The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
| |
| Authors: | Joshua R Ennen Jeffrey E Lovich Roy C Averill‐Murray Charles B Yackulic Mickey Agha Caleb Loughran Laura Tennant Barry Sinervo |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute, Chattanooga, TN, USA;2. U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ, USA;3. Nongame Branch, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ, USA;4. Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA;5. Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA;6. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within‐generation hypothesis arising out of bet‐hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet‐hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet‐hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet‐hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra‐ and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late‐season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade‐offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long‐term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD. |
| |
| Keywords: | benign environment hypothesis bet‐hedging environmental predictability offspring fitness optimal egg size phenotypic diversification reproductive trade‐off sexually antagonistic selection tortoise |
|
|
