首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

Aims
作者姓名:徐婷  曹林  申鑫  佘光辉
作者单位:南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心, 南京 210037
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目;江苏省高校自然科学研究面上项目
摘    要: 快速、定量、精确地估算区域森林生物量一直是森林生态功能评价以及碳储量研究的重要问题。该研究基于机载激光雷达(LiDAR)点云与Landsat 8 OLI多光谱数据, 借助江苏省常熟市虞山地区55块调查样地数据, 首先提取并分析了87个特征变量(53个OLI特征变量, 34个LiDAR特征变量)与森林地上、地下生物量的Pearson’s相关系数以进行变量优选, 然后利用多元逐步回归法建立森林生物量估算模型(OLI生物量估算模型和LiDAR生物量估算模型), 并与基于两种数据建立的综合生物量估算模型的结果进行比较, 讨论预测结果及其精确性。结果表明: 3种模型(OLI模型、LiDAR模型和综合模型)在所有样地无区分分析时, 地上和地下生物量的估算精度均达到0.4以上, 基于不同森林类型(针叶林、阔叶林、混交林)分析时地上和地下生物量的估算精度均有明显提高, 达到0.67及以上。利用分森林类型模型估算生物量, 综合生物量估算模型精度(地上生物量: R2为0.88; 地下生物量: R2为0.92)优于OLI生物量估算模型(地上生物量: R2为0.73; 地下生物量: R2为0.81)和LiDAR生物量估算模型(地上生物量: R2为0.86; 地下生物量: R2为0.83)。

关 键 词:森林生物量估算    亚热带森林    OLI多光谱数据    机载小光斑激光雷达数据    逐步回归
收稿时间:2014-10-11

Estimates of subtropical forest biomass based on airborne LiDAR and Landsat 8 OLI data
XU Ting,CAO Lin,SHEN Xin,SHE Guang-Hui.Aims[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2015,39(4):309-321.
Authors:XU Ting  CAO Lin  SHEN Xin  SHE Guang-Hui
Affiliation:Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Abstract:Aims Estimating forest biomass at regional scale with high accuracy is among the pressing challenges in evaluating ecosystem functions and characteristics (e.g., carbon storage). Methods This study is based on airborne small-footprint discrete-return LiDAR data, Landsat 8 OLI multispectral data, and in situ measurements from 55 forest plots in Yushan, Changshu, Jiangsu Province. A total of 87 independent variables (53 from OLI metrics and 34 from LiDAR metrics) were used in the Pearson correlation analysis for estimating aboveground (WA) and belowground (WB) biomass by identifying the significant independent variables. Three independent models by using OLI, LiDAR and their combinations (i.e., the combo model) were established through stepwise regression analysis. Important findings The correlation coefficients of determination (R2) for WA and WB models are greater than 0.4. The R2 seemed much higher when the estimations were type-specific (e.g., coniferous, broad-leaf and mixed forest), with R2 of >0.67. The Combo model by forest type yielded an R2 of 0.88 for WA and 0.92 for WB, while the OLI-based model had R2 of 0.73 and 0.81 for WA and WB, respectively. The LiDAR-based model has R2 of 0.86 and 0.83 for WA and WB, respectively.
Keywords:estimate of forest biomass  subtropical forest  OLI multispectral data  air borne small-footprint Li-DAR data  stepwise regression
点击此处可从《植物生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号