Effects of Ca and Mg concentrations in seawater on the growth and energy budget of juvenile Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) |
| |
| Authors: | M L Wang X M Zhang T X Gao P D Zhang |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, China;2. Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Effects of seawater calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) concentrations on the growth and energy budget of juvenile Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) were investigated at 20°C and a salinity of 30 psu. The Ca/Mg ratio (Ca : Mg = 1 : 3) in the experimental water was kept constant. Five treatments were set: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5, and the Ca and Mg concentrations were 700, 1100, 1600, 2200, and 2800 (mg L?1), respectively. After a 60‐day feeding trial the P. olivaceus survival rates were not affected significantly by Ca or Mg concentrations in the range of 700–2800 mg L?1. However, the specific growth rates (SGR) and weight gain (WG) of all treatments decreased with ascending Ca and Mg concentrations. The Ca and Mg concentrations had a strong influence on various energy parameters, namely, energy deposited for growth (G), energy lost for respiration (R), and energy lost in excretion (U), but had little influence on energy lost in feces (F). This indicated that the growth rate differences under different concentrations of Ca and Mg mainly resulted from differences of assimilation efficiency and energy channeled into respiration. The highest net growth efficiency was attained at the lowest concentration of Ca and Mg in seawater, and the higher concentrations of Ca and Mg increased the energy channeled to respiration and excretion, which led to significant reduction in growth. Therefore, the optimal growth of P. olivaceus could be obtained by regulating the concentration of Ca and Mg at 700 mg L?1, where the average energy budget was: 100C (100% energy consumed in food) = 47.21 (±0.63) G + 32.89 (±0.42) R + 16.71 (±0.56) F + 3.19 (±0.05) U. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
