欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

巨桉人工林中小型土壤动物类群分布规律

黄玉梅1;张健2;杨万勤2   

  1. 1四川农业大学都江堰分校, 四川都江堰 611830;
    2四川农业大学林学园艺学院, 四川雅安 625014
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-21 修回日期:2006-09-17 出版日期:2006-12-18 发布日期:2006-12-18

Distribution pattern of mesomicro soil fauna in Eucalyptus grandis plantation.

HUANG Yumei1; ZHANG Jian2;YANG Wanqin2   

  1. 1Dujiangyan Campus, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan 611830, Sichuan, China;
    2College of Forestry and Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-11-21 Revised:2006-09-17 Online:2006-12-18 Published:2006-12-18

摘要: 研究了四川省洪雅县巨桉人工林中小型土壤动物类群及数量分布规律.结果表明,巨桉人工林四季共获中小型土壤动物13 550头,分属6门13纲26目,以蜱螨目、线虫纲、弹尾目为优势类群,以线蚓科为常见类群.各样地中小型土壤动物类群数、个体数均有明显季节变化,以秋季或冬季最高,春季最低,夏季次之.中小型土壤动物密度剖面分布表聚性明显,但在5~10 cm和10~15 cm土层间有时会出现逆向分布现象.中小型湿生土壤动物密度为3.333×103~2.533×105个·m-2,中小型干生土壤动物密度为1.670×102~2.393×105个·m-2,中小型湿生土壤动物密度自上而下减少的速率小于中小型干生土壤动物.巨桉人工林中小型土壤动物密度-类群(DG)指数以春季最低,秋季或夏季最高(可达6.637).巨桉人工林与青冈次生林中小型土壤动物密度及DG指数均无显著差异.

关键词: 羊草, 无性系, 营养繁殖世代, 分株, 芽库, 构件, 年龄结构

Abstract: In this paper, meso-micro soil fauna were extracted and collected by Baermann’s and Tullgren’s method, and their distribution pattern in theEucalyptus grandis plantation of Hongya County, Sichuan Province was studied. A total of 13550 specimens were collected, belonging to 6 phyla, 13 classes, and 26 orders. Acarina, Nematoda, Collembola were the dominant groups, and Enchytraeidae was the frequent one. The group and individual numbers of meso-micro soil fauna varied with seasons, being the maximum in autumn or winter, fewer in summer, and the minimum in spring. The density of meso-micro soil fauna in soil profile decreased rapidly with increasing soil depth, but a converse distribution was observed from time to time in 5~10 cm and 10~15 cm soil layers. The meso-micro soil fauna collected by Baermann’s and Tullgren’s method had a density of 3.333×103~2.533×105 ind·m-2 and 1.670×102~2.393×105 ind·m-2, respectively, and the decreasing rate of the density with the increase of soil depth was higher for those collected by Tullgren’s method. The density-group index of meso-micro soil fauna in the E. grandis plantation was the lowest in spring, but the highest in autumn or summer. There were no significant differences in the density of meso-micro soil fauna and in the density-group index between E. grandis plantation and Quercus acutissima secondary forest.

Key words: Leymus chinensis, Clone, Generation of vegetative propagation, Ramet, Bud bank, Module, Age structure