Extended base pair complementarity between U1 snRNA and the 5' splice site does not inhibit splicing in higher eukaryotes, but rather increases 5' splice site recognition

Spliceosome formation is initiated by the recognition of the 5′ splice site through formation of an RNA duplex between the 5′ splice site and U1 snRNA. We have previously shown that RNA duplex formation between U1 snRNA and the 5′ splice site can protect pre-mRNAs from degradation prior to splicing. This initial RNA duplex must be disrupted to expose the 5′ splice site sequence for base pairing with U6 snRNA and to form the active spliceosome. Here, we investigated whether hyperstabilization of the U1 snRNA/5′ splice site duplex interferes with splicing efficiency in human cell lines or nuclear extracts. Unlike observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we demonstrate that an extended U1 snRNA/5′ splice site interaction does not decrease splicing efficiency, but rather increases 5′ splice site recognition and exon inclusion. However, low complementarity of the 5′ splice site to U1 snRNA significantly increases exon skipping and RNA degradation. Although the splicing mechanisms are conserved between human and S.cerevisiae, these results demonstrate that distinct differences exist in the activation of the spliceosome.     

Functional Analysis of the Integrator Subunit 12 Identifies a Microdomain That Mediates Activation of the Drosophila Integrator Complex

The Drosophila integrator complex consists of 14 subunits that associate with the C terminus of Rpb1 and catalyze the endonucleolytic cleavage of nascent snRNAs near their 3′ ends. Although disruption of almost any integrator subunit causes snRNA misprocessing, very little is known about the role of the individual subunits or the network of structural and functional interactions that exist within the complex. Here we developed an RNAi rescue assay in Drosophila S2 cells to identify functional domains within integrator subunit 12 (IntS12) required for snRNA 3′ end formation. Surprisingly, the defining feature of the Ints12 protein, a highly conserved and centrally located plant homeodomain finger domain, is not required for reporter snRNA 3′ end cleavage. Rather, we find a small, 45-amino acid N-terminal microdomain to be both necessary and nearly sufficient for snRNA biogenesis in cells depleted of endogenous IntS12 protein. This IntS12 microdomain can function autonomously, restoring full integrator processing activity when introduced into a heterologous protein. Moreover, mutations within the microdomain not only disrupt IntS12 function but also abolish binding to other integrator subunits. Finally, the IntS12 microdomain is sufficient to interact and stabilize the putative scaffold integrator subunit, IntS1. Collectively, these results identify an unexpected interaction between the largest and smallest integrator subunits that is essential for the 3′ end formation of Drosophila snRNA.     

An RNAi screen identifies additional members of the Drosophila Integrator complex and a requirement for cyclin C/Cdk8 in snRNA 3′-end formation

Formation of the 3′ end of RNA polymerase II–transcribed snRNAs requires a poorly understood group of proteins called the Integrator complex. Here we used a fluorescence-based read-through reporter that expresses GFP in response to snRNA misprocessing and performed a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila S2 cells to identify novel factors required for snRNA 3′-end formation. In addition to the known Integrator complex members, we identified Asunder and CG4785 as additional Integrator subunits. Functional and biochemical experiments revealed that Asunder and CG4785 are additional core members of the Integrator complex. We also identified a conserved requirement in both fly and human snRNA 3′-end processing for cyclin C and Cdk8 that is distinct from their function in the Mediator Cdk8 module. Moreover, we observed biochemical association between Integrator proteins and cyclin C/Cdk8, and that overexpression of a kinase-dead Cdk8 causes snRNA misprocessing. These data functionally define the Drosophila Integrator complex and demonstrate an additional function for cyclin C/Cdk8 unrelated to its function in Mediator.     

Tra2-Mediated Recognition of HIV-1 5′ Splice Site D3 as a Key Factor in the Processing of vpr mRNA

Small noncoding HIV-1 leader exon 3 is defined by its splice sites A2 and D3. While 3′ splice site (3′ss) A2 needs to be activated for vpr mRNA formation, the location of the vpr start codon within downstream intron 3 requires silencing of splicing at 5′ss D3. Here we show that the inclusion of both HIV-1 exon 3 and vpr mRNA processing is promoted by an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE_vpr) localized between exonic splicing silencer ESSV and 5′ss D3. The ESE_vpr sequence was found to be bound by members of the Transformer 2 (Tra2) protein family. Coexpression of these proteins in provirus-transfected cells led to an increase in the levels of exon 3 inclusion, confirming that they act through ESE_vpr. Further analyses revealed that ESE_vpr supports the binding of U1 snRNA at 5′ss D3, allowing bridging interactions across the upstream exon with 3′ss A2. In line with this, an increase or decrease in the complementarity of 5′ss D3 to the 5′ end of U1 snRNA was accompanied by a higher or lower vpr expression level. Activation of 3′ss A2 through the proposed bridging interactions, however, was not dependent on the splicing competence of 5′ss D3 because rendering it splicing defective but still competent for efficient U1 snRNA binding maintained the enhancing function of D3. Therefore, we propose that splicing at 3′ss A2 occurs temporally between the binding of U1 snRNA and splicing at D3.     

Solid-phase processing of U2 snRNA precursors

HeLa cell cytoplasmic extracts contain both precursors to small nuclear RNA (snRNA) U2 and an activity that is capable of trimming these snRNA precursors to the size of mature U2. The substrate for this RNA processing reaction is the ribonucleoprotein complex containing pre-U2 RNA. To circumvent the difficulty of biochemically isolating pre-U2 ribonucleoprotein (pre-U2 RNP) complexes for use as substrate for the analysis of the processing activity, we have developed a procedure for the processing of pre-U2 RNP complexes that have been immobilized on anti-Sm antibody/protein A-Sepharose columns. When the immobilized [3H]uridine-labeled substrate RNP complexes are incubated at 37 degrees C with unlabeled cytoplasmic extracts from HeLa cells, labeled molecules the size of mature U2 are produced in a linear fashion for up to 3 h. Similar results are obtained when substrate pre-U2 RNPs are immobilized with an anti-2,2,7-trimethylguanosine antibody. Thus, accurate processing of the 3' termini of U2 precursors occurs on the antibody columns. Incubation with buffer alone does not result in the production of mature-sized U2, indicating that the processing activity is not intrinsic to the pre-U2 RNP. Using this assay procedure, we have demonstrated that the processing activity is destroyed by trypsin or by preincubation at 65 degrees C but is resistant to treatment with micrococcal nuclease. These results are compatible with the conclusion that the processing activity is a classical enzyme that does not contain a nuclease-sensitive essential RNA component.     

Binding of human SLBP on the 3'-UTR of histone precursor H4-12 mRNA induces structural rearrangements that enable U7 snRNA anchoring

In metazoans, cell-cycle-dependent histones are produced from poly(A)-lacking mRNAs. The 3′ end of histone mRNAs is formed by an endonucleolytic cleavage of longer precursors between a conserved stem–loop structure and a purine-rich histone downstream element (HDE). The cleavage requires at least two trans-acting factors: the stem–loop binding protein (SLBP), which binds to the stem–loop and the U7 snRNP, which anchors to histone pre-mRNAs by annealing to the HDE. Using RNA structure-probing techniques, we determined the secondary structure of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of mouse histone pre-mRNAs H4–12, H1t and H2a–614. Surprisingly, the HDE is embedded in hairpin structures and is therefore not easily accessible for U7 snRNP anchoring. Probing of the 3′-UTR in complex with SLBP revealed structural rearrangements leading to an overall opening of the structure especially at the level of the HDE. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the SLBP-induced opening of HDE actually facilitates U7 snRNA anchoring on the histone H4–12 pre-mRNAs 3′ end. These results suggest that initial binding of the SLBP functions in making the HDE more accessible for U7 snRNA anchoring.     

A complex pathway for 3' processing of the yeast U3 snoRNA

Mature U3 snoRNA in yeast is generated from the 3′-extended precursors by endonucleolytic cleavage followed by exonucleolytic trimming. These precursors terminate in poly(U) tracts and are normally stabilised by binding of the yeast La homologue, Lhp1p. We report that normal 3′ processing of U3 requires the nuclear Lsm proteins. On depletion of any of the five essential proteins, Lsm2–5p or Lsm8p, the normal 3′-extended precursors to the U3 snoRNA were lost. Truncated fragments of both mature and pre-U3 accumulated in the Lsm-depleted strains, consistent with substantial RNA degradation. Pre-U3 species were co-precipitated with TAP-tagged Lsm3p, but the association with spliced pre-U3 was lost in strains lacking Lhp1p. The association of Lhp1p with pre-U3 was also reduced on depletion of Lsm3p or Lsm5p, indicating that binding of Lhp1p and the Lsm proteins is interdependent. In contrast, a tagged Sm-protein detectably co-precipitated spliced pre-U3 species only in strains lacking Lhp1p. We propose that the Lsm2–8p complex functions as a chaperone in conjunction with Lhp1p to stabilise pre-U3 RNA species during 3′ processing. The Sm complex may function as a back-up to stabilise 3′ ends that are not protected by Lhp1p.     

Sequences required for 3' end formation of human U2 small nuclear RNA

Xenopus oocytes injected with human U2 snRNA genes synthesize mature U2 as well as a U2 precursor with about 10 extra 3' nucleotides (human pre-U2 RNA). Formation of the pre-U2 3' end requires a downstream element located between position +16 and +37 in the U2 3'-flanking sequence. The distance between this element and the U2 coding region can be increased without affecting formation of the pre-U2 3' end. When the natural sequence surrounding the pre-U2 3' end is changed, novel 3' ends are still generated within a narrow range upstream from the element. The 3' terminal stem-loop of U2 snRNA is not required for pre-U2 3' end formation. A sequence within the 3' element (GTTTN0-3AAAPuNNAGA) is conserved among snRNA genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II. Our results suggest that the 3' ends of pre-U2 RNA and histone mRNA may be generated by related but distinct RNA processing mechanisms.     

The Respiratory Syncytial Virus Polymerase Has Multiple RNA Synthesis Activities at the Promoter

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an RNA virus in the Family Paramyxoviridae. Here, the activities performed by the RSV polymerase when it encounters the viral antigenomic promoter were examined. RSV RNA synthesis was reconstituted in vitro using recombinant, isolated polymerase and an RNA oligonucleotide template representing nucleotides 1–25 of the trailer complement (TrC) promoter. The RSV polymerase was found to have two RNA synthesis activities, initiating RNA synthesis from the +3 site on the promoter, and adding a specific sequence of nucleotides to the 3′ end of the TrC RNA using a back-priming mechanism. Examination of viral RNA isolated from RSV infected cells identified RNAs initiated at the +3 site on the TrC promoter, in addition to the expected +1 site, and showed that a significant proportion of antigenome RNAs contained specific nucleotide additions at the 3′ end, demonstrating that the observations made in vitro reflected events that occur during RSV infection. Analysis of the impact of the 3′ terminal extension on promoter activity indicated that it can inhibit RNA synthesis initiation. These findings indicate that RSV polymerase-promoter interactions are more complex than previously thought and suggest that there might be sophisticated mechanisms for regulating promoter activity during infection.     

Drosophila RNase Z processes mitochondrial and nuclear pre-tRNA 3' ends in vivo

Although correct tRNA 3′ ends are crucial for protein biosynthesis, generation of mature tRNA 3′ ends in eukaryotes is poorly understood and has so far only been investigated in vitro. We report here for the first time that eukaryotic tRNA 3′ end maturation is catalysed by the endonuclease RNase Z in vivo. Silencing of the JhI-1 gene (RNase Z homolog) in vivo with RNAi in Drosophila S2 cultured cells causes accumulation of nuclear and mitochondrial pre-tRNAs, suggesting that JhI-1 encodes both forms of the tRNA 3′ endonuclease RNase Z, and establishing its biological role in endonucleolytic tRNA 3′ end processing. In addition our data show that in vivo 5′ processing of nuclear and mitochondrial pre-tRNAs occurs before 3′ processing.     

Y box-binding protein-1 binds preferentially to single-stranded nucleic acids and exhibits 3'-->5' exonuclease activity

We have previously shown that Y box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) binds preferentially to cisplatin-modified Y box sequences. Based on structural and biochemical data, we predicted that this protein binds single-stranded nucleic acids. In the present study we confirmed the prediction and also discovered some unexpected functional features of YB-1. We found that the cold shock domain of the protein is necessary but not sufficient for double-stranded DNA binding while the C-tail domain interacts with both single-stranded DNA and RNA independently of the cold shock domain. In an in vitro translation system the C-tail domain of the protein inhibited translation but the cold shock domain did not. Both in vitro pull-down and in vivo co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed that YB-1 can form a homodimer. Deletion analysis mapped the C-tail domain of the protein as the region of homodimerization. We also characterized an intrinsic 3′→5′ DNA exonuclease activity of the protein. The region between residues 51 and 205 of its 324-amino acid extent is required for full exonuclease activity. Our findings suggest that YB-1 functions in regulating DNA/RNA transactions and that these actions involve different domains.