Dynamics of Xanthophyll-Cycle Activity in Different Antenna Subcomplexes in the Photosynthetic Membranes of Higher Plants (The Relationship between Zeaxanthin Conversion and Nonphotochemical Fluorescence Quenching)

The generation of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (qN) in the antenna of photosystem II (PSII) is accompanied by the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin to antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin. The function of zeaxanthin in two mechanisms of qN, energy-dependent quenching (qE) and photoinhibitory quenching (qI), was investigated by measuring the de-epoxidation state in the antenna subcomplexes of PSII during the generation and relaxation of qN under varying conditions. Three different antenna subcomplexes were separated by isoelectric focusing: Lhcb1/2/3, Lhcb5/6, and the Lhcb4/PSII core. Under all conditions, the highest de-epoxidation state was detected in Lhcb1/2/3 and Lhcb5/6. The kinetics of de-epoxidation in these complexes were found to be similar to the formation of qE. The Lhcb4/PSII core showed the most pronounced differences in the de-epoxidation state when illumination with low and high light intensities was compared, correlating roughly with the differences in qI. Furthermore, the epoxidation kinetics in the Lhcb4/PSII core showed the most pronounced differences of all subcomplexes when comparing the epoxidation after either moderate or very strong photoinhibitory preillumination. Our data support the suggestion that zeaxanthin formation/epoxidation in Lhcb1-3 and Lhcb5/6 may be related to qE, and in Lhcb4 (and/or PSII core) to qI.     

Analysis of non-photochemical energy dissipating processes in wild type <Emphasis Type="Italic">Dunaliella salina</Emphasis> (green algae) and in <Emphasis Type="Italic">zea1</Emphasis>, a mutant constitutively accumulating zeaxanthin

Generally there is a correlation between the amount of zeaxanthin accumulated within the chloroplast of oxygenic photosynthetic organisms and the degree of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Although constitutive accumulation of zeaxanthin can help protect plants from photo-oxidative stress, organisms with such a phenotype have been reported to have altered rates of NPQ induction. In this study, basic fluorescence principles and the routinely used NPQ analysis technique were employed to investigate excitation energy quenching in the unicellular green alga Dunaliella salina, in both wild type (WT) and a mutant, zea1, constitutively accumulating zeaxanthin under all growth conditions. The results showed that, in D. salina, NPQ is a multi-component process consisting of energy- or ΔpH-dependent quenching (qE), state-transition quenching (qT), and photoinhibition quenching (qI). Despite the vast difference in the amount of zeaxanthin in WT and the zea1 mutant grown under low light, the overall kinetics of NPQ induction were almost the same. Only a slight difference in the relative contribution of each quenching component could be detected. Of all the NPQ subcomponents, qE seemed to be the primary NPQ operating in this alga in response to short-term exposure to excessive irradiance. Whenever qE could not operate, i.e., in the presence of nigericin, or under conditions where the level of photon flux is beyond its quenching power, qT and/or qI could adequately compensate its photoprotective function.     

Xanthophyll cycle mutants from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii indicate a role for zeaxanthin in the D1 protein turnover

Photosynthetic activity, pigment conversion and D1 protein degradation under high light stress has been investigated in a wild type strain and two xanthophyll cycle mutants (npq1 and npq2) of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Wild type cells exhibited the well-known inactivation of photosystem II in high light, which was accompanied by the loss of β-carotene and a concomitant increase of zeaxanthin. Complete degradation of D1 protein was found after 2 h of illumination in the presence of chloramphenicol, an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis. The npq1 mutant, which is unable to convert violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, showed a very similar behaviour. For the npq2 mutant, however, which is unable to form violaxanthin from zeaxanthin and thus contains high amounts of zeaxanthin even in low light, photosystem II inactivation was less pronounced. This was paralleled by a much slower D1 protein degradation in chloramphenicol treated cells. Our results support a protective role for zeaxanthin against high light-induced photosystem II inactivation resulting in a slowed-down D1 protein turnover.     

Xanthophyll cycle and energy-dependent fluorescence quenching in leaves from pea plants grown under intermittent light

The possible role of zeaxanthin formation and antenna proteins in energy-dependent chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (qE) has been investigated. Intermittent-light-grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants that lack most of the chlorophyll a/b antenna proteins exhibited a significantly reduced qE upon illumination with respect to control plants. On the other hand, the violaxanthin content related to the number of reaction centers and to xanthophyll cycle activity, i.e. the conversion of violaxanthin into zeaxanthin, was found to be increased in the antenna-protein-depleted plants. Western blot analyses indicated that, with the exception of CP 26, the content of all chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins in these plants is reduced to less than 10% of control values. The results indicate that chlorophyll a/b-binding antenna proteins are involved in the energy-dependent fluorescence quenching but that only a part of qE can be attributed to quenching by chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins. It seems very unlikely that xanthophylls are exclusively responsible for the qE mechanism.Abbreviations CAB chlorophyll a/b-binding - Chl chlorophyll - F_V variable fluorescence - IML intermittent light - LHC light harvesting complex - PFD photon flux density - qP photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluoresence - qN non-photochemical quenching - qE energy-dependent quenching - qI photoinhibitory quenching - qT quenching by state transition     

Identification of a slowly inducible zeaxanthin-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence generated under steady-state conditions in Arabidopsis

The induction and relaxation of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) under steady-state conditions, i.e. during up to 90 min of illumination at saturating light intensities, was studied in Arabidopsis thaliana. Besides the well-characterized fast qE and the very slow qI component of NPQ, the analysis of the NPQ dynamics identified a zeaxanthin (Zx) dependent component which we term qZ. The formation (rise time 10-15 min) and relaxation (lifetime 10-15 min) of qZ correlated with the synthesis and epoxidation of Zx, respectively. Comparative analysis of different NPQ mutants from Arabidopsis showed that qZ was clearly not related to qE, qT or qI and thus represents a separate, Zx-dependent NPQ component.     

The causes of altered chlorophyll fluorescence quenching induction in the Arabidopsis mutant lacking all minor antenna complexes

Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of chlorophyll fluorescence is the process by which excess light energy is harmlessly dissipated within the photosynthetic membrane. The fastest component of NPQ, known as energy-dependent quenching (qE), occurs within minutes, but the site and mechanism of qE remain of great debate. Here, the chlorophyll fluorescence of Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (WT) plants was compared to mutants lacking all minor antenna complexes (NoM). Upon illumination, NoM exhibits altered chlorophyll fluorescence quenching induction (i.e. from the dark-adapted state) characterised by three different stages: (i) a fast quenching component, (ii) transient fluorescence recovery and (iii) a second quenching component. The initial fast quenching component originates in light harvesting complex II (LHCII) trimers and is dependent upon PsbS and the formation of a proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane (ΔpH). Transient fluorescence recovery is likely to occur in both WT and NoM plants, but it cannot be overcome in NoM due to impaired ΔpH formation and a reduced zeaxanthin synthesis rate. Moreover, an enhanced fluorescence emission peak at ~679?nm in NoM plants indicates detachment of LHCII trimers from the bulk antenna system, which could also contribute to the transient fluorescence recovery. Finally, the second quenching component is triggered by both ΔpH and PsbS and enhanced by zeaxanthin synthesis. This study indicates that minor antenna complexes are not essential for qE, but reveals their importance in electron stransport, ΔpH formation and zeaxanthin synthesis.     

Thermal energy dissipation in reaction centres and in the antenna of photosystem II protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation

Seasonal differences have been observed in the ability of desiccated mosses to dissipate absorbed light energy harmlessly into heat. During the dry summer season desiccation-tolerant mosses were more protected against photo-oxidative damage in the dry state than during the more humid winter season. Investigation of the differences revealed that phototolerance could be acquired or lost even under laboratory conditions. When a desiccated poikilohydric moss such as Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus is in the photosensitive state, the primary quinone, Q(A), in the reaction centre of photosystem II is readily reduced even by low intensity illumination as indicated by reversibly increased chlorophyll fluorescence. No such reduction is observed even under strong illumination in desiccated mosses after phototolerance has been acquired. In this state, reductive charge stabilization is replaced by energy dissipation. As a consequence, chlorophyll fluorescence is quenched. Different mechanisms are responsible for quenching. One is based on the presence of zeaxanthin provided drying occurs in the light. This mechanism is known to be controlled by a protonation reaction which is based on proton-coupled electron transport while the moss is still hydrated. Another mechanism which also requires light for activation, but no protonation, is activated during desiccation. While water is slowly lost, fluorescence is quenched. In this situation, an absorption band formed at 800 nm in the light is stabilized. It loses reversibility on darkening. Comparable kinetics of fluorescence quenching and 800 nm signals as well as the linear relationship between non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) and loss of stable charge separation in photosystem II reaction centres suggested that desiccation-induced quenching is a property of photosystem II reaction centres. During desiccation, quenchers accumulate which are stable in the absence of water but revert to non-quenching molecular species on hydration. Together with zeaxanthin-dependent energy dissipation, desiccation-induced thermal energy dissipation protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation, ensuring survival during drought periods.     

Characterization of the fast and slow reversible components of non-photochemical quenching in isolated pea thylakoids by picosecond time-resolved chlorophyll fluorescence analysis.

The fast and slow reversible components of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching commonly assigned to the qE and the qI mechanism have been studied in isolated pea thylakoids which were prepared from leaves after a moderate photoinhibitory treatment. Chlorophyll fluorescence decays were measured at picosecond resolution and analyzed on the basis of the heterogeneous exciton/radical pair equilibrium model. Our results show that the fast reversible non-photochemical quenching is completely assigned to the PS II antenna and is related to zeaxanthin. The slow reversible qI type quenching is located at the PS II reaction center and involves enhanced nonradiative decay of the primary charge separated state to its ground state and/or triplet excited state. Apart from its independence from the proton gradient, the qI quenching shows striking similarities to a particular form of qE quenching which is also located at the PS II reaction center and has resently been resolved in isolated thylakoids from dark-adapted leaves [Wagner, B., et al. (1996) J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 36, 339-350]. Our data suggest that during exposure to the supersaturating light the reaction center qE component was replaced by qI quenching. This qE to qI transition is supposed to be part of the mechanism of the long-term downregulation of PS II during photoinhibition. It is also evident that under the conditions used in our study zeaxanthin-dependent antenna quenching is not involved in the slow reversible downregulation of PS II but that it retains its dependence on the proton gradient during exposure to strong light.     

The Kinetics of Zeaxanthin Formation Is Retarded by Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide

The de-epoxidation of violaxanthin to antheraxanthin (Anth) and zeaxanthin (Zeax) in the xanthophyll cycle of higher plants and the generation of nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching in the antenna of photosystem II (PSII) are induced by acidification of the thylakoid lumen. Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) has been shown (a) to bind to lumen-exposed carboxy groups of antenna proteins and (b) to inhibit the pH-dependent fluorescence quenching. The possible influence of DCCD on the de-epoxidation reactions has been investigated in isolated pea (Pisum sativum L.) thylakoids. The Zeax formation was found to be slowed down in the presence of DCCD. The second step (Anth → Zeax) of the reaction sequence seemed to be more affected than the violaxanthin → Anth conversion. Comparative studies with antenna-depleted thylakoids from plants grown under intermittent light and with unstacked thylakoids were in agreement with the assumption that binding of DCCD to antenna proteins is probably responsible for the retarded kinetics. Analyses of the DCCD-induced alterations in different antenna subcomplexes showed that Zeax formation in the PSII antenna proteins was predominantly influenced by DCCD, whereas Zeax formation in photosystem I was nearly unaffected. Our data support the suggestion that DCCD binding to PSII antenna proteins is responsible for the observed alterations in xanthophyll conversion.     

Protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against damage by excessive illumination in homoiohydric leaves and poikilohydric mosses and lichens

Experimental work on the control of photosystem II in the photosynthetic apparatus of higher plants, mosses and lichens is reviewed on a background of current literature. Transmembrane proton transport during photoassimilatory and photorespiratory electron flows is considered insufficient for producing the intrathylakoid acidification necessary for control of photosystem II activity under excessive illumination. Oxygen reduction during the Mehler reaction is slow. Together with associated reactions (the water-water cycle), it poises the electron transport chain for coupled cyclic electron transport rather than acting as an efficient electron sink. Coupled electron transport not accompanied by ATP consumption in associated reactions provides the additional thylakoid acidification needed for the binding of zeaxanthin to a chlorophyll-containing thylakoid protein. This results in the formation of energy-dissipating traps in the antennae of photosystem II. Competition for energy capture decreases the activity of photosystem II. In hydrated mosses and lichens, but not in leaves of higher plants, protein protonation and zeaxanthin availability are fully sufficient for effective energy dissipation even when photosystem II reaction centres are open. In leaves, an additional light reaction is required, and energy dissipation occurs not only in the antennae but also in reaction centres. Loss of chlorophyll fluorescence during the drying of predarkened poikilohydric mosses and lichens indicates energy dissipation in the dry state which is unrelated to protonation and zeaxanthin availability. Excitation of photosystem II by sunlight is not destructive in these dry organisms, whereas photosystem II activity of dried leaves is rapidly lost under strong illumination.     

The Xanthophyll Cycle Modulates the Kinetics of Nonphotochemical Energy Dissipation in Isolated Light-Harvesting Complexes, Intact Chloroplasts, and Leaves of Spinach

We analyzed the kinetics of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (qN) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaves, chloroplasts, and purified light-harvesting complexes. The characteristic biphasic pattern of fluorescence quenching in dark-adapted leaves, which was removed by preillumination, was evidence of light activation of qN, a process correlated with the de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids. Chloroplasts isolated from dark-adapted and light-activated leaves confirmed the nature of light activation: faster and greater quenching at a subsaturating transthylakoid pH gradient. The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding complexes of photosystem II were isolated from dark-adapted and light-activated leaves. When isolated from light-activated leaves, these complexes showed an increase in the rate of quenching in vitro compared with samples prepared from dark-adapted leaves. In all cases, the quenching kinetics were fitted to a single component hyperbolic function. For leaves, chloroplasts, and light-harvesting complexes, the presence of zeaxanthin was associated with an increased rate constant for the induction of quenching. We discuss the significance of these observations in terms of the mechanism and control of qN.     

The role of ΔpH-dependent dissipation of excitation energy in protecting photosystem II against light-induced damage in Arabidopsis thaliana

The Arabidopsis thaliana subunit PsbS of photosystem II (PSII) is essential for the non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and thus for ΔpH-dependent energy dissipation (qE). As a result of the excision of an En-transposon, a frameshift mutation in the psbS gene was obtained, which results in the complete absence of the PsbS protein and of qE. Two-dimensional gel analyses of thylakoid membranes indicated that the depletion of PsbS has no effect on PSII composition, excluding a structural role for PsbS in the organization of the PSII antenna. The susceptibility of mutant plants to photoinactivation of PSII was significantly increased during exposure to high light for up to 8 h. Divergence of mutant plants from wild-type levels of photoinactivation were most pronounced during the first 2 h of illumination, while after longer exposure times the rate of PSII inactivation were similar in both genotypes. The increased PSII inactivation in the mutant was not accompanied by an increased rate of D1 protein degradation, and recovery of PSII activity in the mutant under low light was similar or even faster in comparison to wild-type plants. However, growth under high light intensities resulted in decreased growth rates of psbs mutant plants. We conclude that energy dissipation in PSII related to qE is not primarily required for the protection of PSII against light-induced destruction, but may rather be involved in reducing the electron pressure on the photosynthetic electron transport chain at saturating light intensities.     

Acclimation- and mutation-induced enhancement of PsbS levels affects the kinetics of non-photochemical quenching in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis>

The efficiency of photosystem II antenna complexes (LHCs) in higher plants must be regulated to avoid potentially damaging overexcitation of the reaction centre in excess light. Regulation is achieved via a feedback mechanism known as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), triggered the proton gradient (ΔpH) causing heat dissipation within the LHC antenna. ΔpH causes protonation of the LHCs, the PsbS protein and triggers the enzymatic de-epoxidation of the xanthophyll, violaxanthin, to zeaxanthin. A key step in understanding the mechanism is to decipher whether PsbS and zeaxanthin cooperate to promote NPQ. To obtain clues about their respective functions we studied the effects of PsbS and zeaxanthin on the rates of NPQ formation and relaxation in wild-type Arabidopsis leaves and those overexpressing PsbS (L17) or lacking zeaxanthin (npq1). Overexpression of PsbS was found to increase the rate of NPQ formation, as previously reported for zeaxanthin. However, PsbS overexpression also increased the rate of NPQ relaxation, unlike zeaxanthin, which is known decrease the rate. The enhancement of PsbS levels in plants lacking zeaxanthin (npq1) by either acclimation to high light or crossing with L17 plants showed that the effect of PsbS was independent of zeaxanthin. PsbS levels also affected the kinetics of the 535 nm absorption change (ΔA535), which monitors the formation of the conformational state of the LHC antenna associated with NPQ, in an identical way. The antagonistic action of PsbS and zeaxanthin with respect to NPQ and ΔA535 relaxation kinetics suggests that the two molecules have distinct regulatory functions.     

Inhibition of zeaxanthin formation and of rapid changes in radiationless energy dissipation by dithiothreitol in spinach leaves and chloroplasts

Dithiothreitol, which completely inhibits the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, was used to obtain evidence for a causal relationship between zeaxanthin and the dissipation of excess excitation energy in the photochemical apparatus in Spinicia oleracea L. In both leaves and chloroplasts, inhibition of zeaxanthin formation by dithiothreitol was accompanied by inhibition of a component of nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching. This component was characterized by a quenching of instantaneous fluorescence (F_o) and a linear relationship between the calculated rate constant for radiationless energy dissipation in the antenna chlorophyll and the zeaxanthin content. In leaves, this zeaxanthin-associated quenching, which relaxed within a few minutes upon darkening, was the major component of nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching determined in the light, i.e. it represented the `high-energy-state' quenching. In isolated chloroplasts, the zeaxanthin-associated quenching was a smaller component of total nonphotochemical quenching and there was a second, rapidly reversible high-energy-state component of fluorescence quenching which occurred in the absence of zeaxanthin and was not accompanied by F_o quenching. Leaves, but not chloroplasts, were capable of maintaining the electron acceptor, Q, of photosystem II in a low reduction state up to high degrees of excessive light and thus high degrees of nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching. When ascorbate, which serves as the reductant for violaxanthin de-epoxidation, was added to chloroplast suspensions, zeaxanthin formation at low photon flux densities was stimulated and the relationship between nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching and the reduction state in chloroplasts then became more similar to that found in leaves. We conclude that the inhibition of zeaxanthin-associated fluorescence quenching by dithiothreitol provides further evidence that there exists a close relationship between zeaxanthin and potentially photoprotective dissipation of excess excitation energy in the antenna chlorophyll.     

The carotenoid zeaxanthin and ‘high-energy-state quenching’ of chlorophyll fluorescence

The possibility that zeaxanthin mediates the dissipation of an excess of excitation energy in the antenna chlorophyll of the photochemical apparatus has been tested through the use of an inhibitor of violaxanthin de-epoxidation, dithiothreitol (DTT), as well as through the comparison of two closely related organisms (green and blue-green algal lichens), one of which (blue-green algal lichen) naturally lacks the xanthophyll cycle. In spinach leaves, DTT inhibited a major component of the rapidly relaxing high-energy-state quenching' of chlorophyll fluorescence, which was associated with a quenching of the level of initial fluorescence (F₀) and exhibited a close correlation with the zeaxanthin content of leaves when fluorescence quenching was expressed as the rate constant for radiationless energy dissipation in the antenna chlorophyll. Green algal lichens, which possess the xanthophyll cycle, exhibited the same type of fluorescence quenching as that observed in leaves. Two groups of blue-green algal lichens were used for a comparison with these green algal lichens. A group of zeaxanthin-free blue-green algal lichens did not exhibit the type of chlorophyll fluorescence quenching indicative of energy dissipation in the pigment bed. In contrast, a group of blue-green algal lichens which had formed zeaxanthin slowly through reactions other than the xanthophyll cycle, did show a very similar response to that of leaves and green algal lichens. Fluorescence quenching indicative of radiationless energy dissipation in the antenna chlorophyll was the predominant component of high-energy-state quenching in spinach leaves under conditions allowing for high rates of steady-state photosynthesis. A second, but distinctly different type of high-energy-state quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, which was not inhibited by DTT (i.e., it was zeaxanthin independent) and which is possibly associated with the photosystem II reaction center, occurred in addition to that associated with zeaxanthin in leaves under a range of conditions which were less favorable for linear photosynthetic electron flow. In intact chloroplasts isolated from (zeaxanthin-free) spinach leaves a combination of these two types of rapidly reversible fluorescence quenching occurred under all conditions examined.Abbreviations DTT dithiothreitol - F₀ (or F₀) yield of instantaneous fluorescence at open PS II reaction centers in the dark (or during actinic illumination) - F_M (or F_M) yield of maximum fluorescence induced by a saturation pulse of light in the dark (or during actinic illumination) - F_V (or F_V) yield of variable fluorescence induced by a saturating pulse of light in the dark (or during actinic illumination) - k _D rate constant for radiationless energy dissipation in the antenna chlorophyll - SV Stern-Volmer equation - PFD photon flux density - PS I photosystem I - PS II photosystem II - Q_A acceptor of photosystem II - q_N coefficient of nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching - q_P coefficient of photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching     

A few molecules of zeaxanthin per reaction centre of photosystem II permit effective thermal dissipation of light energy in photosystem II of a poikilohydric moss

The relationship between thermal dissipation of light energy (as indicated by the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence), zeaxanthin availability and protonation reactions was investigated in the moss Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus (Hedw.) Warnst. In the absence of zeaxanthin and actinic illumination, acidification by 20% CO₂ in air was incapable of quenching basal, so-called F ₀ fluorescence either in the moss or in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves. However, 1-s light pulses given either every 40, 60 or 200 s increased thermal dissipation as indicated by F ₀ and F _m quenching in the presence of 20% CO₂ in air in the moss, but not in spinach while reaction centres of photosystem II (PSII) were photochemically open. In the moss, a few short light pulses, which were separated by prolonged dark times, were sufficient to raise zeaxanthin levels in the presence of 20% CO₂ in air. Simultaneously, quantum efficiency of charge separation in PSII was decreased. Increasing the CO₂ concentration beyond 20% further decreased quantum efficiency even in the absence of short light pulses. Under conditions optimal for fluorescence quenching, one molecule of zeaxanthin per reaction centre of PSII was sufficient to decrease quantum efficiency of charge separation in PSII by 50%. Thus, in combination with a protonation reaction, one molecule of zeaxanthin was as efficient at capturing excitation energy as a photochemically open reaction centre. The data are discussed in relation to the interaction between zeaxanthin and thylakoid protonation, which enables effective thermal dissipation of light energy in the antennae of PSII in the moss but not in higher plants when actinic illumination is absent. Received: 8 April 2000 / Accepted: 31 August 2000     

Analysis of the Heat Stress Induced Quenching of Variable Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Beet Spinach Leaves: Possible Accumulation of Oxidized Quencher P680+ under High Illumination

Effect of preheating of beet spinach leaves on chlorophyll a fluorescence yield was analyzed with the help of additional high intensity illumination pulses using a pulse modulated fluorometer. Preheating at mildly elevated temperature (35–45°C) causes a shift in the redox state of secondary donor of photosystem II, possibly due to uncoupling of phosphorylation because of thermal induced membrane disorganization and associated alkalinization of intra thylakoid space. Also, at these preheating temperatures, a rise in photosystem I catalyzed electron transfer has been shown to occur. These two effects induce rapid quenching of Chi a fluorescence, which drops even in the presence of actinic light, below the level of initial fluorescence (F_o′ monitored by the weak modulated probing light. Preheating of leaf segments induces an increase in fluorescence in the presence of dluron, which blocks electron flow between two photosystems, and thus this increases in fluorescence yield (F_o′ as monitored by weak modulated light, is not solely due to disorganization of light harvesting Chi-protein complex but also due to a shift in the redox equilibrium of the donor at the oxidizing side of photosystem II resulting in rapid reduction of Q_A the stable primary acceptor of photosystem II. In 50°C preheated DCMU treated samples, the fluorescence yield increases in weak modulated light and it approaches that of maximal steady state (F_max) level. At preheating temperature of 48°–50°C, the inactivation of enzymes in the reducing side of photosystem I, causes an impairment of the reoxidation of QA and under this condition, a strong illumination causes quenching of Chi a fluorescence. This quenching seems to arise because of accumulation of the P680⁺, the oxidized physiological donor of photosystem which is a quencher of Chi a fluorescence. This quenching depended on the pulse intensity and duration which saturates P680⁺ accumulation and is greatly manifested when water oxidation complex is damaged.     

Thermal dissipation of light energy is regulated differently and by different mechanisms in lichens and higher plants

Modulated chlorophyll fluorescence was used to compare dissipation of light energy as heat in photosystem II of homoiohydric and poikilohydric photosynthetic organisms which were either hydrated or dehydrated. In hydrated chlorolichens with an alga as the photobiont, fluorescence quenching revealed a dominant mechanism of energy dissipation which was based on a protonation reaction when zeaxanthin was present. CO2 was effective as a weak protonating agent and actinic light was not necessary. In a hydrated cyanobacterial lichen, protonation by CO2 was ineffective to initiate energy dissipation. This was also true for leaves of higher plants. Thus, regulation of zeaxanthin-dependent energy dissipation by protonation was different in leaves and in chlorolichens. A mechanism of energy dissipation different from that based on zeaxanthin became apparent on dehydration of both lichens and leaves. Quenching of maximum or Fm fluorescence increased strongly during dehydration. In lichens, this was also true for so-called basal or Fo fluorescence. In contrast to zeaxanthin-dependent quenching, dehydration-induced quenching could not be inhibited by dithiothreitol. Both zeaxanthin-dependent and dehydration-induced quenching cooperated in chlorolichens to increase thermal dissipation of light energy if desiccation occurred in the light. In cyanolichens, which do not possess a zeaxanthin cycle, only desiccation-induced thermal energy dissipation was active in the dry state. Fluorescence emission spectra of chlorolichens revealed stronger desiccation-induced suppression of 685-nm fluorescence than of 720-nm fluorescence. In agreement with earlier reports of , fluorescence excitation data showed that desiccation reduced flow of excitation energy from chlorophyll b of the light harvesting complex II to emitting centres more than flow from chlorophyll a of core pigments. The data are discussed in relation to regulation and localization of thermal energy dissipation mechanisms. It is concluded that desiccation-induced fluorescence quenching of lichens results from the reversible conversion of energy-conserving to energy-dissipating photosystem II core complexes.     

Relative contributions of zeaxanthin-related and zeaxanthin-unrelated types of ;high-energy-state' quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in spinach leaves exposed to various environmental conditions

We have identified two rapidly relaxing components of non-photochemical fluorescence quenching which suggests that dissipative processes occur in two different sites in the photochemical system of leaves. Under a variety of treatment conditions involving different leaf temperatures, photon flux densities (PFD), exposure times, and in the presence of 5% CO₂ or 2% O₂, no CO₂, the components of nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching were characterized with respect to their sensitivity to dithiothreitol (DTT, which completely inhibits zeaxanthin formation), the effect on instantaneous fluorescence, and the rapidity of relaxation upon darkening. Under most circumstances the DTT-sensitive component (associated with a quenching of instantaneous fluorescence and correlated with zeaxanthin) represented the majority of the rapidly relaxing portion of fluorescence quenching. A DTT-insensitive (zeaxanthin-independent) component, which also relaxed rapidly upon darkening but was not associated with a quenching of instantaneous fluorescence, became proportionally greater in an atmosphere of 2% O₂ and no CO₂, at elevated leaf temperatures, and to some degree during the induction of photosynthesis (1 minute after the onset of illumination). A third component which was also DTT-insensitive and was sustained upon darkening, was largely suppressed in 2% O₂, O% CO₂. We conclude that, under conditions favorable for photosynthesis, energy dissipation occurred mainly in the chlorophyll antennae whereas, under conditions less favorable for photosynthesis, a second dissipation process, probably in or around the reaction center of photosystem II, also developed. Furthermore, evidence is presented that the zeaxanthin-associated dissipation process prevents sustained inactivation of photochemistry by excessive light.