Rapid degradation of longer DNA fragments enables the improved estimation of distribution and biomass using environmental DNA |
| |
| Authors: | Toshiaki Jo Hiroaki Murakami Reiji Masuda Masayuki K Sakata Satoshi Yamamoto Toshifumi Minamoto |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan;2. Maizuru Fisheries Research Station, Kyoto University, Maizuru, Kyoto, Japan |
| |
| Abstract: | The advent of environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis methods has enabled rapid and wide‐range ecological monitoring in aquatic ecosystems, but there is a dearth of information on eDNA degradation. The results of previous studies suggest that the decay rate of eDNA varies depending on the length of DNA fragments. To examine this hypothesis, we compared temporal change in copy number of long eDNA fragments (719 bp) with that of short eDNA fragments (127 bp). First, we isolated rearing water from a target fish species, Japanese Jack Mackerel (Trachurus japonicus), and then quantified the copy number of the long and short eDNA fragments in 1 L water samples after isolating the water from the fish. Long DNA fragments showed a higher decay rate than short fragments. Next, we measured the eDNA copy numbers of long and short DNA fragments using field samples, and compared them with fish biomass as measured by echo intensity. Although a previous study suggested that short eDNA fragments could be overestimated because of nontarget eDNA from a nearby fish market and carcasses, the eDNA concentrations of long fragments were correlated with echo intensity. This suggests that the concentration of longer eDNA fragments reflects fish biomass more accurately than the previous study by removing the effects of the fish market and carcasses. The length‐related differences in eDNA have a substantial potential to improve estimation of species biomass. |
| |
| Keywords: | decay rate DNA fragment length echo intensity environmental DNA (eDNA) Japanese Jack Mackerel (Trachurus japonicus) quantitative real‐time PCR |
|
|
