Population structure of caribou in an ice‐bound archipelago |
| |
| Authors: | Deborah A Jenkins Glenn Yannic James Conolly Nicolas Lecomte |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada;2. Canada Research Chair in Polar and Boreal Ecology and Centre d'études Nordiques, University of Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada;3. University of Grenoble Alpes, University of Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine), Le Bourget‐du‐Lac, France;4. Department of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Aim Archipelagos provide ideal natural systems for testing the effects of isolation and fragmentation of habitats on the genetic makeup of populations—an important consideration, given that many insular species are of conservation concern. Two theories predominate: Island Biogeography Theory (IBT) posits that proximity to the mainland drives the potential for migrants and gene flow. The Central Marginal Hypothesis (CMH) predicts that island populations at the periphery of a species range may experience low gene flow, small population size and high rates of genetic drift. We investigated population genetic structure, genetic diversity and key drivers of diversity for Arctic island‐dwelling caribou (Rangifer tarandus). Our aim was to inform intraspecific units for conservation and decipher how IBT and CMH could act in an archipelago where isolation is highly variable due to sea ice and open water. Location Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Canada (Latitude, 55–82°N; Longitude, 61–123°W). Methods We genotyped 447 caribou at 16 microsatellite loci; these caribou represented two subspecies (R. t. groenlandicus, R. t. pearyi) and three designatable units. We used hierarchical Bayesian clustering and ordination to determine genetic groups. We evaluated the influence of ecological and geographic variables on genetic diversity using linear mixed‐effects models and compared diversity among mainland and island herds. Results Bayesian clustering revealed nine genetic clusters with differentiation among and within caribou subspecies. Genetic differentiation was explained predominantly by isolation‐by‐distance across all caribou, even at the scale of subspecies. Island caribou were less genetically diverse than mainland herds; individual heterozygosity was negatively correlated with distance‐to‐mainland and the extent of autumn ice‐free coastline and positively correlated with unglaciated island size. Main conclusions Our findings underscore the importance of hierarchical analysis when investigating genetic population structure. Genetic diversity and its key drivers lend support to both IBT and CMH and highlight the pending threat of climate change for Arctic island caribou. |
| |
| Keywords: | Arctic Bayesian clustering connectivity designatable units genetic diversity landscape heterogeneity population structure
Rangifer tarandus
|
|
|
