killed by the experimenter. Experiment 2 demonstrated that rattlesnakes also exhibited this discrimination when presented with mice envenomated by a conspecific and controls killed by the experimenter. In experiments 1 and 2, we observed that rattlesnakes delivered a large number of tongue flicks to exudates associated with nasal-oral tissues of envenomated mice. It has commonly been noted that rattlesnakes typically swallow envenomated, dead mice head first. In experiment 3 this observation was statistically verified. Evidence obtained in experiment 4 indicated that nasal-oral tissues of envenomated, dead mice were discriminated from anogenital tissues by rattlesnakes. Cues arising from the nasal-oral tissues probably (1) assisted the snakes in locating the head-end of the rodent, and (2) released the swallowing modal-action pattern, the final phase of the predatory sequence. In experiment 5, rattlesnakes exhibited no discrimination between nasal-oral and anogenital tissues of non-envenomated, dead mice, indicating that the results of experiment 4 were probably dependent upon effects of envenomation.     

The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders

Models of population dynamics that include interference competitionhave often been applied to foraging waders and less so to otherforagers, even though these models are, in principle, generallyapplicable. At present, however, it is still unclear whetherinterference competition is of importance for foraging waders.To support this idea experimental evidence and knowledge ofthe mechanisms underlying interference effects are required.We experimentally determined the relationship between foragerdensity and foraging success in two wader species: the red knot(Calidris canutus) and the ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres).With each of the two species, we conducted an experiment consistingof 300 one-min trials. In these trials we scored the behaviorand the foraging success of focal individuals at specific combinationsof bird and prey density. Irrespective of prey density, individualsof both species discovered fewer prey items at higher bird densities.Despite this, only in turnstones did intake rates decline withincreasing bird density. Knots compensated for a lower prey-discoveryrate by rejecting fewer prey items at higher bird densities.In knots, bird density had a complex, nonmonotonic effect onthe time spent vigilant and searching. In turnstones the maineffect of increased bird density was a reduction in the prey-encounterrate, that is, the reward per unit search time. Effects on thetime spent vigilant and the time spent searching were less pronouncedthan in knots. Thus, the mechanistic basis of the effects ofbird density was complex for each of the two species and differedbetween them.     

Rapid and repeated origin of insular gigantism and dwarfism in Australian tiger snakes

It is a well-known phenomenon that islands can support populations of gigantic or dwarf forms of mainland conspecifics, but the variety of explanatory hypotheses for this phenomenon have been difficult to disentangle. The highly venomous Australian tiger snakes (genus Notechis) represent a well-known and extreme example of insular body size variation. They are of special interest because there are multiple populations of dwarfs and giants and the age of the islands and thus the age of the tiger snake populations are known from detailed sea level studies. Most are 5000-7000 years old and all are less than 10,000 years old. Here we discriminate between two competing hypotheses with a molecular phylogeography dataset comprising approximately 4800 bp of mtDNA and demonstrate that populations of island dwarfs and giants have evolved five times independently. In each case the closest relatives of the giant or dwarf populations are mainland tiger snakes, and in four of the five cases, the closest relatives are also the most geographically proximate mainland tiger snakes. Moreover, these body size shifts have evolved extremely rapidly and this is reflected in the genetic divergence between island body size variants and mainland snakes. Within south eastern Australia, where populations of island giants, populations of island dwarfs, and mainland tiger snakes all occur, the maximum genetic divergence is only 0.38%. Dwarf tiger snakes are restricted to prey items that are much smaller than the prey items of mainland tiger snakes and giant tiger snakes are restricted to seasonally available prey items that are up three times larger than the prey items of mainland tiger snakes. We support the hypotheses that these body size shifts are due to strong selection imposed by the size of available prey items, rather than shared evolutionary history, and our results are consistent with the notion that adaptive plasticity also has played an important role in body size shifts. We suggest that plasticity displayed early on in the occupation of these new islands provided the flexibility necessary as the island's available prey items became more depauperate, but once the size range of available prey items was reduced, strong natural selection followed by genetic assimilation worked to optimize snake body size. The rate of body size divergence in haldanes is similar for dwarfs (h(g) = 0.0010) and giants (h(g) = 0.0020-0.0025) and is in line with other studies of rapid evolution. Our data provide strong evidence for rapid and repeated morphological divergence in the wild due to similar selective pressures acting in different directions.     

Prey envenomation does not improve digestive performance in western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox)

Although the toxic properties of snake venoms have been recognized throughout history, very little is known about the adaptive significance of these powerful mixtures. This study examined the popular hypothesis that prey envenomation enhances digestion by influencing the energetic costs of digestion and assimilation, gut passage time, and apparent assimilation efficiency (ASSIM) in western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox), a species whose venom is recognized for its comparatively high proteolytic activities. A complete randomized block design allowed repeated measures of specific dynamic action and gut passage time to be measured in eight snakes ingesting four feeding treatments (i.e., artificially envenomated live mice, artificially envenomated prekilled mice, saline injected live mice, and saline injected prekilled mice). A second experiment measured ASSIM in eight snakes ingesting a series of six artificially envenomated or six saline injected mice meals over an 8-week period. Contrary to expectations, the results of both these experiments revealed that envenomation had no significant influence on any of the measured digestive performance variables. Gut passage time averaged 6 days and ASSIM averaged 79.1%. Twenty-one hours following ingestion, postprandial metabolic rates exhibited factorial increases that averaged 3.9-fold greater than resting metabolic rate. Specific dynamic action lasted on average 88 hr and accounted for 26% of the total ingested energy. The results of this study reinforce the need to systematically examine the potential adaptive advantages that venoms confer on the snakes that produce them.     

Selection and control of Deborah numbers in plankton ecology

The Deborah number (De) is widely used to characterize processestaking place in deforming continua. De=(the time scale of aprocess)/(the time scale of deformation). When De >>lthe process thus takes place in a functionally fluid medium,but when De <<1 the regime is functionally solid. De hasbeen used to refine concepts in three pelagic processes. Dispersionof dividing cells may be characterized by De, and may be regulatedby means of secretions. Dispersion of microzones by diffusionand shear is characterized. The characteristic time of microzonesis shown to depend on the concentration. Because microzonessmear Out along the shear, to prevent nutrient-seekers and predatorsusing them as scent trails, organisms may convolute their microzonesby swimming, particularly across the shear. In a predator-preymodel, it has been shown that when De, (shear rate) (time takento swim radius of detection sphere), >2.6, not all the perceivedprey is accessible. More economical hunting strategies and thoseallowing access to more of the perceived prey, require bettersensory and navigational abilities. When De >2.6, the predatorwill perceive a greater flux of accessible prey when it swimsacross the shear than when it swims in the other two dimensions.De may help to understand many more biological processes indeforming media.     

Feeding ecology of North American gopher snakes (Pituophis catenifer, Colubridae)

Studies of food relations are important to our understanding of ecology at the individual, population and community levels. Detailed documentation of the diet of large‐bodied, widespread snakes allows us to assess size‐dependent and geographical variation in feeding preferences of gape‐limited predators. Furthermore, with knowledge of the food habits of sympatric taxa we can explore possible causes of interspecific differences in trophic niches. The feeding ecology of the North American gopher snake, Pituophis catenifer, was studied based on the stomach contents of more than 2600 preserved and free‐ranging specimens, and published and unpublished dietary records. Of 1066 items, mammals (797, 74.8%), birds (86, 8.1%), bird eggs (127, 11.9%), and lizards (35, 3.3%) were the most frequently eaten prey. Gopher snakes fed upon subterranean, nocturnal and diurnal prey. The serpents are primarily diurnal, but can also be active at night. Therefore, gopher snakes captured their victims by actively searching underground tunnel systems, retreat places and perching sites during the day, or by pursuing them or seizing them while they rested at night. Gopher snakes of all sizes preyed on mammals, but only individuals larger than 40 and 42 cm in snout–vent length took bird eggs and birds, respectively, possibly due to gape constraints in smaller serpents. Specimens that ate lizards were smaller than those that consumed mammals or birds. Gopher snakes raided nests regularly, as evidenced by the high frequency of nestling mammals and birds and avian eggs eaten. Most (332) P. catenifer contained single prey, but 95 animals contained 2–35 items. Of the 321 items for which direction of ingestion was determined, 284 (88.5%) were swallowed head‐first, 35 (10.9%) were ingested tail‐first, and two (0.6%) were taken sideways. Heavier gopher snakes took heavier prey, but heavier serpents ingested prey with smaller mass relative to snake mass, evidence that the lower limit of prey mass did not increase with snake mass. Specimens from the California Province and Arid Deserts (i.e. Mojave, Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts) took the largest proportion of lizards, whereas individuals from the Great Basin Desert consumed a higher percentage of mammals than serpents from other areas, and P. catenifer from the Great Plains ate a greater proportion of bird eggs. Differences in prey availability among biogeographical regions and unusual circumstances of particular gopher snake populations may account for these patterns. Gopher snakes have proportionally longer heads than broadly sympatric Rhinocheilus lecontei (long‐nosed snake), Charina bottae (rubber boa) and Lampropeltis zonata (California mountain kingsnake), which perhaps explains why, contrary to the case in P. catenifer, the smaller size classes of those three species do not eat mammals. © 2002 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002, 77 , 165–183.     

Fixed prey cue preferences among Dusky Pigmy Rattlesnakes (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Sistrurus miliarius barbouri</Emphasis>) raised on different long-term diets

Chemoreception is often crucial to the interaction between predators and their prey. Investigating the mechanisms controlling predator chemical preference gives insight into how selection molds traits directly involved in ecological interactions between species. In snakes, prey cue preferences are influenced by both direct genetic control and experience-based plasticity. We assessed prey preference in a group of Dusky Pigmy Rattlesnakes that had eaten only mice or lizards over a 5 year period to test whether genetics or plasticity primarily determine the preference phenotype. Our results provide evidence for genetic determination of preference for lizard chemical cues in pigmy rattlesnakes. Snakes preferred the scent of lizards, regardless of their initial diet, and the response to mouse scent did not differ from the water-only control. We discuss these findings in light of previous studies that manipulated snake diets over shorter timescales.     

Toxic,invasive treefrog creates evolutionary trap for native gartersnakes

Possession of unique defensive toxins by nonindigenous species may increase the likelihood of creating evolutionary traps for native predators. We tested the hypothesis that nonindigenous, toxic Cuban Treefrogs (Osteopilus septentrionalis) have created an evolutionary trap for native, generalist snakes. Additionally, we explored the possibility that populations of snakes that co-occur with Cuban Treefrogs have responded in ways that allow them to escape potential trap dynamics. To evaluate a potential fitness cost of consuming Cuban Treefrogs, we monitored growth of 61 wild-caught Common Gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) fed exclusive diets of either Cuban Treefrogs, native Green Treefrogs (Hyla cinerea), or native Golden Shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas). Snakes in the Cuban Treefrog diet treatment gained less than half the mass of those consuming native prey, and Cuban Treefrogs were significantly less digestible than native prey. There was no difference in the response of gartersnakes to prey scent cues of Cuban Treefrogs and Green Treefrogs. Our results indicate that Cuban Treefrogs likely represent an evolutionary trap for snakes because consumption of these frogs carries fitness costs, yet snakes fail to recognize this prey as being costly. We found no difference in growth or response to prey cues between snakes from invaded and non-invaded regions, suggesting snakes have not responded to escape trap dynamics. Interactions of native snakes and Cuban Treefrogs support the idea that introduced species with novel toxins may increase the likelihood of evolutionary trap formation.     

Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes

We tested some predictions relating metabolic constraints offoraging behavior and prey selection by comparing food handlingand utilization in four sympatric shrew species: Sorex minutus(mean body mass = 3.0 g), S. araneus (8.0 g), Neomys anomalus(10.0 g), and N. fodiens (14.4 g). Live fly larvae, mealwormlarvae, and aquatic arthropods were offered to shrews as smallprey (body mass <0.1 g). Live earthworms, snails, and smallfish were offered as large prey (>0.3 g). The larvae werethe high-nutrition food (>8 kJ/g), and the other prey werethe low-nutrition food (<4 kJ/g). The smallest shrew, S.minutus, utilized (ate + hoarded) <30% of offered food,and the other species utilized >48% of food. The largerthe shrew, the more prey it ate per capita. However, highlyenergetic insect larvae composed 75% of food utilized by S.minutus and only >40% of the food utilized by the other species. Thus, inverse relationships appeared between shrewbody mass and mass-specific food mass utilization and betweenshrew body mass and mass-specific food energy utilization:the largest shrew, N. fodiens, utilized the least food massand the least energy quantity per 1 g of its body mass. Also,the proportion of food hoarded by shrews decreased with increase in size of shrew. With the exception of S. araneus, the sizeof prey hoarded by the shrews was significantly larger thanthe size of prey eaten. Tiny S. minutus hoarded and ate smallerprey items than the other shrews, and large N. fodiens hoardedlarger prey than the other shrews.     

Comparison of cranial form and function in association with diet in natricine snakes

The skull of squamates has many functions, with food acquisition and ingestion being paramount. Snakes vary interspecifically in the frequency, size, and types of prey that are consumed. Natural selection should favor phenotypes that minimize the costs of energy acquisition; therefore, trophic morphology should reflect a snake's primary prey type to enhance some aspect of feeding performance. I measured 19 cranial variables for six natricine species that vary in the frequency with which they consume frogs and fish. Both conventional and phylogenetically corrected analyses indicated that fish‐eating snakes have relatively longer upper and lower jaw elements than frog‐eating snakes, which tended to have broader skull components. I also compared the ratio of the in‐lever to the out‐lever lengths of the jaw‐closing mechanism [jaw mechanical advantage (MA)] among species. Fish‐eating snakes had significantly lower MAs in the jaws than did the frog‐eating snakes. This result suggests that piscivores have faster closing jaws and that the jaws of frog‐eating snakes have higher closing forces. Cranial morphology and the functional demands of prey capture and ingestion appear to be associated with primary prey type in natricine snakes. J. Morphol., 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Do lizards and snakes really differ in their ability to take large prey? A study of relative prey mass and feeding tactics in lizards

Adaptations of snakes to overpower and ingest relatively large prey have attracted considerable research, whereas lizards generally are regarded as unable to subdue or ingest such large prey items. Our data challenge this assumption. On morphological grounds, most lizards lack the highly kinetic skulls that facilitate prey ingestion in macrostomate snakes, but (1) are capable of reducing large items into ingestible-sized pieces, and (2) have much larger heads relative to body length than do snakes. Thus, maximum ingestible prey size might be as high in some lizards as in snakes. Also, the willingness of lizards to tackle very large prey items may have been underestimated. Captive hatchling scincid lizards (Bassiana duperreyi) offered crickets of a range of relative prey masses (RPMs) attacked (and sometimes consumed parts of) crickets as large as or larger than their own body mass. RPM affected foraging responses: larger crickets were less likely to be attacked (especially on the abdomen), more likely to be avoided, and less likely to provide significant nutritional benefit to the predator. Nonetheless, lizards successfully attacked and consumed most crickets ≤35% of the predator’s own body mass, representing RPM as high as for most prey taken by snakes. Thus, although lizards lack the impressive cranial kinesis or prey-subduction adaptations of snakes, at least some lizards are capable of overpowering and ingesting prey items as large as those consumed by snakes of similar body sizes.     

Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?

I staged replicate encounters between unrestrained lizards andsnakes in outdoor enclosures to examine size-dependent predationwithin the common garden skink (Lampropholis guichenoti). Yellow-facedwhip snakes (Demansia psammophis) forage widely for activeprey and most often consumed large skinks, whereas death adders(Acanthophis antarcticus) ambush active prey and most oftenconsumed small skinks. Small-eyed snakes (Rhinoplocephalusnigrescens) forage widely for inactive prey and consumed bothsmall and large skinks equally often. Differential predationmay reflect active choice by the predator, differential preyvulnerability, or both. To test for active choice, I presentedforaging snakes with an inert small lizard versus an inertlarge lizard. They did not actively select lizards of a particularbody size. To test for differential prey vulnerability, I quantifiedvariation between small and large lizards in behavior thatis important for determining the outcome of predator—prey interactions. Snakes did not differentiate between integumentarychemicals from small and large lizards. Large lizards tendto flee from approaching predators, thereby eliciting attackby the visually oriented whip snakes. Small lizards were moremobile than large lizards and therefore more likely to passby sedentary death adders. Additionally, small skinks were more effectively lured by this sit-and-wait species and less likelyto avoid its first capture attempt. In contrast, overnightretreat site selection (not body size) determined a lizard'schances of being detected by small-eyed snakes. Patterns ofsize-dependent predation by elapid snakes may arise not becauseof active choice but as a function of species-specific predatortactics and prey behavior.     

Scent marking by voles in response to predation risk: a field-laboratory validation

Predators use scent to locate their prey, and prey animals oftenalter their behavior in response to predation risk. I testedthe hypothesis that voles would decrease their frequency ofscent marking in response to predation risk. I conducted trialsin which prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, and woodland voles,M. pinetorum, were allowed to scent mark ceramic tiles placedin their runways in the field. The tiles were subjected to oneof three treatments: scented with odor from mink, Mustela vison(a rodent predator); rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (a nonpredatormammal control); and no odor (control). No significant differenceswere found in the frequency of scent marking in response tothe three treatments for either species. To validate that volesdid not decrease their scent marking in response to predationrisk, I brought male prairie voles from the field site intothe laboratory and allowed them to scent mark white paper substratetreated with mink odor, rabbit odor, or no odor. No significantdifferences were found in the frequency of scent marks in responseto the three treatments. These results differ from what waspredicted based on laboratory studies with other species ofrodents that show avoidance, reproductive suppression, decreasedactivity, and reduced scent marking in response to odors ofpredators. Voles appear to scent mark different substrates andunder a wide variety of social and environmental situations,and this is not influenced by the presence of odor from a predator.     

Past and Present Risk: Exposure to Predator Chemical Cues Before and after Metamorphosis Influences Juvenile Wood Frog Behavior

Animals are exposed to different predators over their lifespan. This raises the question of whether exposure to predation risk in an early life stage affects the response to predators in subsequent life stages. In this study, we used wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to test whether exposure to cues indicating predation risk from dragonfly larvae during the wood frog larval stage affected post‐metamorphic activity level and avoidance of garter snake chemical cues. Dragonfly larvae prey upon wood frogs only during the larval stage, whereas garter snakes prey upon wood frogs during both the larval stage and the post‐metamorphic stage. Exposure to predation risk from dragonflies during the larval stage caused post‐metamorphic wood frog juveniles to have greater terrestrial activity than juvenile wood frogs that were not exposed to larval‐stage predation risk from dragonflies. However, exposure to predation risk as larvae did not affect juvenile wood frog responses to chemical cues from garter snakes. Wood frogs exposed as larvae to predation risk from dragonfly larvae avoided garter snake chemical cues to the same extent as wood frog larvae not exposed to predation risk from dragonfly larvae. Our results demonstrate that while some general behaviors exhibit carry‐over effects from earlier life stages, behavioral responses to predators may remain independent of conditions experienced in earlier life stages.     

The Relationship Between Foraging Ecology and Lizard Chemoreception: Can a Snake Analogue (Burton’s Legless Lizard,Lialis burtonis) Detect Prey Scent?

In lizards and snakes, foraging mode (active vs. ambush) is highly correlated with the ability to detect prey chemical cues, and the way in which such cues are utilized. Ambush-foraging lizards tend not to recognize prey scent, whereas active foragers do. Prey scent often elicits strikes in actively-foraging snakes, while ambushers use it to select profitable foraging sites. We tested the influence of foraging ecology on the evolution of squamate chemoreception by gauging the response of Burton's legless lizard ( Lialis burtonis Gray, Pygopodidae) to prey chemical cues. Lialis burtonis is the ecological equivalent of an ambush-foraging snake, feeding at infrequent intervals on relatively large prey, which are swallowed whole. Captive L. burtonis did not respond to prey odour in any manner: prey chemical cues did not elicit elevated tongue-flick rates or feeding strikes, nor were they utilized in the selection of ambush sites. Like other ambushing lizards, L. burtonis appears to be a visually oriented predator. In contrast, an active forager in the same family, the common scaly-foot ( Pygopus lepidopodus ), did tongue-flick in response to odours of its preferred prey. These results extend the correlation between lizard foraging mode and chemosensory abilities to a heretofore-unstudied family, the Pygopodidae.     

Density-dependent predation by skunks using olfactory search images

The formation of search images can create density-dependent predation. Predators have been shown to form search images when searching for many small prey items in one feeding session. This paper reports experiments that test whether striped skunks can form olfactory search images in other situations: when prey are found over several days, when prey are large, and when prey are found in certain habitats. Striped skunks were raised in captivity, and their reaction distance to food was measured outside in a natural grassy area. In experiment 1 skunks were offered many small food items for several days in a row. From one day to the next, skunks initially detected food from further away, they increased detection distance faster and their maximum detection distance increased – i.e., they formed olfactory search images faster and stronger from one day to the next. In experiment 2 skunks formed search images over several days when finding only one large food item per day. In experiment 3 skunks lost olfactory search images when they entered habitats in which they had previously searched for another type of food. These long-term search images magnify the effects of short-term search images, extend the effects of short- term search image to longer time spans, and affect different species from short-term search images. Received: 26 July 1996 / Accepted: 13 December 1996